DGS49
Diamond Member
Prosecutors have a strong criminal case against Trump - NY Daily News
Isn't there a rule or a code of ethics or something that restrains "professional Journalists" from spouting demonstrable nonsense, in the guise of knowledgeable opinion?
You don't have to be a lawyer to know that the payments to the two slut-slanderers, EVEN IF MADE IN CASH IN Times Square DIRECTLY FROM TRUMP TO THE SLUTS, would be entirely legal. And anyone with even a minimal interest in federal election law would know about the John Edwards payments-to-paramour case which pretty much dissolved the notion that payments like this ARE NOT campaign expenditures.
So I end up in the same place on all of these scores and scores of Trump exposes, fire drills, and "scoops":
Are these people stupid? Are they liars? Or are they just so committed to their own partisanship that they have rejected reality for their own made-up world? It has to be one of the three.
Isn't there a rule or a code of ethics or something that restrains "professional Journalists" from spouting demonstrable nonsense, in the guise of knowledgeable opinion?
You don't have to be a lawyer to know that the payments to the two slut-slanderers, EVEN IF MADE IN CASH IN Times Square DIRECTLY FROM TRUMP TO THE SLUTS, would be entirely legal. And anyone with even a minimal interest in federal election law would know about the John Edwards payments-to-paramour case which pretty much dissolved the notion that payments like this ARE NOT campaign expenditures.
So I end up in the same place on all of these scores and scores of Trump exposes, fire drills, and "scoops":
Are these people stupid? Are they liars? Or are they just so committed to their own partisanship that they have rejected reality for their own made-up world? It has to be one of the three.