FBI is wrapping up e-mail investigation with no evidence Clinton willfully violated the law

[Papageorgio]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

That's not what guciffer says.

How cute. You believe a felon and con man.

Just like a Trump supporter would.

Trump and Clinton, the two worst candidates ever. To say Clinton, the liar, the war monger, the inept is better than Trump, is saying nothing positive about Clinton, but that is all we have, nothing positive about either candidate, so we have to try to prop one candidate is better than the other.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Total nonsense. There is no confirmation that the server was hacked.

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Total nonsense. There is no confirmation that the server was hacked.

What confirmation are you looking for? You think stakeholders are going to rush to say that the server was hacked

You know nothing about Cybersecurity. You keep exposing yourself. Worse, you can't validate.

I don't have to know anything about cyber security. I can read and comprehend.

You must know that there are sophisticated hacking programs that imitate a common user and leave no unique footprint. It simply looks like someone allowed had used the system.

Comprehend this. I am in the Cybersecurity industry. The sophisticated hacking programs you refer to are polymorphic attacks architected at the lowest level in the stack to evade even the most defense in depth security infrastructures. Malware is being designed on the fly to go undetected to capture and disseminate information to the hackers. The State Department is not unlike organizations that have a sophisticated security infrastructure yet still could be vulnerable to unknown targeted malware. What was the Security Infrastructure like in the closet?

That said, just because you read what you want does not mean nothing was hacked.

Sent via email, correct?
Email must be opened, correct?
Shutting down the server to remove them would be prudent, correct?
If the malware never enters the server than there is no back door for a hacker to enter, correct?

You made no point at all cyberman.

Regardless of your background, you make no sense whatsoever. When was the server shut down? Provide a timeline. From there, understand the concept of "zero day" and the "dwell time factor" when it comes to malware. HINT: for your retort to have any ounce of credibility, the server would have never been set up in the first place.

When the FBI clears Hillary, the Trumpites will yell FOWL. Maybe Donnie will be indicted for fraudulent business practices in the Dump University scandal by then. The first day in court is also the first day of the GOP convention. Donnie will be in Cleveland being fitted for his crown.

I think she will be cleared. Americans just need to ask themselves if they want a president that will put her interests above US regardless of the costs.

 

[Arizona Willie]

To most Democrats, especially in the MSM, Bill Clinton is a 'loveable ole pervert.' But the reality is actually much darker. He's sexually abused young women for many years. He's a devious sex predator like Bill Cosby. And his wife is an accomplice. She's defended him and viciously attacked his numerous victims. They're both very bad people who should be in jail.

Since the 1990's conservative oligarchs have been paying people to come up with salacious stories about the Clintons, without any evidence that any of these things happened. It's pretty clear that Clinton is a serial adulterer, but the stories of his so-called sexual assaults come across as really ham-handed attempts at seduction. And when told "No", he stopped.

The one and only woman who has accused Clinton of rape, has also publicly stated that it never happened. Which is the lie and which is the truth? None of the other women filed suit, laid charges, or filed a complaint at the time.

Monica Lewinsky told friends she was "packing her knee pads" and moving to Washington. Clinton didn't "prey upon a young intern". She was young and foolish, but she was nobody's victim.

========
You didn't get the quote of Monica quite right. She said she was " packing my Presidential knee pads ".
She firmly intended to seduce Clinton if she got the chance. An innocent little girl she was not.

Clinton like Bill Cosby, has a long history of abusing women. He's not the 'Victim.' Shame on all you Clinton Bootlickers for blaming the real victims. You're very bad folks.

========
Monica was **no** victim. Other women --- perhaps. But Monica was not victimized at all. She was a perfectly willing participant and intended to seduce Clinton before she ever left home.

 

[easyt65]

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Because he feared it might be being hacked...there is no evidence it was, unlike the State Dept system, dupe.

WRONG. The IG specifically stated a hacker WAS IN HER SERVER when he shut it down, TWICE. And they were STILL REQUIRED BY LAW to report it, even if the hacker had not gotten all the way in. Again, they did not do so - they BROKE THE LAW.

Link to the IG stating that.
There were suspicious emails with attachments that weren't opened. The system was shut down to remove them. Far from hacked.

