bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
How could an article about Mueller recanting what he said at his press conference not be about his press conference?
The headline is about Mueller recanting. The article simply drones on about Mueller's press conference and claims that he contradicted himself somewhere along the way...yet offers nothing to substantiate that claim. In fact, the closest the article comes is to claim that the press conference was inconsistent with what Barr claims Mueller said some time ago.
So your article doesn't even claim Mueller recanted his statements at his press conference. It would seem to imply that the press conference itself is the recantation of previous comments that were allegedly said in private. If you had a reading comprehension level above 1st grade you would already understand this.
Mueller and Barr team up to blast misinterpretations: 'No conflict' on obstruction
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination — one way or the other — about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements," a joint statement from DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said.