Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, each transcript is a few hundred pages long and there was something like 20 people that testified and some of them twice.Questioning of who?Do you have a source for this? The only thing I find is that a law resembling the one you reference to was working it’s way in December.There were a couple, the big one was members of parliament are no longer exempt form corruption statutes.
.
Yeah, it came out during the shitt show (ie the hoax inquiry). I don't remember which day. I believe it was during questioning by Gowdy.
.
Feel free to go read the transcripts, I watched almost all of the hearings and they're kind of blur of BS at this point.
.
So what you’re saying is that you want me to go back and read many thousands of pages to find the evidence of what you’re saying.
Okay...
You just got Proven that you are a LIAR, again.Why don't you ask them, Stumpy?Can they impeach me for asking The Moderators to crack down on your moral, ethical corruption and you constant trolling?Then why didn't Impeached Trump ask Zelensky to crack down on corruption?So being president is now illegal?....its up to the commander and chief to determine if our tax dollars we send to other nations will be used in a non corrupt fashion....OMB?...don't make us laugh...no one votes for the OMB....
Impeach your own damn self.
LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?Hey welsher, I thought you died.
The new Ukraine admin hadn't been certified for shit. Zelensky didn't take office till May and the new parliament didn't take office until Aug. Once the new parliament passed new anti-corruption laws and Zelensky signed them, the aid was released, well before the deadline. That's the facts, whether they fit your commie narrative or not.
.Hey shit for brains, DOD was given a list of anti-corruption reforms for Ukraine to put in place before the $391 M ($250 M & & $141 M) would be released. The funds were OKed by DOD, but the Orange One ordered OMB to hold them up for policy reasons which is NOT permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.The new Ukraine admin hadn't been certified for shit. Zelensky didn't take office till May and the new parliament didn't take office until Aug. Once the new parliament passed new anti-corruption laws and Zelensky signed them, the aid was released, well before the deadline. That's the facts, whether they fit your commie narrative or not.
Just today, GAO came out with a bulletin directly related to this cockup by POTUS Bone Spurs. GAO stated, "Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law."
And finally, you obviously haven't educated yourself about the contents of the Articles of Impeachment presented to the Senate for the trial to begin next Tuesday at 1 P.M. Take a look at Article 1 and you'll see the Narcissist-in-Chief is getting his tit in a ringer for that unlawful conduct;
(2) With the same corrupt motives, President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—conditioned two official acts on the public announcements that he had requested—
(A) the release of $391 million of United States taxpayer funds that Congress had appropriated on a bipartisan basis for the purpose of providing vital military and security assistance to Ukraine to oppose Russian aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended;
You really should know what the fuck you're talking about before you start to spew that far right horseshit and make yourself look so fucking stupid, Tex.
So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
Again, outted as the Pathological Liar and Troll that you are.You just got Proven that you are a LIAR, again.Why don't you ask them, Stumpy?Can they impeach me for asking The Moderators to crack down on your moral, ethical corruption and you constant trolling?Then why didn't Impeached Trump ask Zelensky to crack down on corruption?So being president is now illegal?....its up to the commander and chief to determine if our tax dollars we send to other nations will be used in a non corrupt fashion....OMB?...don't make us laugh...no one votes for the OMB....
Impeach your own damn self.
The GAO disagrees with you. Shake your cane at them.That's his job. Why aren't you impeaching him for holding up Foreign Aid to places like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
In fact, no where does it say in The Articles The President Violated Any Actual REAL LAW.
Can you show me what law was violated when he released the funds before the deadline?
Can you site US Code and point out where The Impeachment Inquiry was able to prove he violated that Portion of US Code?
No violations of US Code appear in The Articles, and that is why everyone is calling it Hoax Articles, or FAKE BOOBS.
They also have no Opinion Power. Their Opinion means as much as Faun's Comments.....less than nothing.The GAO disagrees with you. Shake your cane at them.That's his job. Why aren't you impeaching him for holding up Foreign Aid to places like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
In fact, no where does it say in The Articles The President Violated Any Actual REAL LAW.
Can you show me what law was violated when he released the funds before the deadline?
Can you site US Code and point out where The Impeachment Inquiry was able to prove he violated that Portion of US Code?
