How Can Senator Reid Be For ObamaCare: Similar As It Is To RomneyCare?!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mascale, Aug 16, 2011.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,033
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Others have noticed that a lot of ObamaCare is Heavily RomneyCare. Every so often, maybe one or another of them went to church, or temple, or the ammo dump or wherever their divine providence gets stored.

    Momons even have a name for it all, The Law of Consecration, wherein everything is actually of the divinity--and maybe the divinities, (they don't bring that up much, anymore): "And after ye have obtained a hope in Christ ye shall obtain riches, if ye seek them; and ye will seek them for the intent to do good--to clothe the naked, and to feed the hungry, and to liberate the captive, and administer relief to the sick and the afflicted." (Jacob 2:19)11

    The current Governor Romney, however, is not like Warren Buffet on the matter of taxing the rich. Obama is now for public works projects, like many of Eastern Seaboard elite. Obama is more like Buffet than Buffet on the matter of taxes, in fact. Like most original churches in the United States, the collectivist Mormons were relatively communist about the disposition of property. Acts 2 in the KJV is relatively communist about the disposition of property, which is about the early Israel, post-Christ, take on it. The Old Testament is rife with it, including on the matter of intrest rates, not to be charged for proft from the poor. Original Quaker communities created "sharing funds," now widely regarded as a source of "bail money." Originally, that was their Social Security, which they were for, before there was any.

    Great Prophet, Reverend Jeremiah Wright was likely smitten with a nip of the Consecration himself, for that matter. Mormons do cite the more redistributive parts of the New Testament in their various sermons and records.

    Senator Reid is mainly from Nevada, if not from Reno or Las Vegas. Governor Romney has his $250 mil. of winnings--apparently sought, so far, at least?! Mormon sermons and records acknowlege what Jesus told the rich young ruler, in the famous striving for moral self-improvement. The Governor maybe mainly needs to catch up on some reading.

    All kinds of new ascendancy is happening, now in office-holding in the United States. Governor Romney is miffed that President Obama should have called him about National Health Insurance. Soon likely President Obama will be miffed that Governor Romney should have called him about a traditionally moral tax plan for balancing the budget, and aiding the poor and the middle class! Senator Reid likely knows all about it.

    Warren Jeffs, maybe, doesn't know much about it. . . .either(?)!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Lands of Many Nations actually opposed to world international terrorism since 1492!)
     
  2. IHBF
    Offline

    IHBF BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    Thanks Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +154
    I read that whole thing. Every word. FML.

    Hey Mascale, practice what you preach and redistribute me some of what you've been taking.
     
  3. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,033
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    The Bachmann family likely, submissively, opposes these matters"

    Exodus 22:25-27 “If you lend to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like the money lender; charge him no interest. If you take your neighbor’s cloak as a pledge, return it to him by sunset, because his cloak is the only covering he has for his body. What else will he sleep on? When he cries out to me, I will hear, for I am companionate.”

    Leviticus 25:35-37 “If one of your countrymen becomes poor and is unable to support himself among you, help him as you would an alien or a temporary resident, so that he can continue to live among you. Do not take interest of any kind from him, but fear your God, so that your countryman may continue to live among you. You must not lend him money at interest or sell him food at profit.”

    The Bankers of the Bush Administration time in office themselves were not exactly giving it away. They even tried to sell the crap to the rich investors!

    The Presbyterians somehow came up with "laissez-faire,' in spite of all the coimmunisy and regulatory rules of the religions.


    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Many now come up with Lady Fair Submissively Submitted instead(?). . .at RNC!)
     
  4. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    80,363
    Thanks Received:
    6,868
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +14,989
    I think you are overanalyzing.

    The ironic thing about ObamaCare is that it does not look like RomneyCare by intent. If the Obama folks had their way, we'd have a Canada-style single payer health care system and big insurance would be out of the health care business. The political reality is that he couldn't accomplish that, because even a lot of Democratic Senators are in the pocket of big insurance.

    The thing is, a lot of conservatives had no problem with RomneyCare when it came out. The Heritage Foundation praised it. It is only because ObamaCare ended up looking a lot like it that it's gotten a bad rap.

