&
☭proletarian☭
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
(1) AGW is certainly falsifiable.
If CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) are responsible for warming, therefore reducing GHGs should lead to a reduction in global temperatures. If reducing GHGs does not lead to reduction in global temps, then AGW has been falsified.
First you must demonstrate causality before forwarding a 'solution'.
Like most AGW believers, you've an overly simplistic view of an extremely complex non-linear system.
(2) AGW is supported by valid science. If there are bad reports in the mix as well, that does not invalidate the valid reports. In fact it would be odd in any field to not have bad reports in the mix. The bulk of evidence is weighed by individuals, consensus, etc etc. YMMV, but it is wrong to say that AGW is not supported by valid evidence.
Noone has yet to demonstrate that increases in manmade greenhouse gasses are responsible for any particular trend of change in global weather cycles.