koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,131
- 14,029
- 2,190
Where are all the libtards who said this was a terrible thing to do?
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?????
Bunch of libtard dumb asses.
Why do you think they would be outraged?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where are all the libtards who said this was a terrible thing to do?
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?????
Bunch of libtard dumb asses.
I'll be outraged when it's reported by someone other than Breitbart.
Nope. The fact that it made national news that day was good enough for me.Did you file a report!
Okay, but if the individual wasn't punished, then there isn't much of a victory....unless your goal was just to sully an organization instead of punishing the person responsible.
What "point" was that?Right...thanks for proving my point. Gotta head back to my SEIU job now. Thug training is at 3. Ciao!
That you cared more about smearing the organization than punishing the guilty individual.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rPWNY0oqEo]Union Members Force To Attend Rally For Warren Or Be Penalize - Warren Vs Brown - O'Reilly - YouTube[/ame]Any of the "major" news outlets will do. Shouldn't a whistleblower actually blow the whistle? Telling Breitbart is like putting foil on your head and running up and down the street.
Apparently the question was too hard. I asked you to name a 'reputable news' source. I would struggle with that too... but you seem to have a more flexible standard than I do.
Simple fact is... no major outlet would touch it... because they are beholden to unions. Most journalists are members of unions - most certainly on the left... they won't touch it.
Sucks to be rational but I prefer it to the alternative.
I did answer it. I was clear that I will be outraged when this is a confirmed story and not just some potential former employee with a grudge. When ABC, NBC, CNN or even FOX NEWS, not the Hannity's of the Right Wingosphere, pick it up. If it is a confirmed story and not something from a conspiracy site like Breitbart's, I'll stand beside you and demand an investigation.
I'll also remember this discussion the next time you're dismissing a report from Huffpo or Think Progress.
Well, don't you look foolish for making that assumption.That you cared more about smearing the organization than punishing the guilty individual.
Actually, I cared more about getting what I wanted in the first place. Being assaulted for asking for it came as a surprise. Unfortunately for them, it was on film.
And, in my book, their making the national news for it and looking like the thugs they were was punishment enough.
If it was NN, why not post a link?
What other assumption can one make when you chose not to press charges against an individual because it made an organization look bad.
It was one person, not the SEIU that attacked you.
Y'all don't like having all Tea Baggers painted as racist because some are, but you have no problem painting others with a broad brush?
I admit that my heart rate was quite elevated during it.We have something in common. I've been assaulted by an SEIU member during an election.
Ohhhh yea, I remember that! Man, that was funny..... for me at least. For you, maybe not so much.
Who knew they would react like that.
Freaky.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rPWNY0oqEo]Union Members Force To Attend Rally For Warren Or Be Penalize - Warren Vs Brown - O'Reilly - YouTube[/ame]Apparently the question was too hard. I asked you to name a 'reputable news' source. I would struggle with that too... but you seem to have a more flexible standard than I do.
Simple fact is... no major outlet would touch it... because they are beholden to unions. Most journalists are members of unions - most certainly on the left... they won't touch it.
Sucks to be rational but I prefer it to the alternative.
I did answer it. I was clear that I will be outraged when this is a confirmed story and not just some potential former employee with a grudge. When ABC, NBC, CNN or even FOX NEWS, not the Hannity's of the Right Wingosphere, pick it up. If it is a confirmed story and not something from a conspiracy site like Breitbart's, I'll stand beside you and demand an investigation.
I'll also remember this discussion the next time you're dismissing a report from Huffpo or Think Progress.
I await your outrage.
Well, don't you look foolish for making that assumption.
Actually, I cared more about getting what I wanted in the first place. Being assaulted for asking for it came as a surprise. Unfortunately for them, it was on film.
And, in my book, their making the national news for it and looking like the thugs they were was punishment enough.
If it was NN, why not post a link?
What other assumption can one make when you chose not to press charges against an individual because it made an organization look bad.
It was one person, not the SEIU that attacked you.