No violations of US Code appear in The Articles, and that is why everyone is calling it Hoax Articles, or FAKE BOOBS.
The GAO is an arm of congress and routinely sides with them. They have no enforcement power.
.
Why do you keep repeating this immaterial question?LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?Hey shit for brains, DOD was given a list of anti-corruption reforms for Ukraine to put in place before the $391 M ($250 M & & $141 M) would be released. The funds were OKed by DOD, but the Orange One ordered OMB to hold them up for policy reasons which is NOT permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.
Just today, GAO came out with a bulletin directly related to this cockup by POTUS Bone Spurs. GAO stated, "Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law."
And finally, you obviously haven't educated yourself about the contents of the Articles of Impeachment presented to the Senate for the trial to begin next Tuesday at 1 P.M. Take a look at Article 1 and you'll see the Narcissist-in-Chief is getting his tit in a ringer for that unlawful conduct;
You really should know what the fuck you're talking about before you start to spew that far right horseshit and make yourself look so fucking stupid, Tex.
So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
What you commies fail to understand is a delay because a new admin took power in Ukraine, doesn't equal a late delivery, it was delivered within the parameters of the law. If you think it wasn't, prove it.
.
So?The GAO disagrees with you. Shake your cane at them.That's his job. Why aren't you impeaching him for holding up Foreign Aid to places like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
In fact, no where does it say in The Articles The President Violated Any Actual REAL LAW.
Can you show me what law was violated when he released the funds before the deadline?
Can you site US Code and point out where The Impeachment Inquiry was able to prove he violated that Portion of US Code?
No violations of US Code appear in The Articles, and that is why everyone is calling it Hoax Articles, or FAKE BOOBS.
The GAO is an arm of congress and routinely sides with them. They have no enforcement power.
.
Why do you keep poisoning our planet by breathing?Why do you keep repeating this immaterial question?LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
What you commies fail to understand is a delay because a new admin took power in Ukraine, doesn't equal a late delivery, it was delivered within the parameters of the law. If you think it wasn't, prove it.
.
He did...Hunter had to quit his gig...or haven't you heard...Then why didn't Impeached Trump ask Zelensky to crack down on corruption?So being president is now illegal?....its up to the commander and chief to determine if our tax dollars we send to other nations will be used in a non corrupt fashion....OMB?...don't make us laugh...no one votes for the OMB....
Did the Ukraine get their money or not?...did they get it within the time line?...YES to both questions...Only if the law said he could.So being president is now illegal?....its up to the commander and chief to determine if our tax dollars we send to other nations will be used in a non corrupt fashion....OMB?...don't make us laugh...no one votes for the OMB....
Congress determines where the money is spent. If Congress said to sent Ukraine money, then he sends the money or goes back to congress.
We don't vote for the FBI, CIA either so we should ignore them too?
The law said the aid had to be released by Sep. 30th, it was done before that. So how did they violate the law?
.That's just like you and your Comrades. Single out a single snapshot from a three reel live action film and claim...The law said the aid had to be released by Sep. 30th, it was done before that. So how did they violate the law?
Disbursement of the $391M had been cleared and approved before the Orange Twit tried to halt the disbursement. The Orange Clown then got involved with his minions fucking with the funds in an unlawful manner with unlawful intent. That's one of the unlawful acts with more to follow after July, 2019, and that is made fully clear on reel #3 of the movie, but you don't care about TRUTH and FACTS and shit like that there kinda stuff owing to your kinship of character with the Narcissist-in-Chief! For the full story, a snapshot ain't gonna get 'er done Tex.
Hey welsher, I thought you died.
The new Ukraine admin hadn't been certified for shit. Zelensky didn't take office till May and the new parliament didn't take office until Aug. Once the new parliament passed new anti-corruption laws and Zelensky signed them, the aid was released, well before the deadline. That's the facts, whether they fit your commie narrative or not.
.
