Mr.Conley
Senior Member
We don't have to demonstrate that. We know that Saddam financed Hamas and gave money to the families of suicide bombers, but that does not demonstrate a tie between Bin Laden and Saddam. That is the important connection. Although Hamas and the other Palestanian terrorist organizations are bad, the best solution is continue to allow Israel to deal with them.Avatar4321 said:well considering its already been established that Saddam has links to Bin Laden and to terrorist groups why does this article have to demonstrate it?
But is that terrorist organization al-Quada? Most terrorist organizations are primarily concerned with some non-US related goal. This document, nor the resolution your present or proof that Saddam and Bin Laden closely cooperated on any level.Avatar=4321 said:Have you ever read UN Resolution 1441? It explicitely mentions that one of the reasons it was issued was because of Saddams connections with terrorism.
Ah, the standard, "I hate Liberals," bit. I don't think you're really trying to make a point here so much as bash people. Correct?Avatar4321 said:I cant figure out the Bush haters here. I mean there is plenty of evidence that Saddam had connections with terrorist groups. Yet he didnt, becausue for some reason the evidence presented by the news, the government, and the UN, not to mention Saddams own regime, is not enough to convince them.
Don't make stuff up in you antiLiberal rant.Avatar4321 said:There is physical evidence of Weapons of Mass destruction, yet they dont exist and Bush lied because "These arent the right ones"
eAvatar4321 said:We have mass graves created by Saddam, but we are thet bad ones for liberating the Iraqis from torture, rape, and genocide because some terrorists, murderers or thugs might not get the best treatment in the world.
The reason I supported the Iraq war was because of his crimes against humanity. You're speaking to the wrong crowd.
No one in this thread ever mentioned Vietnam. We are discussing Saddam's connection to Bin Laden, something that this article fails to demonstrate.Avatar4321 said:This is just Vietnam again despite the fact that its Nothing like Vietnam.
Not a bad Anti-Lib rant. Not very accurate, and it doesn't go off wildly into the unknown. I'll give it a 7.2/10 with 5 being average.Avatar4321 said:To be a Bush hater you have to throw all rational thought and objective analysis out the window. The only rule is does it make Bush look bad. It doesnt matter what it takes he has to look bad. There is nothing good about that line of reasoning and I am not going to let the left endanger America because they are having a tantrum over the President clearly and decisively winning both elections.