Hillary: "Religious beliefs have to be changed" to allow more abortions

I can't believe any mother with a friken soul or heart would crawl so low for ABORTIONS. this party is sick
 
I can't believe any mother with a friken soul or heart would crawl so low for ABORTIONS. this party is sick

fangirling.gif
 
"Reproductive rights" is liberal code for "abortion". The sycophants on this board think they can dismiss Hillary's statements because she used the term "safe childbirth" and refrained from using the term "abortion". I guess we're supposed to believe she's more concerned with childbirth than she is abortion, when her entire career and political agenda has been mainly focused on the killing of unborn children.


No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Or it means that someone's tired of proving the same thing over and over again to the same people, who every single time demand "verification" as if they haven't already seen it a thousand times.

Except it's not. It's just the same garbage over and over again. Misquoting, taking comments out of context, ignoring the details in favor of slanted headlines and never, under any circumstances, even making the slightest attempt at using their brain. It irritates me no end because it gives the impression that people with the IQ of a squirrel actually represent the conservative movement.

I truly wish we had listened to Goldwater because he had you twits totally figured out, and we are paying the price for it.
 
"Reproductive rights" is liberal code for "abortion". The sycophants on this board think they can dismiss Hillary's statements because she used the term "safe childbirth" and refrained from using the term "abortion". I guess we're supposed to believe she's more concerned with childbirth than she is abortion, when her entire career and political agenda has been mainly focused on the killing of unborn children.


No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Or it means that someone's tired of proving the same thing over and over again to the same people, who every single time demand "verification" as if they haven't already seen it a thousand times.

Except it's not. It's just the same garbage over and over again. Misquoting, taking comments out of context, ignoring the details in favor of slanted headlines and never, under any circumstances, even making the slightest attempt at using their brain. It irritates me no end because it gives the impression that people with the IQ of a squirrel actually represent the conservative movement.

I truly wish we had listened to Goldwater because he had you twits totally figured out, and we are paying the price for it.


As I've said before, I really do miss true Conservatives.
 
It's hard to tell what part of Hillary's recent statements are more appalling: Her usual desire to kill the unborn, or her disturbing announcement that normal Americans' personal religious beliefs can no longer be tolerated and "have to be changed".

This is what the Democrat party has been moving toward, for at least the last forty years.

Isn't there some old document that says government shall make no law doing exactly that?

And make no mistake, she isn't talking about persuading people over to her point of view willingly, or even voluntarily. Amidst her disingenuous description of killing unborn babies as "access to reproductive healthcare", is a stark statement demanding laws to change people basic religious beliefs... and government enforcement of those laws.

Perhaps the most surprising thing about her announcement, is not so much the content, as the timing.

Are liberals losing the debate so badly on so many fronts, that they have to declare unrestricted war on the most basic American fundamental principle?

-------------------------------------------------------

Hillary On Abortion Deep-Seated Cultural Codes Religious Beliefs And Structural Biases Have To Be Changed KOGO AM

Hillary On Abortion: 'Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs And Structural Biases Have To Be Changed'

Posted Friday, April 24th 2015 @ 9am
by Kerry Picket

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a feminist tone on Thursday. She told attendees at the sixth annual Women in The World Summit that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” for the sake of giving “access” to women for “reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth.”

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth an laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton said.

She explained, “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone — and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

She wants to change religious beliefs? .....and Muslims thought they had a problem with Republicans.
 
It's hard to tell what part of Hillary's recent statements are more appalling: Her usual desire to kill the unborn, or her disturbing announcement that normal Americans' personal religious beliefs can no longer be tolerated and "have to be changed".

This is what the Democrat party has been moving toward, for at least the last forty years.

Isn't there some old document that says government shall make no law doing exactly that?

And make no mistake, she isn't talking about persuading people over to her point of view willingly, or even voluntarily. Amidst her disingenuous description of killing unborn babies as "access to reproductive healthcare", is a stark statement demanding laws to change people basic religious beliefs... and government enforcement of those laws.

Perhaps the most surprising thing about her announcement, is not so much the content, as the timing.

Are liberals losing the debate so badly on so many fronts, that they have to declare unrestricted war on the most basic American fundamental principle?

-------------------------------------------------------

Hillary On Abortion Deep-Seated Cultural Codes Religious Beliefs And Structural Biases Have To Be Changed KOGO AM

Hillary On Abortion: 'Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs And Structural Biases Have To Be Changed'

Posted Friday, April 24th 2015 @ 9am
by Kerry Picket

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a feminist tone on Thursday. She told attendees at the sixth annual Women in The World Summit that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” for the sake of giving “access” to women for “reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth.”

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth an laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton said.

She explained, “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone — and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

It would definitely seem that her plan would violate the idea that church and state should be separated. Maybe government can't intermingle with church but what it should also go the other way such as the stae can't intermingle church. I think telling the church what it's doctrine should be is violating the principle nehind the first amendment.
 
"Reproductive rights" is liberal code for "abortion". The sycophants on this board think they can dismiss Hillary's statements because she used the term "safe childbirth" and refrained from using the term "abortion". I guess we're supposed to believe she's more concerned with childbirth than she is abortion, when her entire career and political agenda has been mainly focused on the killing of unborn children.


No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.
 
"Reproductive rights" is liberal code for "abortion". The sycophants on this board think they can dismiss Hillary's statements because she used the term "safe childbirth" and refrained from using the term "abortion". I guess we're supposed to believe she's more concerned with childbirth than she is abortion, when her entire career and political agenda has been mainly focused on the killing of unborn children.


No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.

A conservative - a real conservative - would oppose government interference in the personal choices of a woman. A conservative would say that is up to the woman involved and the government has no place in it. Because a real conservative is opposed to the government dictating how we live our lives. I don't expect you to understand that since you are not and have never been a conservative.

Which, of course, has absolutely nothing to do with what Clinton was talking about. And if you weren't lazy, dumb or both, you would have spent a few seconds to make that determination before you just accepted what you were told. You wouldn't now be ignoring the information that has been presented to you that what you were told was wrong, because that isn't what you want to hear. You're just another sheep being led around by the nose, because that's how you like it.

The conservative movement was once led by giants. Goldwater, Buckley, Eisenhower, Lodge, etc. You all now suck up to an ex-DJ whose only talent is to tell you that your petty hates and fears are justified. And our "leaders" trundle along behind you for fear they might not keep their power, each desperately trying to demonstrate they are even more stupid than the others. It makes me want to vomit.
 
Well, if to talk about abortions - i think that we shouldn't ban ALL abortions, because raped woman will never love her kid and there's no reason to this woman to give birth to this child, but we should make most of abortions - not cheap and stop funding!
 
"Reproductive rights" is liberal code for "abortion". The sycophants on this board think they can dismiss Hillary's statements because she used the term "safe childbirth" and refrained from using the term "abortion". I guess we're supposed to believe she's more concerned with childbirth than she is abortion, when her entire career and political agenda has been mainly focused on the killing of unborn children.


No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.

A conservative - a real conservative - would oppose government interference in the personal choices of a woman. A conservative would say that is up to the woman involved and the government has no place in it. Because a real conservative is opposed to the government dictating how we live our lives. I don't expect you to understand that since you are not and have never been a conservative.
This shows your ignorance on the subject. A conservative doesn't want government dictating how we live our lives, true, but that doesn't give you a green light to kill other human beings, you blithering idiot. Are you that f*ing stupid?
 
No, actually, its not. It means the right to choose to have a baby or not have a baby.

The OP is a lie.

What she said about OTHER COUNTRIES and NOTHING to do with abortion. If you and the other liars had read instead of just piling on, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself now.
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.

A conservative - a real conservative - would oppose government interference in the personal choices of a woman. A conservative would say that is up to the woman involved and the government has no place in it. Because a real conservative is opposed to the government dictating how we live our lives. I don't expect you to understand that since you are not and have never been a conservative.
This shows your ignorance on the subject. A conservative doesn't want government dictating how we live our lives, true, but that doesn't give you a green light to kill other human beings, you blithering idiot. Are you that f*ing stupid?

No. I'm a conservative. But you have no idea what that means because you are not and never have been. Nor will you take any time to find out what it means.
 
Nice try but everyone is familiar with Kankles' rabid promotion of abortion on demand and everyone knows when a liberal uses the term "reproductive rights", they're talking about abortion.

"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.

A conservative - a real conservative - would oppose government interference in the personal choices of a woman. A conservative would say that is up to the woman involved and the government has no place in it. Because a real conservative is opposed to the government dictating how we live our lives. I don't expect you to understand that since you are not and have never been a conservative.
This shows your ignorance on the subject. A conservative doesn't want government dictating how we live our lives, true, but that doesn't give you a green light to kill other human beings, you blithering idiot. Are you that f*ing stupid?

No. I'm a conservative. But you have no idea what that means because you are not and never have been. Nor will you take any time to find out what it means.
Conservatives don't advocate abortion. You're a liar.
 
"Everyone knows" is code for "I can't back up what I say and I'm too lazy to try". It isn't what liberals or conservatives do. It's what the lazy and dumb do.
Really? Then name some political candidate, elected official, or msm journalist who advocates women's "reproductive rights" who isn't a pro abortion advocate. I'll wait.

A conservative - a real conservative - would oppose government interference in the personal choices of a woman. A conservative would say that is up to the woman involved and the government has no place in it. Because a real conservative is opposed to the government dictating how we live our lives. I don't expect you to understand that since you are not and have never been a conservative.
This shows your ignorance on the subject. A conservative doesn't want government dictating how we live our lives, true, but that doesn't give you a green light to kill other human beings, you blithering idiot. Are you that f*ing stupid?

No. I'm a conservative. But you have no idea what that means because you are not and never have been. Nor will you take any time to find out what it means.
Conservatives don't advocate abortion. You're a liar.

Conservatives do not advocate government interference in the personal decisions of private citizens. You haven't a clue what conservatism is.
 
A lot of posters participating in this thread are showing exactly how gullible they are, particularly Little Acorn.
They never check anything out to see if it's true. If it gives them the opportunity to display their hate and dishonesty, well they are ready to be "all aboard" the bullshit train.
If Reid says the next republican nominee didn't pay his taxes. Are you gonna believe him again?
 
A lot of posters participating in this thread are showing exactly how gullible they are, particularly Little Acorn.
They never check anything out to see if it's true. If it gives them the opportunity to display their hate and dishonesty, well they are ready to be "all aboard" the bullshit train.
If Reid says the next republican nominee didn't pay his taxes. Are you gonna believe him again?

As I have stated on these boards quite often, 1, I have no love for either party; 2, I don't care for Reid at all (and that goes for about 99% of our elected representative/senators in Washington); 3, I really think hyper-partisans are the most gullible people on the planet.
My number 3, explains my post that you quoted.
 
And she will take all our guns, put us in concentration camps, make us communist slaves,...... Oh well, just the same old nonsense. I'm sure you can fill it in yourself.
I don't believe that anyone has the authority/right/pick a word, to say that anyone's religious beliefs should be changed.
I get G's point, in context, that she was referring to others but still.
As much as I disagree with Islam, it's not up to me to tell them to change their religious beliefs
 

Forum List

Back
Top