Hypocrisy Watch! Obama lied, guess who dies!

Discussion in 'Military' started by teapartysamurai, Jun 9, 2011.

  1. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,812
    Thanks Received:
    2,274
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,808
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?_r=1&hp

    I thought you libs were all against this War on Terror!

    You sure had a fit under Bush.

    You whined about how much money it cost, despite the fact Obama spent more on the Stimulus in 4 months than Bush did in seven years on the War on Terror.

    But, for some "strange" reasons, you guys are silent on Obama. In FACT, you are all happy he got Bin Laden.

    You guys sure you have your talking points straight??

    Are you against the War or aren't you?

    It couldn't be we were right and you phony liberals were only against the war for political reasons???????????

    Noooooooooooooooooooooooo, how could that be!!!!!

    Liberals are far too "noble" to do that . . . . . .

    Yeah!

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    95,846
    Thanks Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,150
    Obama spent more on the stimulus in 4 months than Bush spent on the war on terror in 7 years?

    Total spending in the stimulus package was about 500 billion (unless you want to count the tax cuts as spending).

    How much did Bush spend on the war on terror in 7 years?
     
  3. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    95,846
    Thanks Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,150
    Can you name the liberals here who were against the war on terror when Bush was president?
     
  4. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,245
    Thanks Received:
    19,821
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,326
    Libs always supported the war on terror. Did you see Bush's 88% approval rate in the months after 9-11 and the invasion of Afghanistan? Liberals opposed the strategic blunder of invading Iraq and were proven right.

    The Bush wars cost $2 trillion unfunded dollars, Obama spent $800 million on the stimulus. How can you say that is more? Also isn't $800 million spent on public works projects, policemen, firemen and teachers (not to mention $300 million in tax cuts) money better spent than invading a country that is not a threat and sacrificing 4000 American soldiers?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,812
    Thanks Received:
    2,274
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,808
    That's easy to substatiate!
    US Federal Deficit As Percent Of GDP

    2001 -1.25
    2002 1.48
    2003 3.39
    2004 3.48
    2005 2.52
    2006 1.85
    2007 1.14
    2008 3.18
    2009 9.91
    2010 10.64

    US Federal Deficit as percent of GDP - Charts Tables History


    Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war | Examiner Staff Writer | Beltway Confidential | Washington Examiner

    I can't wait to see how you will lie and spin your little paid DNC mouthpiece way out of this!

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


    Read more at the Washington Examiner: Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war | Examiner Staff Writer | Beltway Confidential | Washington Examiner
     
  6. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,812
    Thanks Received:
    2,274
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,808
    Are you telling me the Dems were FOR the War on Terror while Bush was in office?????

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  7. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,245
    Thanks Received:
    19,821
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,326
    Name any Dem that opposed the war on terror?

    Bush had unprecidented support both at home and abroad until he blundered into Iraq. it was the Dems who kept telling Bush to keep his eye on the ball and go to where the terrorists were in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We are doing it now and it is paying off big
     
  8. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    95,846
    Thanks Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,150
    No, I'm asking you to name the liberals here who were opposed to the war on terror when Bush was president.
    You said you thought ALL the libs here were opposed to the war on terror when Bush was president,

    so it shouldn't be hard for you to name names and back up your claim with evidence.

    Unless of course you're just trolling again, then you don't need evidence or facts.
     
  9. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    95,846
    Thanks Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,150
    1. Those numbers are based on CBO estimates. Are you now acknowledging that the CBO is a reliable source for estimated budget costs?

    2. Those numbers count the 288 billion in TAX CUTS that were in the stimulus bill as a COST.
    Do you now agree that tax cuts represent a cost? So when someone like me points out that the Bush tax cuts were a COST that added to the deficits,

    you agree?

    Let's establish your positions on those 2 issues, if you want to have a serious debate here.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,245
    Thanks Received:
    19,821
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,326
    Teapartysamurai

    Interesting assertion...

    Somehow in making this claim you only look at Iraq as the only expenditure on the War on Terror (the one event that had the least impact in the war on terror)

    Yet you ignore..
    - The War in Afghanistan
    - The establishment of the Homeland Security Department
    - Money spent on enhancing security at home states
    - Enhanced Airport Security (TSA)
    - Increases in budget for the CIA and NSA
    - Money spent on anti-terror military equipment

    Do you even know what the War on terror is?
     

Share This Page