Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
well well, remember how they called you crazy for suggesting this very thing? in fact they dropped the ball completely on Obama and should be held to account for the mess we are in today....they have become our enemies..
links in article at site
SNIP:
Laura Ingraham had Time Magazines Mark Halperin on The OReilly Factor tonight to talk about the magazines new cover:
The cover, and what Ive heard of the story read like, well, this site did about five years ago, and four years ago, and three years ago, and you get the point. But back then, any knock on Obamacare from critics was mean-spirited, lies, fear-mongering, and possibly racist. Ingraham asks about that.
Im always amazed how detached someone like Halperin can be while criticizing the media for an historic dereliction of duty. He is part of the Washington press corps. As Game Change and Double Down illustrate, hes one of those with the highest access. And, yet, he couldnt possibly ask more questions about Obamacare back when it mattered? No. Because Mitt Romney.
ALL of it here
Halperin: There?s no doubt press failed to scrutinize Obamacare until now « Hot Air
links in article at site
SNIP:
Laura Ingraham had Time Magazines Mark Halperin on The OReilly Factor tonight to talk about the magazines new cover:
The cover, and what Ive heard of the story read like, well, this site did about five years ago, and four years ago, and three years ago, and you get the point. But back then, any knock on Obamacare from critics was mean-spirited, lies, fear-mongering, and possibly racist. Ingraham asks about that.
INGRAHAM: Thats part of the issue, is it not? The President always seems to see things in terms of political solutions or political responses. So the response here is we have got to rebrand. We have got to sell it differently. We have to have a new ad, have to have the website have more colors, whatever it is. Isnt it more of a branding problem? This is a technical problem. Its a policy problem. Its a substantive problem. Its not just about whether Obamas big legacy is intact or progressive ideas in the future are doing well. These are real concerns that were expressed frankly back in 2008, 2009, and into 2010. Forgive me, but I dont think Time Magazine was doing cover stories on a lot of concerns that were raised back then that were routinely dismissed by many in the media, ideological, as just mean-spirited, turns out most of the Republican concerns about Obamacare were right.
HALPERIN: Laura, there is no doubt that the press failed to scrutinize this program at the time of passage and during the context of the presidents re-election. Any reporter who would argue otherwise would be putting their head in the sand. As we write in Double Down, the problem for the Republicans in the re-election context was you nominated, Republicans nominated Mitt Romney, a guy who was not very well positioned, to say the least, to make the case against Obamacare because he passed the healthcare plan in Massachusetts.
Im always amazed how detached someone like Halperin can be while criticizing the media for an historic dereliction of duty. He is part of the Washington press corps. As Game Change and Double Down illustrate, hes one of those with the highest access. And, yet, he couldnt possibly ask more questions about Obamacare back when it mattered? No. Because Mitt Romney.
ALL of it here
Halperin: There?s no doubt press failed to scrutinize Obamacare until now « Hot Air