Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,164
- 1,830
When I was a kid I used to trick or treat for UNICEF then keep the money
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maajid Nawaz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaTo Tommy Tainant: You are twisted if you think anything the United Nations does is wonderful.To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.
And if punishing Karadzic is your objective, I guess this went over your head:
Military tribunals work quite well when there is a winner and a loser. When the crimes are internal and there is no winning foreign military available to conduct military tribunals the people should judge the accused.To Tommy Tainant: Maybe in your country but not in mine.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
Incidentally, can you support your opinion with an example?
I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
To Skull Pilot: You were wise beyond your years.When I was a kid I used to trick or treat for UNICEF then keep the money
To Tommy Tainant: Please. Not that one again. I covered that nonsense in several messages on other boards as well as here. Here are some of my opinions and observations:However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action.
But what do you tell the widows of the 20 million German civilians, that the leader of Czechoslovakia deported and killed in the SAME time as the Nuremburg trials were ongoing? I can't help but note that the same "justice" that the widow received with the verdict against Karadzic is in the same time a license for all future genocidal warlords. It had been the norm of history before the 20th century, that justice had a more scholarly meaning. The case you are describing is rather an evidence, that since the 20th century, justice is more only a sort of revenge. No wonder that only losers get it. Logically, that widow in the BBC exposee has just contributed to the start of the next genocide. Interestingly, among the nicknames of the various generations, the ww2 generation is called the "silent" generation. It would be nice to think that this is their name because they understand this problem.There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
It is unlikely that Blair and Bush will ever have to answer for their crimes.
However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action. The fact that some escape doesnt invalidate it.
The BBC interviewed a widow on the day he was sentenced. She lost her husband and both sons. She and her daughter were raped by karadzic thugs. She didnt see it as a fraud at all. .
Well you have lost me there. 20 million German civilians ?But what do you tell the widows of the 20 million German civilians, that the leader of Czechoslovakia deported and killed in the SAME time as the Nuremburg trials were ongoing? I can't help but note that the same "justice" that the widow received with the verdict against Karadzic is in the same time a license for all future genocidal warlords. It had been the norm of history before the 20th century, that justice had a more scholarly meaning. The case you are describing is rather an evidence, that since the 20th century, justice is more only a sort of revenge. No wonder that only losers get it. Logically, that widow in the BBC exposee has just contributed to the start of the next genocide. Interestingly, among the nicknames of the various generations, the ww2 generation is called the "silent" generation. It would be nice to think that this is their name because they understand this problem.There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?To see the Karadzic verdict as anything but wonderful is twisted.You can trace many of our current issues back to his genocide.
It is unlikely that Blair and Bush will ever have to answer for their crimes.
However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action. The fact that some escape doesnt invalidate it.
The BBC interviewed a widow on the day he was sentenced. She lost her husband and both sons. She and her daughter were raped by karadzic thugs. She didnt see it as a fraud at all. .
See? Exactly.Well you have lost me there. 20 million German civilians ?But what do you tell the widows of the 20 million German civilians, that the leader of Czechoslovakia deported and killed in the SAME time as the Nuremburg trials were ongoing? I can't help but note that the same "justice" that the widow received with the verdict against Karadzic is in the same time a license for all future genocidal warlords. It had been the norm of history before the 20th century, that justice had a more scholarly meaning. The case you are describing is rather an evidence, that since the 20th century, justice is more only a sort of revenge. No wonder that only losers get it. Logically, that widow in the BBC exposee has just contributed to the start of the next genocide. Interestingly, among the nicknames of the various generations, the ww2 generation is called the "silent" generation. It would be nice to think that this is their name because they understand this problem.There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.The problem with that is, that if we put away Karadzic, then why don't we put away those who cleansed away the German, the Hungarian, and the Italian? ... Oh because that is not history and never happened?
It is unlikely that Blair and Bush will ever have to answer for their crimes.
However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action. The fact that some escape doesnt invalidate it.
The BBC interviewed a widow on the day he was sentenced. She lost her husband and both sons. She and her daughter were raped by karadzic thugs. She didnt see it as a fraud at all. .
Oh lord.I just spent 10 minutes on this that I will never get back.See? Exactly.Well you have lost me there. 20 million German civilians ?But what do you tell the widows of the 20 million German civilians, that the leader of Czechoslovakia deported and killed in the SAME time as the Nuremburg trials were ongoing? I can't help but note that the same "justice" that the widow received with the verdict against Karadzic is in the same time a license for all future genocidal warlords. It had been the norm of history before the 20th century, that justice had a more scholarly meaning. The case you are describing is rather an evidence, that since the 20th century, justice is more only a sort of revenge. No wonder that only losers get it. Logically, that widow in the BBC exposee has just contributed to the start of the next genocide. Interestingly, among the nicknames of the various generations, the ww2 generation is called the "silent" generation. It would be nice to think that this is their name because they understand this problem.There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?I am not sure who you are referring to.
It is unlikely that Blair and Bush will ever have to answer for their crimes.
However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action. The fact that some escape doesnt invalidate it.
The BBC interviewed a widow on the day he was sentenced. She lost her husband and both sons. She and her daughter were raped by karadzic thugs. She didnt see it as a fraud at all. .
But let me give you a hint. Check out the Czech republic's count of German citizenry before 1946 and after 1946. Maybe you can check out the internationally supported Czechoslovakian leader Edward Bene. But I already know that you like most people will say that none of that matters, which is further proof to all my points above.
Murdered or deported ... For the purpose of this problem, it makes no difference. In the case of Czechoslovakia, it is deportation by the way, but that is only semantics. And like I predicted, you have now proven my point.Oh lord.I just spent 10 minutes on this that I will never get back.See? Exactly.Well you have lost me there. 20 million German civilians ?But what do you tell the widows of the 20 million German civilians, that the leader of Czechoslovakia deported and killed in the SAME time as the Nuremburg trials were ongoing? I can't help but note that the same "justice" that the widow received with the verdict against Karadzic is in the same time a license for all future genocidal warlords. It had been the norm of history before the 20th century, that justice had a more scholarly meaning. The case you are describing is rather an evidence, that since the 20th century, justice is more only a sort of revenge. No wonder that only losers get it. Logically, that widow in the BBC exposee has just contributed to the start of the next genocide. Interestingly, among the nicknames of the various generations, the ww2 generation is called the "silent" generation. It would be nice to think that this is their name because they understand this problem.There is an argument that you will only try the losers but that is not necessarily the case.What I am trying to say is that using "legal" processes to put away perpetrators of genocide is a fraud. This is because for every genocidal war lord you take to court, all the others in history that were not taken to court, will serve as a license to start new genocides in the future. The fraud of creating war crime courts was intentional, and this exact thing is their purpose. Isn't is just convenient?
It is unlikely that Blair and Bush will ever have to answer for their crimes.
However it is good to see these types face justice, just as Nuremburg was a symbolic action. The fact that some escape doesnt invalidate it.
The BBC interviewed a widow on the day he was sentenced. She lost her husband and both sons. She and her daughter were raped by karadzic thugs. She didnt see it as a fraud at all. .
But let me give you a hint. Check out the Czech republic's count of German citizenry before 1946 and after 1946. Maybe you can check out the internationally supported Czechoslovakian leader Edward Bene. But I already know that you like most people will say that none of that matters, which is further proof to all my points above.
President Benes had 20m Germans murdered after the war ?
I cant find any proof of this whatsoever.
I love being right when it shows where Socialism/Communism will go in this country:The Netherlands is the proving ground for worldwide Socialism’s Culture of Death. As I’ve said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in Holland.”