- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,823
- 350
What a shock! Not!!
This has been known for some time. No way in hell congress members are unaware of the fact that an armed populace means less crime. So, it isn't about our safety. Never was about that. Armed people are the only thing that dictators fear.
The truth is, and always shall be, that whoever wants to disarm you wants to control you. I wish the idiot leftists would understand that. There is a reason for the 2nd amendment. Our forefathers knew that we needed the ability to fight for our freedom and liberty against a corrupt government. When I see the likes of Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and others praising a one world government and wanting to disarm us, I realize that they are the very kind of people our forefathers ran from and the ones they warned us about.
Used to be anyone who talked about one world order or one world government was told to take their tin foil hat off. Now, Hillary and the others openly talk about the virtures of one world government.
We have the U.N. trying to make international laws and forcing us to follow them, despite the fact that they go against our constitution. They want to control the world, literally. That is where a one world government would begin and where all of our freedom and liberty would end. One government ruling over a socialist/communist world. The wet dream of today's left.
Trump had every right and reason to refuse entry to those trying to sneak through the border. The liberal puke who stopped him is just another activist judge making his own rules from the bench. Doesn't give a shit about our nation's laws. This kind of shit is why Dems have to cheat to win elections these days. While there are too many indoctrinated idiots running around, there aren't quite enough to hand them control over the world yet. That is why they want all these ignorant people to flood the country. The Alinsky rule is to allow illegals to pour in and overwhelm our system. That is well underway. Another rule is to indoctrinate youth by teaching social justice instead of actual skills, like math and science. Common Core took care of that. Math scores at an all-time low since that was implemented. Another rule is to promote abortions (population control), government-run healthcare (more population control), encourage more dependency on government by promoting an entitlement mentality, and government slowly seizing control over the private sector by increased interference and regulations, and control over energy (fake solutions for global warming). It was suggested for the latter that they conjure up a problem that affects the entire world and then take over power and energy as a supposed solution.
Every damn thing the left is doing is straight from Cloward-Piven or Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. It's clear that liberals don't read much. Otherwise, they would have a fucking clue about what government is actually up to since it's literally straight from the radical's handbook.
Guns are always a high priority because as long as the populace is armed, they won't give up their freedoms.
It would not surprise me in the least if some of the shooters (all with crazy eyes) were coaxed into doing it just so the left could instill fear in everyone when it comes to guns.
It's not the guns that cause the problems. Guns are only a huge problem for wannabe dictators.
When people are armed, there is less crime. Many of us have known this for years. Of all places, this study came out of Harvard, which is undoubtedly liberal. But, facts are facts and they cannot be denied.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens.
“The study was overlooked when it first came out in 2007,” writes Michael Snyder, “but it was recently re-discovered and while the findings may not surprise some, the place where the study was undertaken is a bit surprising. The study came from the Harvard Journal of Law, that bastion of extreme, Ivy League liberalism. Titled Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?, the report “found some surprising things.”
The popular assertion that the United States has the industrialized world’s highest murder rate, says the Harvard study, is a throwback to the Cold War when Russian murder rates were nearly four times higher than American rates. In a strategic disinformation campaign, the U.S. was painted worldwide as a gunslinging nightmare of street violence – far worse than what was going on in Russia. The line was repeated so many times that many believed it to be true. Now, many still do.
Today violence continues in Russia – far worse than in the U.S. – although the Russian people remain virtually disarmed. “Similar murder rates also characterize the Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and various other now-independent European nations of the former U.S.S.R.,” note Kates and Mauser . Kates is a Yale-educated criminologist and constitutional lawyer. Dr. Mauser is a Canadian criminologist at Simon Fraser University with a Ph.D. from the University of California Irvine. “International evidence and comparisons have long been offered as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths. Unfortunately, such discussions are all too often been afflicted by misconceptions and factual error.”
