Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too dumbfucks so simple minded they can't grasp this SIMPLE conspiracy theory.
And you morons purport to be in the know lol
So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Questioned on what exactly?Look -- what the FRIGGETY FUCK, dood?? It's your whole point here. And then as soon as you get questioned on it all you can do is go "who, me?"
Cheeses Christ on a CRACKER you're dense.
That is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Funny shit.Too dumbfucks so simple minded they can't grasp this SIMPLE conspiracy theory.
And you morons purport to be in the know lol
Admit you just fell for another story by WND, or The blaze without finding out about the whole story, and let it go. You are making yourself look like more of an idiot than usual.
I may have accidentally accredited your post to gramps. No offence intended toward you.So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Funny shit.Too dumbfucks so simple minded they can't grasp this SIMPLE conspiracy theory.
And you morons purport to be in the know lol
Admit you just fell for another story by WND, or The blaze without finding out about the whole story, and let it go. You are making yourself look like more of an idiot than usual.
I was just saying earlier how these absurd claims of me visiting other sites keep coming up.
Why are hacks so predictable?
Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Good god
Exactly the same. The only difference is you're too stupid to realize it.Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.So you don't find this a bit odd?I guess if anyone is an expert on bullshit, it would be you.
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Good god
Can't admit how wrong you are, can you? Doesn't matter. Everybody else can. Lying OP by a lying teabaggerExactly the same. The only difference is you're too stupid to realize it.Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.So you don't find this a bit odd?
Federal worker A crashes drone in violation of CURRENT LAW.
Then federal worker B insists on creating more laws?
Come the fuck on
Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Good god
Of course. That's why my posts are being thanked and yours aren't right?Can't admit how wrong you are, can you? Doesn't matter. Everybody else can. Lying OP by a lying teabaggerExactly the same. The only difference is you're too stupid to realize it.Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.Well, some companies were wanting to use drones for delivery. There would be a lot of commercial uses for them. They are outlawed in some places and by using this latest incident, the issue is back on the table, along with opportunity for more restrictions. They hate the idea of the private sector using these. They were supposed to be strictly spy toys for the government.
Good god
So, a few teabaggers are reading right now. This thread won't be closed any time soon. Many others will see it.Of course. That's why my posts are being thanked and yours aren't right?Can't admit how wrong you are, can you? Doesn't matter. Everybody else can. Lying OP by a lying teabaggerExactly the same. The only difference is you're too stupid to realize it.Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differentlyThat is a reasonable explanation. Nothing like your ridiculous claim that Schumer jumped on the crash to try to force some new unthought-of-before rules. Dumbass teabagger.
Good god
Idiot
ZzzzzzzzzzzSo, a few teabaggers are reading right now. This thread won't be closed any time soon. Many others will see it.Of course. That's why my posts are being thanked and yours aren't right?Can't admit how wrong you are, can you? Doesn't matter. Everybody else can. Lying OP by a lying teabaggerExactly the same. The only difference is you're too stupid to realize it.Bullshit. Not at all the same.She said the same damn thing I did you stupid fuck. She just worded it differently
Good god
Idiot
So a drone crashes on the Whitehouse lawn you say. Well it just so happens that a government employee has come forward to claim the drone as a simple recreational mistake.
End story right?
Hell no
Now chuck shummer is demanding the FAA step up their plans to put forth new regulations in response.
Step one: Create crisis
Step two: Take advantage of crisis
Step three: More freedoms gone
Pack this baby with 25 lbs of C-4 and the White House is toast.
Pack this baby with 25 lbs of C-4 and the White House is toast.
While this post is disturbing, to say the least, it does bring up a scary prospect.
Surely someone in security has thought of this possibility, I wonder what the plan is.
.
He always does.You are missing the point.You're right drones are illegal thanks to the republican controlled congress, senate, and white house of the 2000's. But you didn't complain then did you.So a drone crashes on the Whitehouse lawn you say. Well it just so happens that a government employee has come forward to claim the drone as a simple recreational mistake.
End story right?
Hell no
Now chuck shummer is demanding the FAA step up their plans to put forth new regulations in response.
Step one: Create crisis
Step two: Take advantage of crisis
Step three: More freedoms gone
Remember liberals.....Drones are already illegal in D.C. And the White House is already a no-fly-zone. Yet this incident happened anyway. Rules have already worked so well, more will be even better!
Sigh......