For the AGW Faithers

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Liability, Dec 5, 2009.

  1. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    If ANY Member of "the Faith" (i.e., the former scientists who now practice the Religion of AGW) were to even begin to TRY to make the old AGW argument, to do so in a scientific way, they would HAVE to rely on DATA. This raises some questions, wouldn't you say?

    Question:

    WHAT data would they now rely upon?

    Question:

    Why?

    Question:

    Is the data reliable?

    Question:

    How do you know the data is reliable?

    Question:

    What is the contrary data?

    Question:

    Do we have access to that contrary data?

    Question:

    If not, why not?

    Question:

    If we don't have access to ALL the data, can we perform "good science?"

    Question:

    In all honesty, as a scientist, wouldn't you agree that without good, reliable and complete data being shared and disseminated freely in an unaltered form, no valid scientific conclusions can be reached?




    Of course, it is a clear possibility that I MIGHT be leaving a "few" questions out....


    (Disclaimer: This post of mine is lifted from another thread. I thought it might serve as a springboard in its own thread.)
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2009
  2. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    It's still a bit early I guess to expect the AGW scientists [sic] to offer some brilliant answers to the questions...
     
  3. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    The silence on this is deafening. Liability? Good Thread.

    Dude? Good Form! :lol:
     
  5. Meister
    Offline

    Meister VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    25,900
    Thanks Received:
    8,099
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Conservative part of the Northwest
    Ratings:
    +8,100
    < Chirp >
     
  6. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    These thoughts just occured to me, and I figured as long as the AGW FAITHERS are avoiding the questions in the OP, I might as well use this thread to pose these semi-related questions:

    1. Should the religion of the AGW Faithers be covered by the First Amendment?

    2. Is it already covered by the 1st Amendment?

    3. Is algore the high holy man?
     
  7. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    Speaking of Pope algore, I think I have discovered some evidence of the miracles:

    He is more wooden than Pinnichio, can't sing, can't act, can't dance, can't deliver a joke to save his ass yet he won an Oscar!

    He has not a fucking clue about actual science, yet won a Nobel Prize for his "work" in Global Warming....

    And can garner more popular votes in a general election than George W. Bush, yet NOT win the Presidential Election!

    We are talkin' some SERIOUS miracles here!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. garyd
    Offline

    garyd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,943
    Thanks Received:
    401
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Ratings:
    +401
    Or serious incompetence, or just abysmal knavery.

    The first clue that something smelled highy of fish came back in the nineties when they insisted that the satellite intruments needed to be calibrated - get this - because the data didn't match their models. Around the same time or perhaps a bit earlier these clowns submitted thier work but refused to submit the raw data upon which it was based. This is the science version of faith healing
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    Ahl bin-Gore?
     
  10. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,385
    Thanks Received:
    19,849
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,420
    ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    time for a pity post


    That was super interesting Liability...thanks for posting
     

Share This Page