Israel, Saudis want Iran war with USA (Trump)

[Bleipriester]

Actually, Israel and Saudi Arabia joining forces to go to war with Iran would be a historical precedence.

Imagine two countries that have been implacable enemies for 3/4 of a century joining forces to take out a common threat.

SA invited Israel to use their airfields.

Only SA?

Dunno. But I guess so. They are out of favor.

 

[Bleipriester]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US,
but on Egypt.

They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai.
Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

you are OUT of your freakin mind
Israel does NOT want any more wars--they've had enough
but if it comes down to self-defense, they will kick some a$$
...most people/politicians /etc do not want war

So, the article is just fake news.
LOL, wow.

the regime will only respond to massive economic pressure and, if necessary, military force.

From your link.

 

[rylah]

Actually, Israel and Saudi Arabia joining forces to go to war with Iran would be a historical precedence.

Imagine two countries that have been implacable enemies for 3/4 of a century joining forces to take out a common threat.

SA invited Israel to use their airfields.

Only SA?

Dunno. But I guess so. They are out of favor.

Out of favor?
Iran doesn't know from where only that it has already been visited.
Look at the Arab states openly siding against Iran, and look at the road they declared to build to reach the Mediterranean.

• Here's a good question to linger on - does Turkey hate Israel enough to tolerate getting surrounded by Iran?
• Another good question - what are the logical conclusions for every surrounding Arab state in case of Iran's: a) defeat of geopolitical goals b) regime change?

 

[rylah]

you are OUT of your freakin mind
Israel does NOT want any more wars--they've had enough
but if it comes down to self-defense, they will kick some a$$
...most people/politicians /etc do not want war

So, the article is just fake news.
LOL, wow.

the regime will only respond to massive economic pressure and, if necessary, military force.

From your link.

Sanctions work, they still have the grip on the people though,
no matter how financially broken. I don't see them giving up on exporting the revolution.
They'll throw something out before accepting change, the question is whether it's going to be strategically for political PR, as to not look as giving up without a fight, but keep the war on mid flames to not provoke total fall of regime, or make a desperate full out bang attempting to reach the Mediterranean in sufficient force to make the corridor a secure investment in the geopolitical shift. They just can't keep the situation of proxies standstill as it is, must move forward to make their presence abroad viable economically.

 

[rylah]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US,
but on Egypt.

They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai.
Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

What indication do You have for that?
I think Egypt just never lost its ambitions of returning to be the US of the middle east.

 

[Bleipriester]

Out of favor?
Iran doesn't know from where only that it has already been visited.
Look at the Arab states openly siding against Iran, and look at the road they declared to build to reach the Mediterranean.

1.) Religious tensions
2.) Imagine the US would prefer Iran´s oil.

• Here's a good question to linger on - does Turkey hate Israel enough to tolerate getting surrounded by Iran?
• Another good question - what are the logical conclusions for every surrounding Arab state in case of Iran's: a) defeat of geopolitical goals b) regime change?

1.) I believe that Erdogan tries to exploit all situations. He even tolerates getting surrounded by ISIS. Also, if everything Iran does is trying to expand influence they cannot do anymore. They have 80 million who have to make a living.

2.)
a) Nothing. It will always be enough to deliver some missiles.
b) There will probably be chaos for a long period. A regime change would probably result from inner resistance.

 

[SAYIT]

Actually, Israel and Saudi Arabia joining forces to go to war with Iran would be a historical precedence. Imagine two countries that have been implacable enemies for 3/4 of a century joining forces to take out a common threat.

SA invited Israel to use their airfields.

Which presumably includes the OK for the Israeli AF to use Saudi airspace.

That tells me that the Saudis do not consider Israel to be the enemy, and vice versa..

 

[SAYIT]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US, but on Egypt. They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai. Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

 

[Lipush]

What a load of crap.

 

[Bleipriester]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US, but on Egypt. They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai. Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

 

[USAF 2023]

As usual, the Axis of evil shows it's teeth.

Our allies are dirtier dogs, than Iran, by a long shot.

From Bolton to Bibi, Trump faces calls for confronting Iran

NATIONAL SECURITY[/paste:font]
Israel, Saudi Arabia and Trump aides want confrontation with Iran. Will Trump listen?
Analysis: With North Korea, Trump first threatened and then sought a deal. But he has a more hardline White House team now, with fewer moderating voices.

President Donald Trump walks out of the Oval Office at the White House on May 14, 2019.Andrew Harnik / AP


May 14, 2019, 4:59 PM EDT
By Dan De Luce

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump campaigned on promises to extract the United States from wars in the Middle East. But his national security adviser, Republicans in Congress and trusted allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia are pushing for a confrontation with Iran.

