In Seattle: Romney Forgotten Afghanistan Remembered Not 12 More Years of McCain(?)!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mascale, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    The Republicans famously left out mention of Afghanistan at the Florida Convention. Clint Eastwood apparently started advising The Obama Campaign, a few minutes before the recent Frenzy-On-Wednesday-Even-In-Denver!

    Seattle saw this in the link, apparently, instead!

    Afghan war enters 12th year - seattlepi.com

    The Afghan War mirrors the occasional leadership of the Romney-Ryan brand. Mostly there are factions, in the Republican Party, off in different directions. The outcome at RNC,
    is some nature of referendum on national direction--at a time when U. S. unemployment rates are in decline. An uptick in activity is recovering from the drought, even now! The White House has had to keep its mouth shut, on a number of occasions--especially in the search and destroy for Al Qaeda!

    Afghanistan has an occasional President, generally unable to get his own party to agree on which exemptions and deductions, are in the tax cut plan(?)! Afghanis are shown probably even more interested in the U. S. election, even way more than suddenly: The Conservative Republican analysts.

    The Republicans have two occasional candidates, possibly unaware that Afghanistan even exists!

    There are easily enough empty chairs, even now: To go around!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Maybe Rep Ryan put on his own empty head and bra, on Thursday(?)!)
     
  2. Full-Auto
    Offline

    Full-Auto Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    13,555
    Thanks Received:
    1,614
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,615
    The best advice.

    ERASE YOUR POST.....
     
  3. Freewill
    Offline

    Freewill Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    27,138
    Thanks Received:
    4,373
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +12,994
    You do realize that the Afghan war is all Obama? Before Obama we were achieving our goal without all the deaths we have seen since Obama's surge. Obama is lucky that Romney doesn't mention the war. It is a complement to the Republicans that they don't use the war for political means as witnessed by this post the left certainly does and did. Good for the Republicans to leave the war alone, bad for the liberals to try and make the sacrifice of our men into political fodder.
     
  4. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Style vs. Substance is already being used to describe the relative advantage of Romney over Obama in the Frenzy-On-Wednesday-Even-In-Denver!

    The Republicans had been losing it--and on substance. Romney even started waving his arms around: Even like McCain tries to do, when taking off. . . .like some birds anyone can think of.

    And then he would deny that his tax plan has any details--point out this tax plan calls for cuts and cuts in unspecified exemptions and deductions.

    Romney is shown in substance unable to deliver--including anything regarding troops in the field!

    The Republicans started it erroneously--basis free--and let the Al Qaeda leaders all go free! That is their brand!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Maybe Rep Ryan do hottchy-kootchey dance, and jiggle his. . . .(?)!)
     

Share This Page