Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Hillary is frantically trying to blame her election loss on everyone from James Comey to Vladimir Putin to anonymous hackers. Lately, when people continue to not believe her, she switched her accusations to the very media that has supported her and covered up for her for so long.
Anybody except herself.
But the guy who turned the emails over to WikiLeaks, says he got them from one of Hillary's own: A disgusted Democrat campaign official who had legal access to them. He was tired of Hillary's abuse, her rigging of the primaries against Bernie Sanders, etc. The Russians had nothing to do with it.
Unsurprisingly, the media is saying little about these reports, and is making no effort to contact the guy although his name and office has been clearly broadcast.
Have they yet found any proof that the Russians had anything to do with it?
----------------------------------------------------------
WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online
Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
Published: 15:33 EST, 14 December 2016 | Updated: 18:01 EST, 14 December 2016
A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September
Murray is a controversial figure who was removed from his post as a British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct. He was cleared of those but left the diplomatic service in acrimony.
His links to Wikileaks are well known and while his account is likely to be seen as both unprovable and possibly biased, it is also the first intervention by Wikileaks since reports surfaced last week that the CIA believed Russia hacked the Clinton emails to help hand the election to Donald Trump.
Anybody except herself.
But the guy who turned the emails over to WikiLeaks, says he got them from one of Hillary's own: A disgusted Democrat campaign official who had legal access to them. He was tired of Hillary's abuse, her rigging of the primaries against Bernie Sanders, etc. The Russians had nothing to do with it.
Unsurprisingly, the media is saying little about these reports, and is making no effort to contact the guy although his name and office has been clearly broadcast.
Have they yet found any proof that the Russians had anything to do with it?
----------------------------------------------------------
WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online
Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
- Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
- He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
- The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
- Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
- 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
- Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to Wikileaks
Published: 15:33 EST, 14 December 2016 | Updated: 18:01 EST, 14 December 2016
A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September
Murray is a controversial figure who was removed from his post as a British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct. He was cleared of those but left the diplomatic service in acrimony.
His links to Wikileaks are well known and while his account is likely to be seen as both unprovable and possibly biased, it is also the first intervention by Wikileaks since reports surfaced last week that the CIA believed Russia hacked the Clinton emails to help hand the election to Donald Trump.
