protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,810
- 18,732
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #81
I don't read it. Couldn't care less what it says.If you read the Old Testament, you would know that Jews also are supposed to wear a turban to cover their head.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't read it. Couldn't care less what it says.If you read the Old Testament, you would know that Jews also are supposed to wear a turban to cover their head.
Everyone knows that is NONSENSE. All you're doing is making yourself look ridiculous. Knock yourself out.Clearly it is the west that was always attacking Muslims.
The Muslims are not the guilty party.
Who said anything about Arabs ? I didn't.No, the necessity was to show that the conflict with the west was successive nomadic horsemen off the Steppes and not Arabs.
Does the bust of Timor look Arab or Mongolian?
FALSE! 8:12 says nothing about "after you have been attacked"Wrong again.
You can't take a single line out of context.
For example, 8:12 is about war, after you have been attacked.
It does not mean you are supposed to attack nonbelievers if they have not attacked you first.
The title of the 9th Surrah is Forgiveness and Redemption, which mean you are supposed to forgive those who turn traitor on you twice, and only slay them where ever you find them, after they do it a third time.
How can a people (Jews) who inhabited an area for thousands of years before another group (Muslims) existed, be an illegal invader in that area ? Of course that is preposterous, as is your bullshit presence in this forum.Wrong!
The Hebrew tribes were illegal invader from the beginning.
Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:
The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922
{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."
It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.
Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}
So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.
NO, it does NOT "sound like" that at all. What it sounds like is that I think SELF-DEFENSE is acceptable against the #1 genocidal maniacs of world history (ie. Islamic lunatics).It sounds like you think
genocide is acceptable, against Muslims, because you don't like them.
Wow, just wow.
Why did Irish Catholics, Irish Protestants, Jews, Italians, Germans, Basque, Cubans, all engage in far more terrorist activities than the Islamic Tatars, who look pretty White looking?
I tend to disagree, I think the Muslim problem is mostly racial, rather than religious.
The Muslim problem is neither racial nor religious. Muslims are of all race, and Islam is a vile, satanic cult, not a religion.
Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:
The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922
{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."
It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.
Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}
So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.
Genocidal maniac, After thousands of years, I'm quite sure Palestinians are indigenous too.
BTW, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are Christians too.
Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:
The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922
{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."
It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.
Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}
So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.
Genocidal maniac, After thousands of years, I'm quite sure Palestinians are indigenous too.
BTW, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are Christians too.
“Pal’istanian” as a nationality was invented in late 1967 by the Egyptian Islamic terrorist Yassir Arafat. I checked my calendar an 1967 was a bit less than thousands of years ago.
(COMMENT)Your reading comprehension needs much work.
Clearly, the Jews were ONLY being given encouragement to develop an economic agency to coordinate Jewish economic activities.
(COMMENT)Absolutely NO participation in government what so ever.
The entire point of the British Mandate for Palestine was the obligation of Britain to defend the Arab administration of Palestine until it could defend itself.
Gt. Britain was to have no sovereignty over Palestine, at all.
(COMMENT)The word "Mandate" means an "obligation".
The British had to pay the Palestinians back for helping to defeat the Ottoman Empire.
Jews were owed no such obligation.
(COMMENT)And you seem to not know that the Balfour Declaration was at all.
It was in 1916, while the war was still ongoing, and England have not even captured any of the Ottoman Empire yet.
And all the Balfour Declaration said was that the government of Gt. Britain would look favorably on a Jewish homeland inside of an independent Arab Palestine.
(COMMENT)In 1923 the population was over 90% Muslim Arab, and the Jews were not at all an indigenous population, native, or the majority. It was and is criminal for them to try to rule.
What keeps you awake at night?
If you lived in Israel, it might be the arsenal of this terror group right across the border.
They haven't amassed those 150,000 surface-to-surface rockets for nothing. And they haven't improved their targeting ability without intending to use them.
Dudes: Why not just Hiroshima the scumbuckets and be done with them ?
Is this worth a WW3 scenario, however?
Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.
What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.
Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.
What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
You don't call a racketeer who's been paid back his dept 'a victim'.
Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.
Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.
Actually Arabs dominate 80% of the land intended for Israel,
they're just thirsty for complete domination over the entire middle east, and especially what the Jews have, as an appetizer.
Imagine what a fuss kill, to go to a beer party and break a tooth on the tiniest peanut.
Is this worth a WW3 scenario, however?
Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.
What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.
You don't call a racketeer who's been paid back his dept 'a victim'.
How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands.