GOP Opposed Health Care Tax Credit For Small Businesses: Saying, "Nyet!"

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The Confiscatory GOP, not on board with the New World Sociialist, Global Economy: As is usual : Even said "No" to targeted tax relief for small businesses. That is in the Health Plan legislation, starting this year.

The targeted small businesses, eligible for the Democratic Health Care tax credit, provide health plans at this time. The main new regulated exchange: Doesn't start until 2014. That will be health care relief for most U. S. businesses. For small businesses, starting this year, until that year, The Democrats have a tax credit in the pro-business plan.

The GOP clearly voted "No," since the small business owners--that they don't want around in America--get immediate tax relief! The GOP therefore: All voted "No!" The New Tea Party is clearly opposed to small business owners, and their employees with the health plans, since to them that that is Socialism. They oppose the Health Care Tax Credits, for small business owners: In their campaigns! They call it Socialism.

Health care tax credits for small businesses - Sep. 22, 2010

Their major start star, Widely Famous Abraham Lincoln, was actually against small business owners, and their employees, from the start. The rich mega-bankers, and giant company owners, and multi-farm owners, could buy their way out of the military. Everybody else got killed, maimed, or wounded: Which is fairness to GOP, even now.

Blacks were also more or less exempted, so that in GOP Fairness, mainly white people were the victims. The blacks were still considered private property--in some Constituional Language that could be read.

Anyone notices that with tax relief already already on the books, for small business owners: That Republicans are suing to block the small business tax credits, now just starting out, or running on the basis that the relief should be repealed.

Whereas the original Party of Abraham Lincoln would at least kill hundreds of thousands of White People off, The New Tea Party of Abraham Lincoln is more into wishing them all a grisly, warming, dismal life instead. Even without water, and with poison eggs: They are even on board for that, which required socialist, intervention to solve.

The Great Socialists of China know that in order to re-value, even the yuan, then incomes also have to be raised for the working rank and file. It will still be the yuan, and there are rich people driving up prices, and values, at this time. Even though lthe Chinese ower incomes will be more valueable on the world market: Mostly the Chinese, ordinary workers, are not making purchases in all the other nations.

The GOP, and is new Tea Party, are famously on board for the billions in banker bonuses that Bush-Cheney-Paulson-McCain-Palin created, who also supported the murdering "Surge" in Iraq. The mega-billion dollar bonus money came from taxpayers, and did not go to small business owners, and their employees.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many Nations,not get benefit of New China tourists, even! Hmmm! Many squaws not standing up to bandits, in America!)
 
But but but but but but what happened to the 2,500% savings from switching to ObamaCare?

I had forgotten that gem!

"One of the central promises President Obama made during the presidential campaign was that he would “sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of [his] first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premium by up to $2,500 a year.”

Politifact.com, “Barack Obama Campaign Promise No. 521: Cut the Cost of a Typical Family’s Health Insurance Premium by up to $2,500 a Year,” updated December 1, 2009, at PolitiFact | Cut the cost of a typical family's health insurance premium by up to $2,500 a year - Obama promise No. 521: (September 21, 2010).
 
The famous Republican version of "savings" for Americans was made famous when Senator Joe Biden, of pre-witchcraft Deleware--noticed that the Republican war-makers in Iraq were not providing U. S. troops adequate equipment, or personal protection armor.

That is the only kind of savings, allowed for Americans--making less than $200,000.00 per year--when Republicans do anything in government. Mega-Kazillions for Billionaires and Billionaires+ and the millionaires: Is what The GOP means by "savings for" Americans. Budgetary items, for middle and lower income Americans, are never provided in their plans.

In The Bush Tax Cuts, Only For The Mega-Rich, and not for 40% of filers: The Republicans couldn't even figure out why their tax cuts didn't work. Osama bin laden is still around, to make Republicans create murders that work for, as is usual and customary, for them. Osama bin laden went one way. The Republicans sent the troops in opposite direction! Everyone sees how Tea Party GOP made Osama bin laden their ally!

Famous Republican, Abarham Lincoln--of the famous cemetery speech fetish--even allowed that the rich could buy their way out of the military, such as they were famously, refusing to supply it, as is usual with them.

There are also deficit reduction mesures, in the National Health Plan. Those are what the Democrats put in it. The Republicans all said, "No," unless the Democrats were going to let them do it their usual, and customary: Way instead. The Democrats are said by Republicans to have not included their usual tax-dollar bonuses for mega-billionaires, and "savings" at the expense of the people: In their customary, and usual, way.

The Obama Administration had to do negotiation--not a Tea Party of Abraham Lincoln-level skill--even between the Blue Dogs and the Liberals: Before the thing was over.

And in the end, Not one Democrat even suggested: Burning one another at the stake as an option!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Delaware Democrats. . . Hmmm. . .now stir pots in Party of Abraham Lincoln(?)!)
 
Last edited:
The famous Republican version of "savings" for Americans was made famous when Senator Joe Biden, of pre-witchcraft Deleware--noticed that the Republican war-makers in Iraq were not providing U. S. troops adequate equipment, or personal protection armor.

That is the only kind of savings, allowed for Americans--making less than $200,000.00 per year--when Republicans do anything in government. Mega-Kazillions for Billionaires and Billionaires+ and the millionaires: Is what The GOP means by "savings for" Americans. Budgetary items, for middle and lower income Americans, are never provided in their plans.

In The Bush Tax Cuts, Only For The Mega-Rich, and not for 40% of filers: The Republicans couldn't even figure out why their tax cuts didn't work. Osama bin laden is still around, to make Republicans create murders that work for, as is usual and customary, for them. Osama bin laden went one way. The Republicans sent the troops in opposite direction! Everyone sees how Tea Party GOP made Osama bin laden their ally!

