How Can Justices Even Think In These Terms

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Dr Grump, Oct 21, 2009.

  1. Dr Grump
    Online

    Dr Grump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19,263
    Thanks Received:
    3,042
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    From the Back of Beyond
    Ratings:
    +4,182
    A dissenting opinion, but one held by justices nonetheless

    "This court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent."

    A case of innocence executed
     
  2. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,513
    Thanks Received:
    8,157
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,136
    Well, does the Constitution forbid it? I havent seen a clause that does.
     
  3. Dr Grump
    Online

    Dr Grump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19,263
    Thanks Received:
    3,042
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    From the Back of Beyond
    Ratings:
    +4,182
    But should it.....
     
  4. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    Should the constitution forbid execution of an innocent person?

    Is this really a rough question?
     
  5. BasicGreatGuy
    Offline

    BasicGreatGuy Aut libertas aut mors

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,284
    Thanks Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +427
    There is nothing wrong with that statement. If you oppose the death penalty, I understand that argument. However, it is a matter for the respective states to decide not the federal government, in my opinion.
     
  6. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    The appeals court is not the finder of fact. The petty jury is the finder of fact. Once they announce their verdict, the facts are established.
    This is why there is executive clemency, exactly for cases like that.
     
  7. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    136,659
    Thanks Received:
    12,295
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +32,180
    The Supreme Court has all original and appellate authority over matters constitutional (Article III). A matter of flawed due process or cruel and unusual punishment (which is certainly what execution of an innocent person would be) is certainly within the purview of the Supreme Court.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    not really...because the states aren't permitted to provide fewer constitutional protections than the federal government.
     
  9. Mad Scientist
    Online

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,936
    Thanks Received:
    5,211
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,676
    Lets if I understand this correctly:
    1. Man is convicted of murder.
    2. Man is given death penalty and executed in 2004.
    3. Evidence later proves his innocence.

    I'm not excusing it but I'll bet it wasn't the first time.

    Supreme Court says what it said when? Before he was executed? After?
     
  10. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    Another toilet-clogger from Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement. Hail, Jake!!
     

Share This Page