'Force field' technology could make US tanks unstoppable

Discussion in 'Military' started by shockedcanadian, Aug 2, 2018.

  1. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    44,581
    Thanks Received:
    7,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +19,753
    If the round is destroyed BEFORE it hits the tank, then it is nothing like reactive armor. Period.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. night_son
    Offline

    night_son Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,247
    Thanks Received:
    881
    Trophy Points:
    355
    Location:
    The Full Moon
    Ratings:
    +3,934
    The closest thing we've had to this system is smoke. Vehicle launched smoke grenades in brigade formation make one hell of a screen but stop nothing. Reactive armor means a hit--and you don't want that when you're huddled down in the back, particularly with the old Halon systems that used to trip randomly. When you're buttoned up, that can be real bad. So can molten gas burning through to the inside from enemy man portable warheads.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2018
  3. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    57,527
    Thanks Received:
    12,397
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +43,061




    It will stop any incoming projectile (at least in theory). Sonic weapons are not affected.
     
  4. HereWeGoAgain
    Offline

    HereWeGoAgain Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    54,700
    Thanks Received:
    8,685
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
    Ratings:
    +41,260
    It reacts but at a distance rather than upon impact.
    So yeah it's a more advanced reactive armor.
     
  5. HereWeGoAgain
    Offline

    HereWeGoAgain Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    54,700
    Thanks Received:
    8,685
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
    Ratings:
    +41,260
    I'd say it's more like the Phalanx system than anything else.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Crepitus
    Online

    Crepitus Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    16,184
    Thanks Received:
    1,332
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,532
    Day late and a dollar short.

    the Chinese have already deployed their version.

     
  7. DrainBamage
    Offline

    DrainBamage Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Thanks Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +540
    Sigh. Here is a link to information on a single battle in Iraq where USA lost four tanks: Battle of Medina Ridge - Wikipedia

    "TF 1–37 suffered the loss of four M1A1 tanks destroyed and six personnel wounded in action"

    Do you know what the definition of "zero" is when you say no M-1 tanks were lost?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]



    Well this would be completely different than your previous statement about the next war, you've now backtracked into a completely different scenario of a war with certain countries as opposed the ones we've actually been having wars with. Bottom line = the actual conflicts we've been in over the past whatever decades have involved tanks, and not nukes.
     
  8. BuckToothMoron
    Offline

    BuckToothMoron Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,272
    Thanks Received:
    1,469
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,452
    Maybe, but I doubt it. If the first nuke dropped in war was dropped to end WW2, why hasn’t it been used since? There have been more tanks destroyed in combat since WW2 than nukes dropped.
     
  9. harmonica
    Online

    harmonica Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Messages:
    16,260
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    there has always been the ''battle'' between ''armor'' and anti-armor
    there will be someone/company/etc trying to over ride any ''unstoppable''' armor
    ..
     
  10. DrainBamage
    Offline

    DrainBamage Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Thanks Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +540
    I wonder how these types of systems do against the more advanced antitank weapons that do a swoop & dive?

    For example USA's Javelin doesn't fly like a TOW directly at the target but rather climbs to 150 meters then uses imaging infrared seeker to dive down from above and take advantage of the much weaker armor on the top part of tanks. I'm not sure the sensors on systems like this would pick up anything coming from above, and if even if they could would they be able to aim at it.
     

Share This Page