- Thread starter
- #61
He's not asking about global warming. He's asking about Fox's dishonest coverage of global warming.
I was referring to the PBS article he referred to earlier. As for the report on Fox News and WSJ coverage of global warming issues, I have found both to be far more balanced and both at least report opposing points of view which LiveScience generally does not do. Therefore I have to place any criticism of Fox News by LiveScience into the category of needing far more verification from more reliable sources before I will accept their opinion.
Fox not only "reportopposing points of view". It treats them as if they're the scientific consensus.
I accept that as your opinion which may or may not be based on something more substantive than your opinion of Fox. I do not accept that as fact unless you can support it with something more than your opinion.