- Banned
- #61
It wasn't a link, lol I just underlined it manually.
Try this:
Surveyed scientists agree global warming is real - CNN.com
Excellent article, thanks a bunch!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't a link, lol I just underlined it manually.
Try this:
Surveyed scientists agree global warming is real - CNN.com
Shilling for the oil companies is no different than saying Gore is doing it for the money.
And I am sorry...but I disagree....it is not the majority of the world scientific community.....there are as many that disagree as agree.
No different than the fact that there were as many economists that disagreed with the stimulus that agreed with it.
Shilling for the oil companies is no different than saying Gore is doing it for the money.
And I am sorry...but I disagree....it is not the majority of the world scientific community.....there are as many that disagree as agree.
No different than the fact that there were as many economists that disagreed with the stimulus that agreed with it.
Actually, as per Cuyo's link, 90% of the world scientific community agrees. Of course, I'm sure there's a wide margin of error on that poll, but let's say it's off by 10%... that's still 80% of the world scientific community...
I will read the article....but I must question whether or not that is based on the data that some have already proven to be skewed.
I am sure that 100% of the scinetific community does not actually analyze and collect data...they theorize based on data offered to them....and their hypotheses are based on the accuracy of the data offered to them.
I am sure you see my point there?
Like other fuel-cell technology, the Bloom box produces electricity through an electrochemical process that uses hydrogen, natural gas, methane, or other fuel. Power is produced at a fraction of the emissions of a typical power plant and the fuel-to-electricity efficiency is much higher, from 50% to 70%. In applications designed to capture and use the system's waste heat, which is as high as 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit, the overall fuel use efficiencies could top 80% to 85%.
And apparently, the left wing ignorance, which is the same EVERY week, is to defend a fraud.
However, if the Global Warmers of the world were somehow representative of the right, I wouldn't be surprised if you would be on the opposing side of it. Regardless of which side of the political spectrum it fell on, I would be the first to call it GARBAGE and SHAMEFUL to profit from it.
The fact that you can't admit that Gore and all the others who manipulated data in an attempt to establish a theoritcal outcome as fact is laughable.
And if Al Gore and the majority of the World Scientific community are CORRECT, then by your logic Sen Inholfe and anyone else shilling for the Oil Companies are guilty of "Fraud", and should be criminally liable. Correct?
And apparently, the left wing ignorance, which is the same EVERY week, is to defend a fraud.
However, if the Global Warmers of the world were somehow representative of the right, I wouldn't be surprised if you would be on the opposing side of it. Regardless of which side of the political spectrum it fell on, I would be the first to call it GARBAGE and SHAMEFUL to profit from it.
The fact that you can't admit that Gore and all the others who manipulated data in an attempt to establish a theoritcal outcome as fact is laughable.
And if Al Gore and the majority of the World Scientific community are CORRECT, then by your logic Sen Inholfe and anyone else shilling for the Oil Companies are guilty of "Fraud", and should be criminally liable. Correct?
What do you mean "IF"?? Al Gore doesn't say "IF". There's no IF in global warming!!!
Are you saying that the only disagreement with the GW'ers is to keep the oil companies going? Are we to believe that GW is going to shut down the oil industry???
PLEASE!!!!!!! But if it makes you feel better...YES...any fraud committed by Inholfe should be investigated and if found to be legitimate, should be prosecuted. Just know that it won't, because you'd have to prosecute almost every polititcian in the last 40 years...
Al Gore has made MILLIONS....M I L L I O N S on this. And if you think he's going around say "IF I'm right" then you haven't been listening. He's quoted every source, credible or not, he can find to try to solidify his position so he can keep selling books, making movies and booking speaking engagements. He's as guilty as a drug dealer!
Only he's not just looking for junkies, he's trying to infect the whole world with this shit.
He's a heretic! Lock his ass up!
(See also: Galileo)
Thanks for posting this thread. It demonstrates two points, 1) republican senators are not climate experts and 2) they waste time and money as they eat at the corporate trough.
I will tell him that on his site soon.
==================================
BBC - Ethical Man blog: In praise of scepticism
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Excllent piece 400,000 year view global warming
James Balog: Time-lapse proof of extreme ice loss | Video on TED.com
"Yes. Earth is already showing many signs of worldwide climate change... Average temperatures have climbed 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degree Celsius) around the world since 1880, much of this in recent decades, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies."
Global Warming Fast Facts
all those highly trained scientists making it all upROFL, you do realize that, if anything, it's Inholfe who's the "Flat Earther" in this scenario, right?
Gore would be the one promoting the new scientific theory, or the "World is Round" type argument, while Inholfe and the rest of you are the "World is Flat" crowd.
No matter who is correct, that is the situation.
You do realize, that there is no proof that MAN has anything to do with temperature change on a global scale, right?
No you don't, which is why people like you are flat earthers, you 'invented' a problem and solutions to it, without first proving the problem exists.
Yeah......right.........because it snowed in DC and Florida.
Did you stop to consider that the Olympics in Vancouver were SUPPOSED to have snow, yet didn't? They had to truck it in and make it themselves.
DC isn't supposed to snow like it did, and Vancouver was but didn't.
Yeah you stupid bitch kee kee, tell me again how much it's a "hoax". Where did you grow up, because apparently the educational system where you came from SUCKED, as it didn't teach you critical thought.