Famous Republican, Abarham Lincoln--of the famous cemetery speech fetish--even allowed that the rich could buy their way out of the military, such as they were famously, refusing to supply it, as is usual with them.

There are also deficit reduction mesures, in the National Health Plan. Those are what the Democrats put in it. The Republicans all said, "No," unless the Democrats were going to let them do it their usual, and customary: Way instead. The Democrats are said by Republicans to have not included their usual tax-dollar bonuses for mega-billionaires, and "savings" at the expense of the people: In their customary, and usual, way.

The Obama Administration had to do negotiation--not a Tea Party of Abraham Lincoln-level skill--even between the Blue Dogs and the Liberals: Before the thing was over.

And in the end, Not one Democrat even suggested: Burning one another at the stake as an option!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Delaware Democrats. . . Hmmm. . .now stir pots in Party of Abraham Lincoln(?)!)

Oh, so that's why the Democrats tried at least on 47 separate occasions to cut funding for our troops...

So how's Biden's idea to slip Iraq into 3 separate states working out?
 
It is not that we object to the concept of tax relief, we object to tax relief for the politically connected. In effect, new loopholes.

Tax relief should be general and universal. Tax relief for some lucky body means that everyone else pays more.
 
What the Democrats actually came up with is a regulated market for health insurance. At RNC, the GOP puts out that it is for a regulated market. When it comes to regulating the market, then they famously refuse.

There is deficit reduction in the National Health Insurance Plan. The Republicans are for that at RNC. When it comes to voting for deficit reduction, then they famously refuse.

There are tax cuts, clearly, in the National Health Insurance Plan. The Republicans are for that at RNC. When it comes to voting for tax cuts, clearly: Then they famously refuse.

The Democrats want to keep the tax cuts already in the code for middle and lower income filers. The Republicans are for that, only if Kazillionaires get far more than the middle and lower income filers.

That has been famously, current events, for weeks. Finally the Democrats will get to vote for the small business bill, finally this week. The Republicans are for small business at RNC. When it comes to actually voting on their behalf: It takes a ton of hay for the jackass party: To even get the elephant to wiggle its tail!

Finally the Tea Party winner in Delaware, even called them lazy! "No" is not a form of exercise, even to them.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred !"
(Nothin' . . . says lovin'. . . .like somethin' from the oven!. . . .Oh, Dear. . . Famously at GOP!)
 
If the GOP is working to repeal the health care bill, then why should it approve of anything in it?

DUH!
 
If the GOP is working to repeal the health care bill, then why should it approve of anything in it?

DUH!

It won't get repealed. Guarantee it.

Doesn't matter.

How stupid do you have to be to be outraged about the GOP not supporting a bill they are actively working against?

It really should come as a surprise to no one.

And I'm waiting for the result of the current lawsuits before I will agree with you.
 
If the GOP is working to repeal the health care bill, then why should it approve of anything in it?

DUH!

It won't get repealed. Guarantee it.

Doesn't matter.

How stupid do you have to be to be outraged about the GOP not supporting a bill they are actively working against?

It really should come as a surprise to no one.

And I'm waiting for the result of the current lawsuits before I will agree with you.

The lawsuits might work, but I guarantee the GOP will never have the balls to push for a full fledged repeal, regardless of what they might say today. Mark my word, after the elections "repeal" will morph into "work to fix what's wrong with it."
 
It won't get repealed. Guarantee it.

Doesn't matter.

How stupid do you have to be to be outraged about the GOP not supporting a bill they are actively working against?

It really should come as a surprise to no one.

And I'm waiting for the result of the current lawsuits before I will agree with you.

The lawsuits might work, but I guarantee the GOP will never have the balls to push for a full fledged repeal, regardless of what they might say today. Mark my word, after the elections "repeal" will morph into "work to fix what's wrong with it."

You're probably right. We all know repugnantcans are as gutless and slimy as any dimocrat. So we really should not expect much from either set of idiots.
 
It is not that we object to the concept of tax relief, we object to tax relief for the politically connected. In effect, new loopholes.

Tax relief should be general and universal. Tax relief for some lucky body means that everyone else pays more.

So what about a flat tax, or a national sales tax without income taxes?
 
The Republicans campaign for tax cuts, deficit reduction, a regulated market, zero tax relief for the low and middle incomes, as the usual and customary plan.

The National Health Plan comes along, essentially with tax cuts, deficit reduction, a regulated market, with mainly subsidies for lower and middle incomes--who have no federal income tax liabiliy. That was actually called, "Socialism!"

Lower and Middle Income, U. S. federal income tax filers, started coming off the U. S. federal income tax rolls with the 1986 Tax Reform. The Democrats raised and indexed the personal exemptions, and the standard deduction. The Clintons, now the famous mom and pop, provided an equal-amount-per-child tax credit. Bush II came along, as usual with no clue, and didn't bother to review the U. S. federal revenue picture.

They were so running government like a business!

Meg Whitman has now spent $120.0 mil. on her Gubernatorial Campaign in California: Apparently with not much revenue coming in.

So like dot-com-er, investor-bilking, stock-holder raiding, kind of business-people have the Republicans become: That actually a lot of their commentator friends do think that they are the party of business in America, at this time!

The Republicans, when it comes to the legislation that is right there before them: Then go ahead, in the usual and customary manner: And campaign against what they are for, and with donation money!

Anyone notices that, "No!" means "keep their business" open. If something they for comes along in legislation, then clearly they have to vote "No!"

Judges tend to call that, "bad faith!"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes Speak With Tongue Like Snake! Crawl in Walls. Not Eat For Many Moons. . . .eeeeewww. . . .Or at least get the Jews to do that)
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top