    (And I don't like Romney, so no sympathy for him there.)

    The problem with health care in this country is that it's half socialist and half capitalist. If it were one way or the other, it'd work better. If it were all capitalist, some people wouldn't get treated, but the costs would come down through market forces. It it were all socialist, the government could dictate prices, and that would be that. But since government only controls half of it, the costs keep spiralling out of control.
     
  5. IHBF
    Offline

    IHBF BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    Thanks Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +154
    Mascale,

    Are you suggesting that the Jews who do not kill goyem as a sacrifice to G-D are nit being good Jews?

    Alkut Simoni (245c): "A Jew shedding the blood of a Christian is offering a sacrifice to God."

    Or does this supposed hypocrisy for not following a text written for people 2000 years ago only apply to white Christians?
     
  6. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,033
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    The United States is not like it was, now that only one theologiian is allowed in the federal birthday calendar, and one Jew.

    No Mormons are in it, maybe since they weren't baptized, or something.

    Jesus was like this, about the Laws of Moses:

    "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, Do not resist one who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and if any one forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to him who begs from you, and do not refuse him who would borrow from you. You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust." (Matthew 5:38:45

    The Laws of Moses were not about Jesus Christ, according to Jesus Christ!

    The Mormons don't teach that, or the Baptists. The Catholics mainly create Vedic crucifix depictions for their churches, without so-stating why: "Jesus comments unfavorably on The Laws of Moses.!" Then they sanction sexual predator stuff, like many would suspect that they probably would do.

    People like Governor Perry and the Bachmanns kept all the money, like many would suspect that they probably would do.

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Mormons in White Shirts and Ties Come to Lands of Many Nations: Needing to think they are on a mission tohelp out the one-armed bandits! Lands of Many Nations, have now converted to Western Ways!)
     
  7. dustythedog
    Offline

    dustythedog Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Arizona
    Ratings:
    +2
    How can you change a system that creates so much wealth. Everyone connected to the Health-care industry. Doctors, lawyers,drug companies, NBC,CBS,ABC,FOX, THEY ALL MAKE A FORTUNE. AND THEY ALL PREY ON PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK. Health care professionals should make a good living. But too many people are making too much money on the system. Too many politicians on both sides, are bought and paid for. Obamacare is doomed, neither side really wants it. All Obama cares about is his reelection. So far I haven't seen a republican capable of doing anything about the problem.
    Dusty the Dog
     
  8. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,033
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Probably no one reads ancient Chinese anymore, since the ancients are dead. Jesus more likely spoke Aramaic, and is famously dead. Fee-for-service medical payments: Actually reward doctors who can keep people sick, and paying doctors.

    Ancient Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who is dead: First created a national mandate of offering HMO plans as an alternative to fee-for-service. Ancient dead Chinese, per mythology, had set up a payment plan for their doctor priesthood wherein food and substance was provided when the people stayed healthty. If the people got sick, then prayer and fasting commenced. Mainly, Republicans understand best about real medical practice. The doctor priest would no longer receive any food sunstance. There was an incentive to get people healthy, ASAP.

    An HMO receives a fixed fee amount for each patient, regardless if patient is sick or healthy. The HMO profits if there are no exotic cures required. A logic of disease
    prevention is created.

    The complicating factor is new technology. Each individual HMO needs access to the new technology, even if it doesn't(?)! The resolution is a national health plan wherein one or more organizations has a specific technology specialty, with access available to other organizations.

    The creation of a national pool of insured is a cost-reduction measure. Mega-purchasing power is created, and planning with access is created..

    The Republicans are on record as being opposed to any such plan. ObamaCare or RomneyCare can make ends meet. The Republicans are opposed to any such concept. The Republicans claim that national risk and purchasing pools are only for a few--which clearly doesn't work in creating mega-purcashing power.

    The Republicans are an anti-purchasing power, anti-business party.

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Many young braves come to Lands of Many Nations! Seek religious practices of local medicine. . . specialist/dealers!)
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2011

Share This Page