TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #41
It's constitutional until the court revisits it and says otherwise. Not when you say otherwiseLol. What im saying is, those activists opinions are merely opinions to me. It is technically law but that doesnt mea it is unconstitutionalThank you for admitting to everyone that you are so delusional that you think by not paying attention to the Supreme Court....you render their decisions something other than established law.I have told you many of times, i dont care what the SC says. They have been wrong many of times.That's the best that you can do? You aren't very impressive.Its the same angle, you just arent very bright.You try anything wont you . Having been shot down on the regulatory bullshit, you now pivot to a new angle . However, you are wrong again. The 1964 Civil rights act affords protections to various groups against discrimination BY ANYONE public or private and has been upheld as constitutional.
'Is it constitutional, the Civil Rights Act?'
Therefor, if people are protected based on race, gender, religion etc. LGBT people and any other identifiable group must also be protected
Maybe the difference between you and i is that i can read basic english. And i dont let other people guide my way.
Try being an individual some day. Its great.