The rationale for taking an aggressive stance with Tehran may differ, but leaders in Tel Aviv, Riyadh and hawks in Washington share a common view that diplomacy with Iran is mostly futile and that the regime will only respond to massive economic pressure and, if necessary, military force.

Good , I hope you get drafted


.

He’s too stupid; Nobody would want him.

 

[USAF 2023]

As usual, the Axis of evil shows it's teeth.

Our allies are dirtier dogs, than Iran, by a long shot.

From Bolton to Bibi, Trump faces calls for confronting Iran

NATIONAL SECURITY[/paste:font]
Israel, Saudi Arabia and Trump aides want confrontation with Iran. Will Trump listen?
Analysis: With North Korea, Trump first threatened and then sought a deal. But he has a more hardline White House team now, with fewer moderating voices.

President Donald Trump walks out of the Oval Office at the White House on May 14, 2019.Andrew Harnik / AP


May 14, 2019, 4:59 PM EDT
By Dan De Luce

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump campaigned on promises to extract the United States from wars in the Middle East. But his national security adviser, Republicans in Congress and trusted allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia are pushing for a confrontation with Iran.

The rationale for taking an aggressive stance with Tehran may differ, but leaders in Tel Aviv, Riyadh and hawks in Washington share a common view that diplomacy with Iran is mostly futile and that the regime will only respond to massive economic pressure and, if necessary, military force.

Good , I hope you get drafted


.

I don't support another likely Vietnam war situation, or perhaps worse WW3, and perhaps even worse than WW2, with a Nuclear apocalypse.

That's what they said about Iraq...

.

Russia supports Iran, well sometimes.
If they prop up Iran, then it's totally different.

By taking out Iraq, helped Iran, and ISIS spread into Iraq.

As usual, Neocons prove to be dunces.

PS.
Why are you so pro-Israel?
Considering they think not only your German heritage owes them money, but also your Polish heritage owes them money too.

Here we go again; The denial of History; We all know it’s guilt.

 

[rylah]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US, but on Egypt. They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai. Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

The Israeli - Arab alliance is complementary to the sanctions,
for the day the Ayatollahs are forced to decide between internal economy and their regional military goals.
Your country seems to be in the Iranian alliance?

 

[xband]

Saudi Arabia is Sunni and Iran is Shiite and the schism occurred when Mohammad went to the mountain or did the mountain come to Mohammad?

 

[rylah]

Direct confrontation is counter to the tactic played out and the reality on the ground.
A war initiated by the Israeli - Arab alliance would give the Ayatollahs the needed political boost to survive,
and on top of that enable it take control of resources in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Africa they fail to now.

Turks have just blocked Iranian oil, they're selling less than a million barrels a day.
Loss of metal industry and other market already lowered their economy 80%.

 

[Bleipriester]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US, but on Egypt. They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai. Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

The Israeli - Arab alliance is complementary to the sanctions,
for the day the Ayatollahs are forced to decide between internal economy and their regional military goals.
Your country seems to be in the Iranian alliance?

No. My country supports the atom deal.

 

[irosie91]

All eyes are now not on Israel, Iran, SA or the US, but on Egypt. They have yet shown a clear stance to the Arab world itself, and arm as crazy in Sinai. Don't hear about that in the news.

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

The Israeli - Arab alliance is complementary to the sanctions,
for the day the Ayatollahs are forced to decide between internal economy and their regional military goals.
Your country seems to be in the Iranian alliance?

No. My country supports the atom deal.

^^^^^ what is YOUR country and what is the "atom deal"? capt?

 

[Bleipriester]

Egypt has realized that the SA coalition is not in favor of the Arab countries.

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

The Israeli - Arab alliance is complementary to the sanctions,
for the day the Ayatollahs are forced to decide between internal economy and their regional military goals.
Your country seems to be in the Iranian alliance?

No. My country supports the atom deal.

^^^^^ what is YOUR country and what is the "atom deal"? capt?

You don´t know that after so many years of your rants?

 

[irosie91]

Or perhaps it's not a negative but rather a positive … that Iran is seen as a far bigger threat than Israel and some Middle East Arab countries want to be on the right side for a change.

They are in the same alliance.

The Israeli - Arab alliance is complementary to the sanctions,
for the day the Ayatollahs are forced to decide between internal economy and their regional military goals.
Your country seems to be in the Iranian alliance?

No. My country supports the atom deal.

^^^^^ what is YOUR country and what is the "atom deal"? capt?

You don´t now that after so many years of your rants?

"NOW" ?? now what? the "atom deal"? has Theresa dumbed down
the entire population?

I would not call the fact that many arab countries are supportive of
the USA sanctions of Iran as an Israeli/arab alliance----NOPE----
Iranians and arabs have hated each other for more than 1000 years. I learned it from arabs and Iranians. ------1/2 century ago (when I was young and beautiful-----and still naïve)