MissileMan
Senior Member
- Sep 11, 2004
- 2,939
- 224
- 48
GunnyL said:I think your argument that it is not a choice is fallacious.
So where are we NOW? IF there was conclusive evidence/proof either way, this wouldn't be an argument, would it?
"None of the above" would default to "normal;" which, equates to straight. Our ability to reason aside, we are animals. What is the biological function of animals in regard to sex? Procreation -- perpetuation of the species. This requires one male and one female. Animals who cannot or are unable to perform their bilogical reproductive function die, and their malfunction dies with them.
It doesn't matter whether it's genetic, or a choice -- it's aberrant behavior.
You guys all want to have it both ways. (pun intended) If orientation is a choice as you allege, why can't you provide any "testimony" about how you chose to be straight? The only way you can allege a choice is if you actually considered the other options.
You can try to spin it all you want to, but "none of the above" doesn't equal straight. "None of the above" equals asexual.
I can appreciate the adamant reluctance to consider homosexuality as anything other than a choice too. If it's ever determined without a doubt that homosexuals are born that way, Christians will be left with a contradiction of Biblical proportion (sorry, the puns keep rolling); if God creates homosexuals, how can he (through His word) condemn them?