Hillary-free

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
I do not watch 60 minutes; I do not watch clips of Hussein or watch him giving speeches; I watch clips of Hillary Clinton when I learn she lied or said something outlandish. There was not a chance I would watch Clinton & Hussein together. No matter what they said I know by instinct that Suzanne Fields nailed it in 28 words:

CBS News should have employed the entire string section of the National Symphony Orchestra for enough violins to accompany its "60 Minutes" interview with Hillary and the president.

Hearts and Flowers for Hillary
Suzanne Fields
Feb 1, 2013

Hearts and Flowers for Hillary - Suzanne Fields - Page 1

Americans can be thankful for the blessing they are about to receive. The media shoved Hillary Clinton down the public’s throat for a bit more that twenty years starting with First Lady Clinton; then it was Senator Clinton, and finally Secretary of State Clinton. Unless Hillary takes up female mud wrestling the media is going to play hell keeping her in the public eye until the 2016 presidential campaigns begin in earnest. It’s the same thing as the media trying a fat-free diet. They know it’s good for the country, but they still have to sell fat.

Personally, I’m hoping for a Hillary-free year or so.

Naturally, Clinton will not disappear altogether. The MSM will use her as a filler on slow news days; Hillary goes for a walk; Hillary buys a jar of peanut butter, and so on. It won’t be the same as it was in her glory years when she admitted:


. . . she has been baking chocolate-chip cookies since she and her brothers competed to see who could produce the largest on Christmas.

Now Is the Time to Come to the Aid of Your Favorite Cookies - NYTimes.com

Now that her lies are in the public domain, now that the scandals are behind her, most Americans will say: WHO CARES.

Unfortunately, Socialists care. The global government crowd cares. They all know that 2016 is the last chance for President Hillary Clinton and UN Secretary General Bill Clinton to rule the world together. Nobody in the government media will report that those two will finish off America as a sovereign nation if Hussein does not beat them to it.
 
UPDATE

Alas, I was wrong in the OP. Hillary Clinton’s part in the Benghazi murders and coverup will keep her name in the news:

ONEILL050613.jpg

“Out, damned spot! Out, I say!”—William Shakespeare (1564?-1616), “Macbeth” Act V, Scene I

Hillary Clinton is having trouble getting rid of splattered blood stains.
Benghazi Blood Splatter
By Jim ONeill Monday, May 6, 2013

Benghazi Blood Splatter

Shakespeare still speaks to us across the ages. Lady Macbeth goes on to say:

What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account?

None of the blood and mud will stick to Hillary Clinton. The only thing she has to do is stand still and she’ll be washed clean by the media waterfall she lives under.

Last night, before Bill O’Reilly introduced Brit Hume he said this:


Latest polling has Clinton way out in front in the nomination in 2016. It's hers if she wants it. Widely believed that president Obama will help Clinton get off to an early and fast start in her quest to be president. Right now the only negative on current resume is the murder of the U.S. Ambassador in Libya.

The O'Reilly Factor - Monday, May 06, 2013 - Ark Livedash TV Transcript - Livedash - Search what is being mentioned across national TV

I did not know there is a Statute of Limitations on résumés. From the time Hillary Clinton was Arkansas’ first lady her résumé has been covered with filth. Remember cattle futures, the Rose Law Firm, Whitewater, and her handling so-called bimbo eruptions. And let’s not forget Vince Foster.

Since the media always scrubs Clinton clean there is no reason anyone will believe she lies as much as does her husband and Hussein. In fact, the bigger the liar the more support they get from rank & file Democrats.

Finally, only in Cuckooland would voters accept Irma Grese recommending Ilsa Koch for the commandant’s job:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvnPH_a_MU0&feature=player_detailpage]Nancy Pelosi: Hillary Clinton Would Be 'Best Qualified' To Run In 2016 - YouTube[/ame]​
 
Last edited:
Alas, I was wrong in the OP. Hillary Clinton’s part in the Benghazi murders and coverup will keep her name in the news.

I don't doubt the Republicans in their ham-handed way will garner more sympathy than blame for Hillary, guaranteeing her the presidency in 2016.
 
Alas, I was wrong in the OP. Hillary Clinton’s part in the Benghazi murders and coverup will keep her name in the news.

I don't doubt that the Republicans, in their ham-handed way, will garner more sympathy than blame for Hillary, guaranteeing her the presidency in 2016. :D
 
I almost have to sympathize with Bubba Bill. The image of Hillary screeching "what difference does it make" during a congressional hearing is enough to send chills up your spine. When you factor in the coverup that's beginning to unfold it's even more chilling. Should she go to jail if it is proved that she deliberately withheld assistance because of some convoluted political agenda?
 
I don't doubt the Republicans in their ham-handed way will garner more sympathy than blame for Hillary, guaranteeing her the presidency in 2016.

To konradv: You’re confusing legitimate questions about Benghazi with media-generated sympathy every time she gets caught doing something dirty. Should she get the nomination in 2016 the media will make her first campaign for the Senate look like she won in spite of the “tough New York press corps.” In case you forgot the election in 2000, the press covered her “listening tour” like she was the Virgin Mary when she should have been treated like Lucrezia Borgia.

Incidentally, she might win the general election with a tad more than the usual voter fraud, or the Republican party putting up another stiff like Romney, McCain, and Bob Dole. My money is on the latter.


Should she go to jail if it is proved that she deliberately withheld assistance because of some convoluted political agenda?

To whitehall: An interesting question. My non-lawyer guess is that her offenses will have to rise to the level of treason. If found guilty she might not go to jail, but she would lose all of her federal benefits; pensions, secret service protection, and so on.

At the very least she could be charged with reckless endangerment. I’m not sure if she can be brought into a federal court on that charge, and I seriously doubt if any secretary of state will ever see the inside of a jail cell because of reckless endangerment.
 
Why do you believe she gave stand down order, Flanders? Wouldn't she have received that order directly from Obama? Why would he want them to stand down and not rescue the American Ambassador and others?
 
Why do you believe she gave stand down order, Flanders? Wouldn't she have received that order directly from Obama? Why would he want them to stand down and not rescue the American Ambassador and others?

To Jeri: The order could have originated with Hussein, or Secretary of Defense Panetta who also had authority over any rescue effort carried out by the military. Or it could have been a joint decision. You have to start somewhere. Clinton is the logical choice.

The real questions is: Are the dominoes wobbling? If so, somebody has to fall on their sword before the whole damned administration goes down in flames. In that sense remember that Hussein is not running for reelection; so I’m expecting him to take “full responsibility” without admitting anything. Benghazi is shaping up like the Waco Massacre. The president is responsible and nobody gets punished.
 

Forum List

Back
Top