Four More Years

[beretta304]

Only in America can a president who inherits a deep recession and whose policies have actually made the effects of that recession worse get re-elected. Only in America can a president who wants the bureaucrats who can't run the Post Office to micromanage the administration of every American's health care get re-elected.

Only in America can a president who kills Americans overseas who have never been charged or convicted of a crime get re-elected. And only in America can a president who borrowed and spent more than $5 trillion in fewer than four years, plans to repay none of it and promises to borrow another $5 trillion in his second term get re-elected.


What's going on here?

What is going on is the present-day proof of the truism observed by Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, who rarely agreed on anything in public: When the voters recognize that the public treasury has become a public trough, they will send to Washington not persons who will promote self-reliance and foster an atmosphere of prosperity, but rather those who will give away the most cash and thereby create dependency.

This is an attitude that, though present in some localities in the colonial era, was created at the federal level by Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt, magnified by FDR, enhanced by LBJ, and eventually joined in by all modern-day Democrats and most contemporary Republicans.


Four More Years by Andrew P. Napolitano

 

[Seawytch]

It isn't only in America that there are really sore losers though...

 

[beretta304]

It isn't only in America that there are really sore losers though...

I don't think anyone is a sore loser. Why? Not a thing has changed and to get anything done, Obama's route is still through the House.

 

[Katzndogz]

Four more years followed immediately by accepting the UN gun grab.

After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks | Reuters

You knew it was coming didn't you?

 

[zeke]

An official at the U.S. mission said Washington's objectives have not changed.

"We seek a treaty that contributes to international security by fighting illicit arms trafficking and proliferation, protects the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade, and meets the concerns that we have been articulating throughout," the official said.

"We will not accept any treaty that infringes on the constitutional rights of our citizens to bear arms," he said.

U.S. officials have acknowledged privately that the treaty under discussion would have no effect on domestic gun sales and ownership because it would apply only to exports.


Did you even read the link you provided? Sure sounds terrible, trying to reduce the number of guns around the world. Guns that terrorists like to use.

This is the kind of bullshit fear baiting that cost you assholes the recent election.

Do you remember Mitt? He lost. You backed him. You are a loser.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You people have to stop believing your own feel-good propaganda and try believing the truth,

and going from there.