namvet
Gold Member
one of many reasons im armed and dangerous
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I believe what I've stated. I don't measure my positions against that if the "left." Nor do I defend either the "left" or your imagination of "lefty" positions.LOLOLFine with me ... you're an imbecile.COME ON. Don't make me post link after link showing the decrease on social capital that is tearing this nation apart.
On some level you know it. Lets just cut to the end where you get all wiggly and dodge on out of the thread, while launching a bunch of personal attacks as chaff.
How's that?
Weak. You know that's not the standard Lefty dodge when the topic is immigration.
And as a lefty, you get MINUS points for any hint of originality.
Also, you haven't slammed America or American culture, thus hinting that it is not worth protecting, WHILE ridiculing the idea that it is under any threat. That is the core of the Lefty Position on this issue.
Seems you're eager to fight an argument I haven't made.
Sooo, are you claiming to NOT believe that?
Savvy?
You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.It implies no such thing. Your persistent dementia is noted. It means we welcome poor folks, as well as with others. We are still a nation of laws and nothing within the New Colossus implies any laws should be broken.You're fucking deranged.....Can you read? the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
Among the findings:
Welfare Use by Legal and Illegal Immigrant Households
- An estimated 49 percent of households headed by legal immigrants used one or more welfare programs in 2012, compared to 30 percent of households headed by natives.
- Households headed by legal immigrants have higher use rates than native households overall and for cash programs (14 percent vs. 10 percent), food programs (36 percent vs. 22 percent), and Medicaid (39 percent vs. 23 percent). Use of housing programs is similar.
- Legal immigrant households account for three-quarters of all immigrant households accessing one or more welfare programs.
- Less-educated legal immigrants make extensive use of every type of welfare program, including cash, food, Medicaid, and housing.
- The overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants have modest levels of education; therefore, the high use of welfare associated with less-educated legal immigrants indicates that legalization would likely increase welfare costs, particularly for cash and housing programs.
Within the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.....
THis is how it goes.
Lefties posts "poor huddled masses meme"
I point out that their message strongly implies support for an open border and unlimited immigration.
THey dishonestly deny that.
After several dozens pages, I get them to admit that the US has a finite ability to absorb immigrants.
Then they call me a racist, and let the matter drop.
The next day they pretend to forget that their position was debunked and they go back to spouting their silly talking points.
Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
one of many reasons im armed and dangerous
You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.It implies no such thing. Your persistent dementia is noted. It means we welcome poor folks, as well as with others. We are still a nation of laws and nothing within the New Colossus implies any laws should be broken.You're fucking deranged.....
Within the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.....
THis is how it goes.
Lefties posts "poor huddled masses meme"
I point out that their message strongly implies support for an open border and unlimited immigration.
THey dishonestly deny that.
After several dozens pages, I get them to admit that the US has a finite ability to absorb immigrants.
Then they call me a racist, and let the matter drop.
The next day they pretend to forget that their position was debunked and they go back to spouting their silly talking points.
Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
I believe what I've stated. I don't measure my positions against that if the "left." Nor do I defend either the "left" or your imagination of "lefty" positions.LOLOLFine with me ... you're an imbecile.
How's that?
Weak. You know that's not the standard Lefty dodge when the topic is immigration.
And as a lefty, you get MINUS points for any hint of originality.
Also, you haven't slammed America or American culture, thus hinting that it is not worth protecting, WHILE ridiculing the idea that it is under any threat. That is the core of the Lefty Position on this issue.
Seems you're eager to fight an argument I haven't made.
Sooo, are you claiming to NOT believe that?
Savvy?
You did not state your position on whether or not America and/or American culture was worth protection.
So, I asked you.
And I am still waiting for an answer.
I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.It implies no such thing. Your persistent dementia is noted. It means we welcome poor folks, as well as with others. We are still a nation of laws and nothing within the New Colossus implies any laws should be broken.You're fucking deranged.....
Within the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.....
THis is how it goes.
Lefties posts "poor huddled masses meme"
I point out that their message strongly implies support for an open border and unlimited immigration.
THey dishonestly deny that.
After several dozens pages, I get them to admit that the US has a finite ability to absorb immigrants.
Then they call me a racist, and let the matter drop.
The next day they pretend to forget that their position was debunked and they go back to spouting their silly talking points.
Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.It implies no such thing. Your persistent dementia is noted. It means we welcome poor folks, as well as with others. We are still a nation of laws and nothing within the New Colossus implies any laws should be broken.THis is how it goes.
Lefties posts "poor huddled masses meme"
I point out that their message strongly implies support for an open border and unlimited immigration.
THey dishonestly deny that.
After several dozens pages, I get them to admit that the US has a finite ability to absorb immigrants.
Then they call me a racist, and let the matter drop.
The next day they pretend to forget that their position was debunked and they go back to spouting their silly talking points.
Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
Sadly, you're too stupid to understand what you write...I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.It implies no such thing. Your persistent dementia is noted. It means we welcome poor folks, as well as with others. We are still a nation of laws and nothing within the New Colossus implies any laws should be broken.
Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
I never gave a reason why "because they are poor are your words" I said we are not obligated to accept anybody who's not a benefit to this country. We certainly shouldn't take in unlimited numbers of people who are going to be signing up for government of assistance..understand?
the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
Sadly, you're too stupid to understand what you write...I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.Illegals are breaking the law you support and defend them in their law breaking.
I never gave a reason why "because they are poor are your words" I said we are not obligated to accept anybody who's not a benefit to this country. We certainly shouldn't take in unlimited numbers of people who are going to be signing up for government of assistance..understand?
(emphasis added to aid the comprehension impaired)the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
Repeating your point only serves to prove you still don't get it. Here it is again, from the pedestal of Lady Liberty...Sadly, you're too stupid to understand what you write...I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poemMore idiocy... I defended no one breaking the law.
I never gave a reason why "because they are poor are your words" I said we are not obligated to accept anybody who's not a benefit to this country. We certainly shouldn't take in unlimited numbers of people who are going to be signing up for government of assistance..understand?
(emphasis added to aid the comprehension impaired)the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
The point was, to bring in people who benefit this country. Not people who go directly on government assistance ...I'm glad i could clear that up for you. You seem to be simpleminded and a little slow.
Repeating your point only serves to prove you still don't get it. Here it is again, from the pedestal of Lady Liberty...Sadly, you're too stupid to understand what you write...I implied no such thing and I'm certainly not responsible for how your rightarded brain translates my posts into your perceived implications. I never said anything about illegal aliens. I pointed out how your idiocy about the government not allowing in legal aliens because they're poor violates a core principle of America.You implied we were obligated to accept unlimited immigration because of a poem
I never gave a reason why "because they are poor are your words" I said we are not obligated to accept anybody who's not a benefit to this country. We certainly shouldn't take in unlimited numbers of people who are going to be signing up for government of assistance..understand?
(emphasis added to aid the comprehension impaired)the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
The point was, to bring in people who benefit this country. Not people who go directly on government assistance ...I'm glad i could clear that up for you. You seem to be simpleminded and a little slow.