Y'all don't like having all Tea Baggers painted as racist because some are, but you have no problem painting others with a broad brush?
You use a pretty broad brush, and whine when it happens to you?
Dumb hag.
Irrelevant. One of your brethren is on tape confirming the topic.[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rPWNY0oqEo]Union Members Force To Attend Rally For Warren Or Be Penalize - Warren Vs Brown - O'Reilly - YouTube[/ame]I did answer it. I was clear that I will be outraged when this is a confirmed story and not just some potential former employee with a grudge. When ABC, NBC, CNN or even FOX NEWS, not the Hannity's of the Right Wingosphere, pick it up. If it is a confirmed story and not something from a conspiracy site like Breitbart's, I'll stand beside you and demand an investigation.
I'll also remember this discussion the next time you're dismissing a report from Huffpo or Think Progress.
I await your outrage.
That would be the right wingoshere. Bill O'Reilly isn't NEWS.
Nope. The fact that it made national news that day was good enough for me.
Okay, but if the individual wasn't punished, then there isn't much of a victory....unless your goal was just to sully an organization instead of punishing the person responsible.
A union thugs assaults someone, and the person assaulted was trying to sully the union?
You pathetic hag.
Liar.Okay, but if the individual wasn't punished, then there isn't much of a victory....unless your goal was just to sully an organization instead of punishing the person responsible.
A union thugs assaults someone, and the person assaulted was trying to sully the union?
You pathetic hag.
An INDIVIDUAL attacked another. The attacked did not wish to pursue charges against the attacker because their goal was to make SEIU look bad, not punish the guilty party. The SEIU was not the guilty party, the individual was you stinking shitbag.
Irrelevant. One of your brethren is on tape confirming the topic.
That would be the right wingoshere. Bill O'Reilly isn't NEWS.
All you have to do is click on the vid and see for yourself.
I now understand how denial can be so comfy for the emotionally weak.Irrelevant. One of your brethren is on tape confirming the topic.That would be the right wingoshere. Bill O'Reilly isn't NEWS.
All you have to do is click on the vid and see for yourself.
I saw no "brethren" of mine on that tape. That wasn't a public sector union. Public and private sector unions are two entirely different animals, but you knew that. This tape does not back up the assertion of the OP. It's not the same story.
Liar.A union thugs assaults someone, and the person assaulted was trying to sully the union?
You pathetic hag.
An INDIVIDUAL attacked another. The attacked did not wish to pursue charges against the attacker because their goal was to make SEIU look bad, not punish the guilty party. The SEIU was not the guilty party, the individual was you stinking shitbag.
My goal was NOT to make the attacker look bad. My goal was something else.
Two of your brethren attacked me - totally unexpected by me. However, a tape of it made national news. They made themselves look bad.
And, it's good to know that when a woman is attacked by two men that you call her the guilty party.
And, in the larger picture, as I said before: It's not hard to make the SEIU look bad because they are so willing to show themselves for what they are. You are just another case in point.
I now understand how denial can be so comfy for the emotionally weak.Irrelevant. One of your brethren is on tape confirming the topic.
All you have to do is click on the vid and see for yourself.
I saw no "brethren" of mine on that tape. That wasn't a public sector union. Public and private sector unions are two entirely different animals, but you knew that. This tape does not back up the assertion of the OP. It's not the same story.
I'm pragmatic. I was not in my home state and I did not want to have to stay where I was longer than I had to. My flight was the next day.Liar.An INDIVIDUAL attacked another. The attacked did not wish to pursue charges against the attacker because their goal was to make SEIU look bad, not punish the guilty party. The SEIU was not the guilty party, the individual was you stinking shitbag.
My goal was NOT to make the attacker look bad. My goal was something else.
Two of your brethren attacked me - totally unexpected by me. However, a tape of it made national news. They made themselves look bad.
And, it's good to know that when a woman is attacked by two men that you call her the guilty party.
And, in the larger picture, as I said before: It's not hard to make the SEIU look bad because they are so willing to show themselves for what they are. You are just another case in point.
And yet you chose not to press charges. Why?