If you die in the corridor.....

HenryBHough

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
33,412
8,916
1,340
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
How does one properly categorize a death when the deceased perished in the corridor of a hospital whilst waiting for any sort of triage, let alone treatment?

Is it an accident?

Is it a suicide for having gone to the particular hospital/government health facility?

That's a question lots of British ordinary people are asking themselves:

NHS patients dying in hospital corridors, A&E doctors tell Theresa May

And a question for which Americans might have to consider if the left gets "one payer".....

Ponder THAT if your party allows "pondering" by peons.
 
single payer would make everything so much more efficient and less costly...

currently SO much money is wasted on administrative tasks, where money could be better spent serving the medical needs of the patient.
 
How does one properly categorize a death when the deceased perished in the corridor of a hospital whilst waiting for any sort of triage, let alone treatment?

Is it an accident?

Is it a suicide for having gone to the particular hospital/government health facility?

That's a question lots of British ordinary people are asking themselves:

NHS patients dying in hospital corridors, A&E doctors tell Theresa May

And a question for which Americans might have to consider if the left gets "one payer".....

Ponder THAT if your party allows "pondering" by peons.
Liberals don't give a shit about people, because liberals hate their very existence, so "at this point what difference does it make" that people are dying waiting to be seen in a hospital. There is no sanctity of life, for the most innocent victims are butchered and their parts sold for profit, so why should they feel any different for someone who took a risk by entering the British Hospital.
 
"NHS so 'chronically underfunded' and dangerously short-staffed...........

staff were so busy due to the sheer number of people needing care."
 
How does one properly categorize a death when the deceased perished in the corridor of a hospital whilst waiting for any sort of triage, let alone treatment?

Is it an accident?

Is it a suicide for having gone to the particular hospital/government health facility?

That's a question lots of British ordinary people are asking themselves:

NHS patients dying in hospital corridors, A&E doctors tell Theresa May

And a question for which Americans might have to consider if the left gets "one payer".....

Ponder THAT if your party allows "pondering" by peons.
suicide

they voted for it
knew this had been happening for YEARS
and they still insist on keeping it.


It's nice to know that stewpud is fatal.
 
How does one properly categorize a death when the deceased perished in the corridor of a hospital whilst waiting for any sort of triage, let alone treatment?

Is it an accident?

Is it a suicide for having gone to the particular hospital/government health facility?

That's a question lots of British ordinary people are asking themselves:

NHS patients dying in hospital corridors, A&E doctors tell Theresa May

And a question for which Americans might have to consider if the left gets "one payer".....

Ponder THAT if your party allows "pondering" by peons.

In the US we call them a Sentinel Event. They are investigated objectively and reviewed by JACHO, the governing body. Sentinel Events can be accidental but can also be the result of negligence.
 
single payer would make everything so much more efficient and less costly...

currently SO much money is wasted on administrative tasks, where money could be better spent serving the medical needs of the patient.

Are you ACTUALLY trying to get us to believe that government control will make it more efficient? Not even a lefty is dumb enough to believe that.
 
i'm not a lefty... what would they be "controlling" exactly?
 
you're good at parroting talking points but do you know how to think??
 
single payer would make everything so much more efficient and less costly...

currently SO much money is wasted on administrative tasks, where money could be better spent serving the medical needs of the patient.

Two points:

First, why do you think government run health insurance would involve less administrative tasks? (ie, what are you smoking?)

Second, so what? Do you really think the job of government is to make society more cost efficient?
 
single payer would make everything so much more efficient and less costly...

currently SO much money is wasted on administrative tasks, where money could be better spent serving the medical needs of the patient.

Two points:

First, why do you think government run health insurance would involve less administrative tasks? (ie, what are you smoking?)

Second, so what? Do you really think the job of government is to make society more cost efficient?
Photo-on-10-21-15-at-1.38-PM.jpg
 
"NHS so 'chronically underfunded' and dangerously short-staffed...........

staff were so busy due to the sheer number of people needing care."

Overworked and underfunded is how single payer will always be.

It's simply a matter of having a conversation around what we want.

Why does everyone have to want the same thing and be forced into something they don't want ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top