Yes or no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ok but one is according to open secrets.Federal candidates cannot accept donations from corporations and businesses.
What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen.
We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Yes, under current law, of course. Our billionaires and corporations can spread as much money around as they want to get their way politically.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen. We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Talk about trying to influence an election Russia has nothing on Google Microsoft AmazonYes, under current law, of course. Our billionaires and corporations can spread as much money around as they want to get their way politically.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen. We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Do I like it? No, of course not.
But that's the way it is, unless and until we stop allowing money to control our politics.
.
Actually, I believe no one should be allowed to contribute to any campaign that works for any entity that controls the flow of information.Corporations are people too.
Yes or no.
That makes no sense to draw that line.Actually, I believe no one should be allowed to contribute to any campaign that works for any entity that controls the flow of information.Corporations are people too.
I didn't realize Microsoft had control of all the information on the internet.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen.
We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
It makes a lot of sense I have the power to control what you put on the internet If it agrees with my political view I will allow it.That makes no sense to draw that line.Actually, I believe no one should be allowed to contribute to any campaign that works for any entity that controls the flow of information.Corporations are people too.
I don't know what term limits would solve, but I agree 100% that the best way to get representatives that don't work only for themselves is to take the money out of politics. It would be so simple. Candidates get a certain amount of money to spend from a nonpartisan pool--all get the same--and a certain amount of free media airtime. No more.Yes, under current law, of course. Our billionaires and corporations can spread as much money around as they want to get their way politically.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen. We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Do I like it? No, of course not.
But that's the way it is, unless and until we stop allowing money to control our politics.
.
Bing is maintained by Microsoft.I didn't realize Microsoft had control of all the information on the internet.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen.
We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
No.Yes or no.
Term limits would at least partially solve the "bringing home the bacon" problem -- Incumbents gaining and maintaining and expanding electoral advantage over any challengers by squeezing money out of the government to please their constituents and campaign funding sources. And then those same politicians crow about fiscal responsibility. That, to me, is madness and insulting.I don't know what term limits would solve, but I agree 100% that the best way to get representatives that don't work only for themselves is to take the money out of politics. It would be so simple. Candidates get a certain amount of money to spend from a nonpartisan pool--all get the same--and a certain amount of free media airtime. No more.Yes, under current law, of course. Our billionaires and corporations can spread as much money around as they want to get their way politically.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen. We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Do I like it? No, of course not.
But that's the way it is, unless and until we stop allowing money to control our politics.
.
I think it's obscene that organizations can go to Washington and buy people's votes, but it happens every day. It's one thing to have people there trying to persuade them and another to be writing them huge checks.
Yup......and congressional members should only be in Washington for a maximum of 6 months.....the rest of the time they need to get real jobs that have nothing to do with government.As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen.
We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
I don't know what term limits would solve, but I agree 100% that the best way to get representatives that don't work only for themselves is to take the money out of politics. It would be so simple. Candidates get a certain amount of money to spend from a nonpartisan pool--all get the same--and a certain amount of free media airtime. No more.Yes, under current law, of course. Our billionaires and corporations can spread as much money around as they want to get their way politically.What about Microsoft? or any internet entity that has control of the information on the internet?As long as we're going to allow money to pollute & distort politics, and as long as we refuse to require term limits, this is going to happen. We can bitch and moan about it all we want, but we're ignoring the bigger picture. We're certainly good at that.
Do I like it? No, of course not.
But that's the way it is, unless and until we stop allowing money to control our politics.
.
I think it's obscene that organizations can go to Washington and buy people's votes, but it happens every day. It's one thing to have people there trying to persuade them and another to be writing them huge checks.