As I mentionex earlier, the link has already been posted - look it up / look for it.

 

[paulitician]

To most Democrats, especially in the MSM, Bill Clinton is a 'loveable ole pervert.' But the reality is actually much darker. He's sexually abused young women for many years. He's a devious sex predator like Bill Cosby. And his wife is an accomplice. She's defended him and viciously attacked his numerous victims. They're both very bad people who should be in jail.

Since the 1990's conservative oligarchs have been paying people to come up with salacious stories about the Clintons, without any evidence that any of these things happened. It's pretty clear that Clinton is a serial adulterer, but the stories of his so-called sexual assaults come across as really ham-handed attempts at seduction. And when told "No", he stopped.

The one and only woman who has accused Clinton of rape, has also publicly stated that it never happened. Which is the lie and which is the truth? None of the other women filed suit, laid charges, or filed a complaint at the time.

Monica Lewinsky told friends she was "packing her knee pads" and moving to Washington. Clinton didn't "prey upon a young intern". She was young and foolish, but she was nobody's victim.

========
You didn't get the quote of Monica quite right. She said she was " packing my Presidential knee pads ".
She firmly intended to seduce Clinton if she got the chance. An innocent little girl she was not.

Clinton like Bill Cosby, has a long history of abusing women. He's not the 'Victim.' Shame on all you Clinton Bootlickers for blaming the real victims. You're very bad folks.

========
Monica was **no** victim. Other women --- perhaps. But Monica was not victimized at all. She was a perfectly willing participant and intended to seduce Clinton before she ever left home.

Blaming the victim, is truly shameful. Can you Clinton Bootlickers stoop any lower? Doesn't look like it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Total nonsense. There is no confirmation that the server was hacked.

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Total nonsense. There is no confirmation that the server was hacked.

What confirmation are you looking for? You think stakeholders are going to rush to say that the server was hacked

I don't have to know anything about cyber security. I can read and comprehend.

You must know that there are sophisticated hacking programs that imitate a common user and leave no unique footprint. It simply looks like someone allowed had used the system.

Comprehend this. I am in the Cybersecurity industry. The sophisticated hacking programs you refer to are polymorphic attacks architected at the lowest level in the stack to evade even the most defense in depth security infrastructures. Malware is being designed on the fly to go undetected to capture and disseminate information to the hackers. The State Department is not unlike organizations that have a sophisticated security infrastructure yet still could be vulnerable to unknown targeted malware. What was the Security Infrastructure like in the closet?

That said, just because you read what you want does not mean nothing was hacked.

Sent via email, correct?
Email must be opened, correct?
Shutting down the server to remove them would be prudent, correct?
If the malware never enters the server than there is no back door for a hacker to enter, correct?

You made no point at all cyberman.

Regardless of your background, you make no sense whatsoever. When was the server shut down? Provide a timeline. From there, understand the concept of "zero day" and the "dwell time factor" when it comes to malware. HINT: for your retort to have any ounce of credibility, the server would have never been set up in the first place.

When the FBI clears Hillary, the Trumpites will yell FOWL. Maybe Donnie will be indicted for fraudulent business practices in the Dump University scandal by then. The first day in court is also the first day of the GOP convention. Donnie will be in Cleveland being fitted for his crown.

I think she will be cleared. Americans just need to ask themselves if they want a president that will put her interests above US regardless of the costs.

Confirmation from the investigative authority of course.
No alleged hacker whether a nation or an individual has provided confirmation of a hack. Not one document has been leaked.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

WRONG!

One could argue that she did willfully engage in 'espionage' because, as the State Department IG pointed out, her IT tech had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked. BY LAW she was required to report it - she didn't. By not doing so she broke the law.

Also, by doing so, at the least, she is guilty of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act, which does NOT require a 'willful' act!

Any way you cut, numerous times in numerous ways, this butch is GUILTY.

Because he feared it might be being hacked...there is no evidence it was, unlike the State Dept system, dupe.

WRONG. The IG specifically stated a hacker WAS IN HER SERVER when he shut it down, TWICE. And they were STILL REQUIRED BY LAW to report it, even if the hacker had not gotten all the way in. Again, they did not do so - they BROKE THE LAW.

