Google abortion-vote ad ban unprecedented, so why did they do it?

[barryqwalsh]

If you wanted further evidence of whom the Google move favours, look no further than the reaction of Yes campaigners and supporters, who wholeheartedly welcomed and applauded the decision.

The reasons for the decision, however, remain a mystery. Google declined to supply any rationale, or to answer a series of detailed questions from The Irish Times.



Google abortion-vote ad ban unprecedented, so why did they do it?

 

[Moonglow]

I really don't care one way or the other.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Is this important?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
for, in control of their own well being, yes especially coming from Ireland the vote is very important.

 

[ding]

Any people who cannot protect it's most defenseless and innocent members don't deserve liberty or freedom.

 

[Taz]

Google can do what it wants, just like when the Barilla pasta president came out against gay people, and his product tanked. You anti-choice peeps, like dingbat, are too wishy-washy to boycott Google to try to hurt their bottom line.

 

[BreezeWood]

.

Any people who cannot protect it's most defenseless and innocent members don't deserve liberty or freedom.

that has always been the 4th century christian motivation, to steal from people what is not theirs for the taking.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The ‘Republic’ of Ireland.

Referenda are not consistent with a republican form of government.

Such an important issue should be decided by elected representatives based on facts, evidence, and the law, not by plebiscite absent all three – the Brexit disaster clearly demonstrated the folly of referenda.