Alexandre Fedorovski
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,536
- 1,164
- 210
"It is almost certain that a branch of the Iranian military - the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps - attacked the two tankers on 13 June. No other state or non-state actor could plausibly have been responsible", - said the British Foreign Office without citing a single piece of evidence. In such cases, it is said that the argument is "far-fetched" (Gulf of Oman attacks: UK statement ).
When US Secretary of State general Colin Powell lied to the American people and the international community about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in the presentation to the United Nations Security Council on February 5, 2003, he at least was holding a fake vial of anthrax, filled with detergent .
The British government does not consider it necessary to even do something like that. The objective argument that Iran is not interested in exacerbation of the international situation in its region is completely ignored. All this looks like a highly calibrated Hutspa.
When US Secretary of State general Colin Powell lied to the American people and the international community about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in the presentation to the United Nations Security Council on February 5, 2003, he at least was holding a fake vial of anthrax, filled with detergent .
The British government does not consider it necessary to even do something like that. The objective argument that Iran is not interested in exacerbation of the international situation in its region is completely ignored. All this looks like a highly calibrated Hutspa.