Neotrotsky
Council to Supreme Soviet
- Thread starter
- #41
It was opinion- was it not?
Well, apparently you feel you do
Please tell- why would it be wrong?
Why would what be wrong?
So then you assume my statement to be true..
Good to see!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was opinion- was it not?
Well, apparently you feel you do
Please tell- why would it be wrong?
Why would what be wrong?
So then you assume my statement to be true..
Good to see!
I am still curious about what specifically the right finds objectionable about this bill.
Healthier meals for kids on reduced and free lunch programs seems like a no-brainer.
Of course, I am in a hospital that services a patient population that is almost 100% medicaid and I see the end result of a lifetime of poor nutrition which is diabetes and heart disease which have to be managed for decades and cost the taxpayers a shit ton of money.
This seems like money well spent to me.
School lunchrooms make profits or at least break even in most school districts. They have a captive audience and sell the foods that kids like, hot dogs, soda pops, and french fries, which is very profitable junk food. Schools are required to offer a meal with at least some food value, however most school districts also supply the junk food that kids crave. Our local schools have got rid of the soda machines. Hopefully we are doing something about the meals.
If we want to reduce the cost of healthcare in 21st century, we need to be looking at lot closer at the lifestyles of our kids. Junk food is still offered in most of our school cafeterias and PE is voluntary in a number of states.
So then you assume my statement to be true..
Good to see!
No, I find the content of your posts to be painfully poorly constructed and asked you to clarify a question.
I am still curious about what specifically the right finds objectionable about this bill.
Healthier meals for kids on reduced and free lunch programs seems like a no-brainer.
Of course, I am in a hospital that services a patient population that is almost 100% medicaid and I see the end result of a lifetime of poor nutrition which is diabetes and heart disease which have to be managed for decades and cost the taxpayers a shit ton of money.
This seems like money well spent to me.
I believe people should be free to make their own decisions and destroy their own health, if that is their choosing. You and the Democrats seek to coddle the ignorant. First, you want to make laws that protect them from their own stupidity. Then, even if those laws don't work, you want healthcare to cover their ignorance. I say let them kill themselves off and allow evolution to work its magic.
So then you assume my statement to be true..
Good to see!
No, I find the content of your posts to be painfully poorly constructed and asked you to clarify a question.
The pain you feel is truth.
In fact, truth is hard for the Left; it is their worst enemy
Well, that has not been my experience, but maybe the food offered in our district is different. I worked closely with the food service director in a large school district. There was always pressure to break even or show a profit on food sales. The most profitable items were always the soda machines and the junk food. If federal guidelines did not force the district to provide a balanced meal, I seriously doubt that the district would serve one.School lunchrooms make profits or at least break even in most school districts. They have a captive audience and sell the foods that kids like, hot dogs, soda pops, and french fries, which is very profitable junk food. Schools are required to offer a meal with at least some food value, however most school districts also supply the junk food that kids crave. Our local schools have got rid of the soda machines. Hopefully we are doing something about the meals.
If we want to reduce the cost of healthcare in 21st century, we need to be looking at lot closer at the lifestyles of our kids. Junk food is still offered in most of our school cafeterias and PE is voluntary in a number of states.
I'll say that I'm surprised by what high school students overwhelmingly choose to PAY FOR at school. Granted I've been subbing just 3 months in three high schools in suburbs nearly 5 days a week. In the morning most go for oatmeal or fruit-they are not what the school provides, but makes available in the cafe. At lunch the most popular lunch is brought from home. Second is salad bar.
My oldest is 29 and youngest 25, even when they were in high school the vending machines were there and so was the salad/soup bar. Mostly they packed their own lunches, they felt it was a bigger bang, meaning I paid for the food. If they bought lunch it came out of their money.
Same thing with 'junk food.' They were sensible enough to realize that they could buy a bag at grocery, while the machines were very pricey. Believe me, spend some time in high school cafes by the machines, if they get hit 15 times in an hour it's a lot. Really.
Well, that has not been my experience, but maybe the food offered in our district is different. I worked closely with the food service director in a large school district. There was always pressure to break even or show a profit on food sales. The most profitable items were always the soda machines and the junk food. If federal guidelines did not force the district to provide a balanced meal, I seriously doubt that the district would serve one.School lunchrooms make profits or at least break even in most school districts. They have a captive audience and sell the foods that kids like, hot dogs, soda pops, and french fries, which is very profitable junk food. Schools are required to offer a meal with at least some food value, however most school districts also supply the junk food that kids crave. Our local schools have got rid of the soda machines. Hopefully we are doing something about the meals.
If we want to reduce the cost of healthcare in 21st century, we need to be looking at lot closer at the lifestyles of our kids. Junk food is still offered in most of our school cafeterias and PE is voluntary in a number of states.
I'll say that I'm surprised by what high school students overwhelmingly choose to PAY FOR at school. Granted I've been subbing just 3 months in three high schools in suburbs nearly 5 days a week. In the morning most go for oatmeal or fruit-they are not what the school provides, but makes available in the cafe. At lunch the most popular lunch is brought from home. Second is salad bar.
My oldest is 29 and youngest 25, even when they were in high school the vending machines were there and so was the salad/soup bar. Mostly they packed their own lunches, they felt it was a bigger bang, meaning I paid for the food. If they bought lunch it came out of their money.
Same thing with 'junk food.' They were sensible enough to realize that they could buy a bag at grocery, while the machines were very pricey. Believe me, spend some time in high school cafes by the machines, if they get hit 15 times in an hour it's a lot. Really.
This is just my experience. I'm sure it is different with different districts and states.
Threads like these are proof that the right will attack anything and everything Obama.
Threads like these are proof that the right will attack anything and everything Obama.
Threads like these are proof that the right will attack anything and everything Obama.
Threads like these are proof that the right will attack anything and everything Obama.
I think nutrition should be the prime concern while taking the diet. Michelle Obama is right while discussing regarding the diet. Children are nowadays so very inclined towards junk food that they are lacking the nutritional food value. Video is worth to watch!