Link to the IG stating that.
There were suspicious emails with attachments that weren't opened. The system was shut down to remove them. Far from hacked.

As I mentionex earlier, the link has already been posted - look it up / look for it.

Except you didn't. The IG never stated there was a hacker in her system. If you have that you should post that.

 

[JimH52]

To most Democrats, especially in the MSM, Bill Clinton is a 'loveable ole pervert.' But the reality is actually much darker. He's sexually abused young women for many years. He's a devious sex predator like Bill Cosby. And his wife is an accomplice. She's defended him and viciously attacked his numerous victims. They're both very bad people who should be in jail.

Since the 1990's conservative oligarchs have been paying people to come up with salacious stories about the Clintons, without any evidence that any of these things happened. It's pretty clear that Clinton is a serial adulterer, but the stories of his so-called sexual assaults come across as really ham-handed attempts at seduction. And when told "No", he stopped.

The one and only woman who has accused Clinton of rape, has also publicly stated that it never happened. Which is the lie and which is the truth? None of the other women filed suit, laid charges, or filed a complaint at the time.

Monica Lewinsky told friends she was "packing her knee pads" and moving to Washington. Clinton didn't "prey upon a young intern". She was young and foolish, but she was nobody's victim.

========
You didn't get the quote of Monica quite right. She said she was " packing my Presidential knee pads ".
She firmly intended to seduce Clinton if she got the chance. An innocent little girl she was not.

Clinton like Bill Cosby, has a long history of abusing women. He's not the 'Victim.' Shame on all you Clinton Bootlickers for blaming the real victims. You're very bad folks.

And Donnie is as pure as snow! Right?

By the way, Bill is not running for President.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

As a public service, let it be noted again that there were indeed RULES which Shrillary (as Secretary of State) should have complied with regarding the use of private servers for her official business.

There WERE also 9and there STILL ARE) LAWS which make her stupid careless behavior arguably criminal.

Don't misunderstand. Nobody expects our feckless Department of Justice to actually DO anything about her probable criminal acts.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

An additional update for the benefit of dimwits like JimmyAYCH52: This thread is not about Donald "the" Trump.

 

[JimH52]

An additional update for the benefit of dimwits like JimmyAYCH52: This thread is not about Donald "the" Trump.

You are showing your desperation. Donnie is a loose canon that will melt in a real debate.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

An additional update for the benefit of dimwits like JimmyAYCH52: This thread is not about Donald "the" Trump.

You are showing your desperation. Donnie is a loose canon that will melt in a real debate.

No. YOU have been deflecting. I'm not at all desperate. I loathe Shrillary and I don't much care for Trump.

The Dims are the ones concerned, which explains your own desperate efforts to offer meaningless posts full of deflection. They are afraid that Shrillary might not get anointed after all. Too funny.

 

[Meathead]

An additional update for the benefit of dimwits like JimmyAYCH52: This thread is not about Donald "the" Trump.

You are showing your desperation. Donnie is a loose canon that will melt in a real debate.

Seems like we heard that 6 months ago. All he does is keep winning. Weird, huh?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

As a public service, let it be noted again that there were indeed RULES which Shrillary (as Secretary of State) should have complied with regarding the use of private servers for her official business.

There WERE also 9and there STILL ARE) LAWS which make her stupid careless behavior arguably criminal.

Don't misunderstand. Nobody expects our feckless Department of Justice to actually DO anything about her probable criminal acts.

Nice set up of the inevitable conspiracy that will proliferate once no charges are announced.

 

[leftwinger]

You know nothing about Cybersecurity. You keep exposing yourself. Worse, you can't validate.

You go with the Rumanian HS grad.felon/con man/prisoner, I'll go with real news media and the US justice system.

You cannot define real news media....., or, you are afraid.

Any modern world news media not bankrolled by a-hole GOP billionaires. IE Fox, Examiner, Rush, Beck, Levin, Breitbart, Heritage, etc etc. Duh.

You go with CBS ... Proven forgery.

Set up. Everything on the forgery was true. Meanwhile, RW propaganda is total bs, for dupes only.