Hey shit for brains, DOD was given a list of anti-corruption reforms for Ukraine to put in place before the $391 M ($250 M & & $141 M) would be released. The funds were OKed by DOD, but the Orange One ordered OMB to hold them up for policy reasons which is NOT permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.The new Ukraine admin hadn't been certified for shit. Zelensky didn't take office till May and the new parliament didn't take office until Aug. Once the new parliament passed new anti-corruption laws and Zelensky signed them, the aid was released, well before the deadline. That's the facts, whether they fit your commie narrative or not.
Just today, GAO came out with a bulletin directly related to this cockup by POTUS Bone Spurs. GAO stated, "Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law."
And finally, you obviously haven't educated yourself about the contents of the Articles of Impeachment presented to the Senate for the trial to begin next Tuesday at 1 P.M. Take a look at Article 1 and you'll see the Narcissist-in-Chief is getting his tit in a ringer for that unlawful conduct;
(2) With the same corrupt motives, President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—conditioned two official acts on the public announcements that he had requested—
(A) the release of $391 million of United States taxpayer funds that Congress had appropriated on a bipartisan basis for the purpose of providing vital military and security assistance to Ukraine to oppose Russian aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended;
You really should know what the fuck you're talking about before you start to spew that far right horseshit and make yourself look so fucking stupid, Tex.
So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
Why do you keep repeating this immaterial question?
Did the Ukraine get their money or not?...did they get it within the time line?...YES to both questions...Only if the law said he could.So being president is now illegal?....its up to the commander and chief to determine if our tax dollars we send to other nations will be used in a non corrupt fashion....OMB?...don't make us laugh...no one votes for the OMB....
Congress determines where the money is spent. If Congress said to sent Ukraine money, then he sends the money or goes back to congress.
We don't vote for the FBI, CIA either so we should ignore them too?
They also have no Opinion Power. Their Opinion means as much as Faun's Comments.....less than nothing.The GAO disagrees with you. Shake your cane at them.That's his job. Why aren't you impeaching him for holding up Foreign Aid to places like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.LOLIf you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
In fact, no where does it say in The Articles The President Violated Any Actual REAL LAW.
Can you show me what law was violated when he released the funds before the deadline?
Can you site US Code and point out where The Impeachment Inquiry was able to prove he violated that Portion of US Code?
No violations of US Code appear in The Articles, and that is why everyone is calling it Hoax Articles, or FAKE BOOBS.
The GAO is an arm of congress and routinely sides with them. They have no enforcement power.
.
Why do you keep repeating this immaterial question?LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?So tell the class what date the aid was supposed to be released. Come on commie, show the class how smart you are, give us the EXACT DATE the law says the aid was to be released. Quote the LAW.
.
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
What you commies fail to understand is a delay because a new admin took power in Ukraine, doesn't equal a late delivery, it was delivered within the parameters of the law. If you think it wasn't, prove it.
.
It means your flame bait Troll thread, your opinion and the GAO's don't mean shit.So?The GAO disagrees with you. Shake your cane at them.That's his job. Why aren't you impeaching him for holding up Foreign Aid to places like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.LOLIf you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
In fact, no where does it say in The Articles The President Violated Any Actual REAL LAW.
Can you show me what law was violated when he released the funds before the deadline?
Can you site US Code and point out where The Impeachment Inquiry was able to prove he violated that Portion of US Code?
No violations of US Code appear in The Articles, and that is why everyone is calling it Hoax Articles, or FAKE BOOBS.
The GAO is an arm of congress and routinely sides with them. They have no enforcement power.
.
He avoids the answer because he is a paid Troll that is here to do one thing and that is to promote Negative Messaging, Lies, and Misinformation. Probably is a paid troll working for Putin or The DNC. Same thing either way.Why do you keep repeating this immaterial question?LOLWhy do you keep repeating this immaterial question?
If you can't say what date the aid was supposed to be released you can't claim it was delivered late. So tell us what date the law said it was to be released. Or you could just admit it wasn't late, because there was no date certain in the law and STFU.
.
His administration admitted he held the money up. You fluffers just can't seem to fluff enough.
What you commies fail to understand is a delay because a new admin took power in Ukraine, doesn't equal a late delivery, it was delivered within the parameters of the law. If you think it wasn't, prove it.
.
Why do you keep avoiding answering? Was the aid delivered within the parameters of the law or not? If you think not, prove it.
.