Read more at Harvard University Study Reveals Astonishing Link Between Firearms, Crime and Gun Control
Harvard University Study Reveals Astonishing Link Between Firearms, Crime and Gun Control
This has been known for some time. No way in hell congress members are unaware of the fact that an armed populace means less crime. So, it isn't about our safety. Never was about that. Armed people are the only thing that dictators fear.
The truth is, and always shall be, that whoever wants to disarm you wants to control you. I wish the idiot leftists would understand that. There is a reason for the 2nd amendment. Our forefathers knew that we needed the ability to fight for our freedom and liberty against a corrupt government. When I see the likes of Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and others praising a one world government and wanting to disarm us, I realize that they are the very kind of people our forefathers ran from and the ones they warned us about.
Used to be anyone who talked about one world order or one world government was told to take their tin foil hat off. Now, Hillary and the others openly talk about the virtures of one world government.
We have the U.N. trying to make international laws and forcing us to follow them, despite the fact that they go against our constitution. They want to control the world, literally. That is where a one world government would begin and where all of our freedom and liberty would end. One government ruling over a socialist/communist world. The wet dream of today's left.
Trump had every right and reason to refuse entry to those trying to sneak through the border. The liberal puke who stopped him is just another activist judge making his own rules from the bench. Doesn't give a shit about our nation's laws. This kind of shit is why Dems have to cheat to win elections these days. While there are too many indoctrinated idiots running around, there aren't quite enough to hand them control over the world yet. That is why they want all these ignorant people to flood the country. The Alinsky rule is to allow illegals to pour in and overwhelm our system. That is well underway. Another rule is to indoctrinate youth by teaching social justice instead of actual skills, like math and science. Common Core took care of that. Math scores at an all-time low since that was implemented. Another rule is to promote abortions (population control), government-run healthcare (more population control), encourage more dependency on government by promoting an entitlement mentality, and government slowly seizing control over the private sector by increased interference and regulations, and control over energy (fake solutions for global warming). It was suggested for the latter that they conjure up a problem that affects the entire world and then take over power and energy as a supposed solution.
Every damn thing the left is doing is straight from Cloward-Piven or Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. It's clear that liberals don't read much. Otherwise, they would have a fucking clue about what government is actually up to since it's literally straight from the radical's handbook.
Guns are always a high priority because as long as the populace is armed, they won't give up their freedoms.
It would not surprise me in the least if some of the shooters (all with crazy eyes) were coaxed into doing it just so the left could instill fear in everyone when it comes to guns.
It's not the guns that cause the problems. Guns are only a huge problem for wannabe dictators.
When people are armed, there is less crime. Many of us have known this for years. Of all places, this study came out of Harvard, which is undoubtedly liberal. But, facts are facts and they cannot be denied.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens.
“The study was overlooked when it first came out in 2007,” writes Michael Snyder, “but it was recently re-discovered and while the findings may not surprise some, the place where the study was undertaken is a bit surprising. The study came from the Harvard Journal of Law, that bastion of extreme, Ivy League liberalism. Titled Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?, the report “found some surprising things.”
The popular assertion that the United States has the industrialized world’s highest murder rate, says the Harvard study, is a throwback to the Cold War when Russian murder rates were nearly four times higher than American rates. In a strategic disinformation campaign, the U.S. was painted worldwide as a gunslinging nightmare of street violence – far worse than what was going on in Russia. The line was repeated so many times that many believed it to be true. Now, many still do.
Today violence continues in Russia – far worse than in the U.S. – although the Russian people remain virtually disarmed. “Similar murder rates also characterize the Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and various other now-independent European nations of the former U.S.S.R.,” note Kates and Mauser . Kates is a Yale-educated criminologist and constitutional lawyer. Dr. Mauser is a Canadian criminologist at Simon Fraser University with a Ph.D. from the University of California Irvine. “International evidence and comparisons have long been offered as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths. Unfortunately, such discussions are all too often been afflicted by misconceptions and factual error.”
Read more at Harvard University Study Reveals Astonishing Link Between Firearms, Crime and Gun Control
Harvard University Study Reveals Astonishing Link Between Firearms, Crime and Gun Control