You know nothing about Cybersecurity. You keep exposing yourself. Worse, you can't validate.

You go with the Rumanian HS grad.felon/con man/prisoner, I'll go with real news media and the US justice system.

You cannot define real news media....., or, you are afraid.

Any modern world news media not bankrolled by a-hole GOP billionaires. IE Fox, Examiner, Rush, Beck, Levin, Breitbart, Heritage, etc etc. Duh.

You go with CBS ... Proven forgery.

Set up. Everything on the forgery was true. Meanwhile, RW propaganda is total bs, for dupes only.

"Everything on the fogery was true" WTH? A paid "journalist" firges a doc and some think that is OK? Maybe in NK, Cuba etc. But not here. It bad enough our state ran media hides the real truth from the normal voters. Land O' Goshen!

 

[IlarMeilyr]

As a public service, let it be noted again that there were indeed RULES which Shrillary (as Secretary of State) should have complied with regarding the use of private servers for her official business.

There WERE also 9and there STILL ARE) LAWS which make her stupid careless behavior arguably criminal.

Don't misunderstand. Nobody expects our feckless Department of Justice to actually DO anything about her probable criminal acts.

Nice set up of the inevitable conspiracy that will proliferate once no charges are announced.

Nice subtle admission that the game is rigged and that although well deserved, charges will not be filed.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

As a public service, let it be noted again that there were indeed RULES which Shrillary (as Secretary of State) should have complied with regarding the use of private servers for her official business.

There WERE also 9and there STILL ARE) LAWS which make her stupid careless behavior arguably criminal.

Don't misunderstand. Nobody expects our feckless Department of Justice to actually DO anything about her probable criminal acts.

Nice set up of the inevitable conspiracy that will proliferate once no charges are announced.

Nice subtle admission that the game is rigged and that although well deserved, charges will not be filed.

There is no admission subtle or otherwise. Your admission with the cinspiracy is that you are indeed not mature enough to handle the subject.
Funny that you all are certain that crimes had been committed but will not accept the reports that will be given. Those investigating this have seen all of the information while you have not.

 

[Bassman007]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

If you violated the law and did so by accident, you have still violated the law. This is a common topic of conversation at the maximum security prison cell block PTA meeting

 

[IlarMeilyr]

As a public service, let it be noted again that there were indeed RULES which Shrillary (as Secretary of State) should have complied with regarding the use of private servers for her official business.

There WERE also 9and there STILL ARE) LAWS which make her stupid careless behavior arguably criminal.

Don't misunderstand. Nobody expects our feckless Department of Justice to actually DO anything about her probable criminal acts.

Nice set up of the inevitable conspiracy that will proliferate once no charges are announced.

Nice subtle admission that the game is rigged and that although well deserved, charges will not be filed.

There is no admission subtle or otherwise. Your admission with the cinspiracy is that you are indeed not mature enough to handle the subject.
Funny that you all are certain that crimes had been committed but will not accept the reports that will be given. Those investigating this have seen all of the information while you have not.

I realize that I am dealing with a completely dishonest nitwit juvenile mutant when I try to speak with the likes of you. It's understood. But, maybe, with patience, someday you can begin to be mature and honest.

You also write coherent English sentences like my ass farts French.

Neverthelss, the fact that you choose to deny reality doesn't change anything.

It is clear that on the FACE of her behavior, Shrillary Rotten Clinton probably violated the law. It is also clear that a joke of a DoJ like the Obumbler Administration's "Justice" Department is highly unlikely to DO a damn thing about it. (He endorsed Shrillary, don't ya know. And his POLITICAL appointee, the incumbent AG, is the one who would have to bust a move to do something about what Shrillary did in a criminal law context, so even a trout like you SHOULD be able to figure out that the lodging of charges is unlikely.)

I know. An entirely partisan bullshit flinging monkey like you will always resort to the canard that "it's a conspiracy theory" as though that has any validity to it. But it doesn't. What DOES have validity is comparing what she did (and even assuming she was only careless, negligent and reckless) against the specifics of the law. But that leads to the conclusion that she probably ought to be charged. So being a dutifully and overly partisan snot rag, such as you are, you will refrain from anything remotely valid.