How to Beat the Fact-Checkers

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lakhota, Sep 21, 2012.

  1. Lakhota
    Online

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,789
    Thanks Received:
    4,719
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,101
    More: How to Beat the Fact-Checkers | Mother Jones
     
  2. Lakhota
    Online

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,789
    Thanks Received:
    4,719
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,101
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Vel
    Offline

    Vel Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    5,463
    Thanks Received:
    1,913
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Ratings:
    +1,914
    Sep 21, 2012 11:39am
    President Obama Falsely Claims Fast and Furious Program “Begun Under the Previous Administration”
    Asked about the Fast and Furious program at the Univision forum on Thursday, President Obama falsely claimed that the program began under President George W. Bush.
    “I think it’s important for us to understand that the Fast and Furious program was a field-initiated program begun under the previous administration,” the president said. “When Eric Holder found out about it, he discontinued it. We assigned a inspector general to do a thorough report that was just issued, confirming that in fact Eric Holder did not know about this, that he took prompt action and the people who did initiate this were held accountable.”
    Get more pure politics at ABCNews.com/Politics and a lighter take on the news at OTUSNews.com
    In actuality, the Fast and Furious program was started in October 2009, nine months into the Obama presidency.
    Previous programs involving ATF agents allowing guns to “walk” across the border so as to trace them were run during the Bush presidency, but not this particular “field-initiated program.”

    President Obama Falsely Claims Fast and Furious Program “Begun Under the Previous Administration” - ABC News
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. AmericanFirst
    Offline

    AmericanFirst Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,204
    Thanks Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +2,005
    Libtards hate facts more.
     
  5. Papageorgio
    Offline

    Papageorgio The Ultimate Winner

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    25,730
    Thanks Received:
    3,906
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Here
    Ratings:
    +9,559
    Mother Jones! :lmao: :lmao:

    Let us know when you use a site less nuttier than this one.

    You are funny"
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Trajan
    Offline

    Trajan conscientia mille testes

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2010
    Messages:
    29,048
    Thanks Received:
    4,751
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The Bay Area Soviet
    Ratings:
    +4,756
    :eusa_whistle:

    Lies, Damned Lies, and ‘Fact Checking’

    snip-



    Here’s a not-atypical case study. On November 7, 2010, newly elected Senator Rand Paul appeared on ABC’s This Week with Christiane Amanpour. One of the topics of discussion was pay for federal workers. “The average federal employee makes $120,000 a year,” Paul said. “The average private employee makes $60,000 a year.”

    Given that the news these days often boils down to debates over byzantine policy details, Paul’s statement is about as close to an empirically verifiable fact as you’re likely to hear a politician utter.

    And the numbers are reasonably clear. According to the latest data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis​—​yes, that’s a government agency​—​federal workers earned average pay and benefits of $123,049 in 2009 while private workers made on average $61,051 in total compensation. What’s more, the pay gap between the federal and private sectors has been growing substantially. A decade ago, average pay and benefits for federal workers was $76,187​—​federal civil servants have seen a 62 percent increase in their compensation since then, more than double the 30.5 percent increase in the private sector.

    So federal workers are paid twice as much and their income has been rising over twice as fast. If that’s not out- rageous enough, from December 2007 to June 2009, the federal workforce saw a 46 percent increase in the number of employees with salaries over $100,000, a 119 percent increase in the number of those making over $150,000, and a 93 percent increase in the number of federal civil servants making over $170,000. Note that these figures do not include benefits, overtime, or bonuses.

    Not only that, during Obama’s first two years in office, while the unemployment rate hovered near or above double digits, the size of the federal workforce increased by 7 percent. The president called for a federal pay freeze at the end of 2010; however, under the president’s supposed pay freeze, 1.1 million civil servants​—​the majority of the federal workforce​—​are still slated to get $2.5 billion in pay increases. And with the country on the verge of recession (again), 5 of the 10 richest counties in America now surround Washington, D.C. Given who the largest employer in the area is, this is hardly surprising.

    Not only is what Senator Paul said about federal pay verifiably true, his simple recitation of the most basic facts of the matter doesn’t even begin to illustrate the extent of the problem.

    Yet PolitiFact rated Senator Paul’s statement “false.” According to PolitiFact’s editors, because Paul did not explicitly say the figures he was citing include pay and benefits, he was being misleading. The average reader would assume he was only talking about salary. “BEA found that federal civilian employees earned $81,258 in salary, compared to $50,464 for private-sector workers. That cuts the federal pay advantage almost exactly in half, to nearly $31,000,” writes PolitiFact.

    So the average federal employee makes a mere $31,000 more a year in salary than the average private sector worker​—​but also gets a benefits package worth four times what the average private sector worker gets.

    more at-
    Lies, Damned Lies, and
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    the cons like trajan, ignore the con lies, and the libs, like lakota, ignore the lib lies.

    <yawn>

    obvious hacks are obvious
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Lakhota
    Online

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,789
    Thanks Received:
    4,719
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,101
    The Weekly Standard? More wingnut distortions, diversions and lies.
     
  9. Lakhota
    Online

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,789
    Thanks Received:
    4,719
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,101
    Actually, I much prefer facts and truth. However, in this lying wingnut environment one must fight fire with fire. It's sad when a former Mormon Bishop lies more than a hooker on crack.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2012
  10. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    you wouldn't know fact nor truth if they grew teeth and bit you on your bony ass, you lying fuckstick
     

Share This Page