I'd enjoy an intellectual discussion-

[the other mike]

I rest my case.

 

[the other mike]

No sign of resistance at all when they started collapsing......

Weird.

 

[Gamolon]

I rest my case.

You have no case.

You just keep showing everyone your ignorance regarding the towers construction!

 

[Gamolon]

No sign of resistance at all when they started collapsing......

Weird.

Explain Angelo.

How does something falling due to gravity and experiencing no resistance fall at -6.31 m/s2! I supposed that's free fall to a truther eh?

 

[the other mike]

Explain Angelo.

How does something falling due to gravity and experiencing no resistance fall at -6.31 m/s2! I supposed that's free fall to a truther eh?

I'm not a truther, or a conspiracy theorist. I'm a truth seeker and a conspiracy analyst.

 

[danielpalos]

Now that we've settled that, what happened to the missing jolts ? Why was there no resistance from the underlying columns when the collapse initiated?

Your house of cards is an illusion.

The same reason the Surfside building collapsed when pieces of the building fell. The beams were not designed to support the weight of the impact.

 

[the other mike]

The same reason the Surfside building collapsed when pieces of the building fell. The beams were not designed to support the weight of the impact.

Your statement is illogical at best.

 

[danielpalos]

Your statement is illogical at best.

Thanks for your unsubstantiated opinion. Now, all you need do is support it with valid arguments. Have any?

 

[the other mike]

Gamolon likes to play games, then runs
off to troll a few other news boards.

 

[the other mike]

Thanks for your unsubstantiated opinion. Now, all you need do is support it with valid arguments. Have any?

"Withstand the weight of the impact" is an illogical statement. Grow a few more brain cells and you may understand.

 

[danielpalos]

"Withstand the weight of the impact" is an illogical statement. Grow a few more brain cells and you may understand.

Concrete pieces falling in the Surfside building is what brought down the rest of the building. The pieces must have been pretty heavy.

 

[the other mike]

Concrete pieces falling in the Surfside building is what brought down the rest of the building. The pieces must have been pretty heavy.

So if 1 plane hit at the top and the other plane hit in the middle , then how did they collapse almost identically the same way ?

Newton's Third Law of Motion

Newton's third law of motion describes the nature of a force as the result of a mutual and simultaneous interaction between an object and a second object in its surroundings. This interaction results in a simultaneously exerted push or pull upon both objects involved in the interaction.

www.physicsclassroom.com

 

[the other mike]

You can balance a 35lb cinder block on 4 toothpicks and even if you stood on top of it , the toothpicks would break but they wouldn't collapse straight down..... illustrates the strength of vertical columns.

 

[danielpalos]

So if 1 plane hit at the top and the other plane hit in the middle , then how did they collapse almost identically the same way ?

Newton's Third Law of Motion

Newton's third law of motion describes the nature of a force as the result of a mutual and simultaneous interaction between an object and a second object in its surroundings. This interaction results in a simultaneously exerted push or pull upon both objects involved in the interaction.

www.physicsclassroom.com

The planes must not have had enough force when compared to the strength of the building. And, once the collapse started, it continued under its own weight.

 

[danielpalos]

You can balance a 35lb cinder block on 4 toothpicks and even if you stood on top of it , the toothpicks would break but they wouldn't collapse straight down..... illustrates the strength of vertical columns.

All you need do is remove some wooden blocks for the rest to fall.

 

[the other mike]

The planes must not have had enough force when compared to the strength of the building. And, once the collapse started, it continued under its own weight.

If a fully loaded 18-wheeler had a head-on collision with an SUV, each traveling at 80 mph, both vehicles would come to a stop at the impact point. ( the suv would be pushed back a hundred feet or so, but it would stop the semi) .

 

[danielpalos]

If you had a pellet gun and shot out some of the blocks, the rest of the block tower would fall.

 

[the other mike]

If you had a pellet gun and shot out some of the blocks, the rest of the block tower would

Not if the inner core was made with an erector set

 

[danielpalos]

Not if the inner core was made with an erector set

A small caliber firearm could do it. Sufficient force is all it requires.

 

[the other mike]

A small caliber firearm could do it. Sufficient force is all it requires.

Out of curiosity, did you read the title of this thread ?

I believe the cartoon section is down a few levels.