BDBoop
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
I think it has reached the point where it is unconstitutional
It was originally a parlimentary procedure used to extend debate. It has become a defacto change to the Constitution by requiring a 60 percent plurality instead of a 51 percent plurality. It also userps the Vice Presidents tiebreaking vote to where breaking a 50-50 tie is no longer relevant when you need 60 votes just to reach the floor
Exactly. So if is being used as an impediment, then it needs to go. And it IS being used as such. By both sides. Therefore.