Huma Abedin hit the news last July. To be more precise Rep. Michele Bachmann hit the news for outing Abedin and, by extension, outing Secretary Clinton. The MSM only covered it because Michele was running for president and the two johns, McCain & Boehner, attacked her. This thread will bring you up to date if youre interested:
Now, the Islamophiles are at it again because:
Michele committed the unforgivable sin when she spoke up for the country, while Democrat ladies who actually harm the country are given absolution within hours of the public learning about their latest misdeed. When was the last time you heard the MSM mention the ethical problems of Pelosi and Senator Feinstein, or mention the bad Michelles $300,000 a year job before she was first lady. And heaven forbid that the media ever mention the lasting harm Hillary Clinton did to this country and to women in general.
Heres the Muslim mind-boggler:
Islamophiles are taking Communist reverse-finger-pointing to new levels. That is, accuse conservatives of everything the Muslim Brotherhood is guilty of. The technique for reverse-finger-pointing was originally developed by sneaky five year olds when their playmates objected to what the sneaks were trying to pull.
Michele is in good company
Sarah Palin joins Michele Bachmann on the Lefts permanent hit list. Its only a matter of time before the Lefts hit list is put up in post offices next to the FBIs Ten Most Wanted Fugitives posters.
Sarah has been out of office for years. Sarah never held federal office, nor did she ever have a federal job, yet the Left continues to attack her. They cant point to anything she ever did to harm this country so they say We hate her because of the harm she might have done had she become vice president. They believe their hatred is justified in spite of Joe Biden. Note that Sarahs opinions and positions annoy liberals, but they do not harm the country à la Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin.
Heres the latest attack on Sarah:
I guess nobody ever told Ms. Giffords there are consequences to everything including gun controls. She might consider these consequences.
Everybody with a lick of sense knows that guns cannot be kept out of the hands of criminals and nut jobs. So why does anybody think Muslim fundamentalists committed to armed jihad wont have guns. Even if you could disarm them youd have to keep them off of jet planes, too.
Finally, Democrats and their media stooges are determined to make gun controls about criminals rather than the primary reason for the 2nd Amendment. Okay, lets play the game.
Al Qaeda succeeding in Africa should be taken as a warning against disarming Americans. The federal government cannot protect Americans from criminals. There is not a chance the government can protect Americans from jihadists. Disarm law-abiding Americans and they wont be able to defend themselves when bloody jihad breaks out here.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/religion-and-ethics/235899-michelle-bachmann-and-the-queen.html
Now, the Islamophiles are at it again because:
. . . shes been outspoken in her concern about Muslim Brotherhood influence in Washington and its threat to the nations security.
For that, shes being targeted in an aggressive campaign by the left-leaning People for the American Way and major news outlets in her home state of Minnesota.
But several top experts on Islam in America and the strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood, which aims to establish Islamic law worldwide, say instead of being targeted she should be praised.
Among the campaigns against Bachmann has been a petition by PFAW, a coalition featuring liberals such as Alex Baldwin and Norman Lear.
They are gathering signatures, reportedly 178,000 now, urging Republican House Speaker John Boehner to take away Bachmanns assignment to the House Intelligence Committee.
The petition states: In service to ugly Islamophobic fear mongering, Rep. Michele Bachmann continues unabated in her unfounded and irresponsible attacks on dedicated public servants a witch hunt that has targeted Huma Abedin, a key aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and now includes allegations that President Obama may be aiding the rise of global Shariah law.
Michele committed the unforgivable sin when she spoke up for the country, while Democrat ladies who actually harm the country are given absolution within hours of the public learning about their latest misdeed. When was the last time you heard the MSM mention the ethical problems of Pelosi and Senator Feinstein, or mention the bad Michelles $300,000 a year job before she was first lady. And heaven forbid that the media ever mention the lasting harm Hillary Clinton did to this country and to women in general.
Heres the Muslim mind-boggler:
The signatories assert conspiracy theories and religious McCarthyism should have no place in our government, especially in the House Intelligence Committee, on which Rep. Bachmann sits.
Bull's-eye on Bachmann over Islamist threat
Campaign tells Congress to eject representative from intel committee
Published: 11 hours ago
by DAVE TOMBERS
Bull?s-eye on Bachmann over Islamist threat
Islamophiles are taking Communist reverse-finger-pointing to new levels. That is, accuse conservatives of everything the Muslim Brotherhood is guilty of. The technique for reverse-finger-pointing was originally developed by sneaky five year olds when their playmates objected to what the sneaks were trying to pull.
Michele is in good company
Sarah Palin joins Michele Bachmann on the Lefts permanent hit list. Its only a matter of time before the Lefts hit list is put up in post offices next to the FBIs Ten Most Wanted Fugitives posters.
Sarah has been out of office for years. Sarah never held federal office, nor did she ever have a federal job, yet the Left continues to attack her. They cant point to anything she ever did to harm this country so they say We hate her because of the harm she might have done had she become vice president. They believe their hatred is justified in spite of Joe Biden. Note that Sarahs opinions and positions annoy liberals, but they do not harm the country à la Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin.
Heres the latest attack on Sarah:
New York Times reporter Peter Baker explored the metaphorical challenges of the gun debate: "In Debate Over Curbing Gun Violence, Even Language Can Be Loaded." It was a politically balanced, if perhaps oversensitive, analysis, until an unfair reference tying Sarah Palin, the former GOP vice presidential candidate, to the shooting by schizophrenic Jared Loughner of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. It's a false tie the Times has exploited before.
XXXXX
"We're on Sarah Palin's targeted list," Ms. Giffords said last March. "But the thing is the way that she has it depicted has the cross hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize there's consequences to that."
New York Times Again Unfairly Slams Sarah Palin for Giffords's Shooting
By Clay Waters | January 17, 2013 | 08:13
New York Times Again Unfairly Slams Sarah Palin for Giffords's Shooting | NewsBusters
I guess nobody ever told Ms. Giffords there are consequences to everything including gun controls. She might consider these consequences.
Everybody with a lick of sense knows that guns cannot be kept out of the hands of criminals and nut jobs. So why does anybody think Muslim fundamentalists committed to armed jihad wont have guns. Even if you could disarm them youd have to keep them off of jet planes, too.
Finally, Democrats and their media stooges are determined to make gun controls about criminals rather than the primary reason for the 2nd Amendment. Okay, lets play the game.
Al Qaeda succeeding in Africa should be taken as a warning against disarming Americans. The federal government cannot protect Americans from criminals. There is not a chance the government can protect Americans from jihadists. Disarm law-abiding Americans and they wont be able to defend themselves when bloody jihad breaks out here.