flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Oh, here's a graph of GISS minus RSS.
RSS reads hotter than GISS during El Nino years, with GISS hotter in La Nina years.
Why? They're measuring two different things. GISS is surface, satellites are mid-troposphere. GISS goes all the way to the poles. UAH doesn't go past 85 North or South, while RSS has even less coverage.
More La Ninas recently means GISS is looking higher recently. No need to invoke conspiracies.
Ronan Connolly's other papers explain why the Greenhouse Effect doesn't exist, and are complete nonsense. Hence I can't take anything he says seriously. That latest paper looks like a long Gish Gallup.
So lemme get this straight -- last night you were defending a zombie study that USED satellite data to fill in the surface temperature record at the poles. And today you're bitching about no coverage above 85deg.. Guess what Bullwinkle -- the SURFACE records largely stop at 85 degs also !!!!
Not to mention you lied about what portions of the atmos can and ARE measured by satellite method.. That record covers 96% of the globe's surface RELIABLY, UNIFORMLY and EVENLY SAMPLED... That's why it's the Record of record..