Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama did very well on both ends.
Corporations can contribute to candidates with no restrictions but there are limits on what unions can give?
Corporations can contribute to candidates with no restrictions but there are limits on what unions can give?
And Obama running for President received millions from overseas donors,foreign donors who
knew just the right amount of money to send so as to keep their identity secret....
No one on the left complained about that...
B]That doesn't address the topic[/B][/QUOTE]
Actually, it does. Ya see, many of you liberals didn't have a problem with Obama reneging on his campaign financing, as he pulled in millions from wallstreet, the soon to be bailed out banks, and unions.
Now that many of these institutions are bailing on the democrats, you've suddenly got a problem with it.
It's called hypocrisy, and you liberals seem to have plenty of it.
Corporations can contribute to candidates with no restrictions but there are limits on what unions can give?
A huge part of the problem is that the Republicans have gotten what they'd been damanding for years, a "balanced unbiased Supreme Court" which sounds good except that when Republicans say "balanced and unbiased" what they really mean is far right and totally biased toward the far right
Coporations tend to donte more to Republicans then Democrats, so of course the lackies on the court want them to be able to give as much as they want
Corporations can contribute to candidates with no restrictions but there are limits on what unions can give?
As I understand it, any organization is limited in the same ways in their donations to any candidate.
However, there is no limit whatsoever on the amount of money that can be spent by anyone or any organization on issue adds that do not mention a candidate by name.
Do you have a link to the source that made you post this topic?
they all get monies from all types of donors, how dumb it is to point fingers, when they are all guilty.
A huge part of the problem is that the Republicans have gotten what they'd been damanding for years, a "balanced unbiased Supreme Court" which sounds good except that when Republicans say "balanced and unbiased" what they really mean is far right and totally biased toward the far right
Coporations tend to donte more to Republicans then Democrats, so of course the lackies on the court want them to be able to give as much as they want
A huge part of the problem is that the Republicans have gotten what they'd been damanding for years, a "balanced unbiased Supreme Court" which sounds good except that when Republicans say "balanced and unbiased" what they really mean is far right and totally biased toward the far right
Coporations tend to donte more to Republicans then Democrats, so of course the lackies on the court want them to be able to give as much as they want