Tea party candidates are the only evidence this election cycle is offering better people than the ones who brought this country to its present state. Unfortunately, Tea Partiers are too few and not every one of the few will win. Heres the latest offering from the Republican party. Big headline on this mornings Drudge Report says: ROMNEY NARROWS VP CHOICES; CONDI EMERGES AS FRONTRUNNER Romney cant be serious about picking Rice Cakes! I have to believe he is only drumming up a little media coverage for his campaign. If Im wrong about his little ploy, hes lost me AGAIN! Allow me to clarify. Way back before the first primary, I said I would never vote for a Northeast liberal investment banker from Massachusetts; especially one who was in the late Ted Kennedys back pocket on Romney/Kennedycare. I said I would either stay home on election day, or vote for congressional candidates only. Time marched on and I recently softened my objection to Romney based entirely on his promise to help repeal Hillarycare II. I dont trust Romney on anything else, I barely trust him on repeal, but there is a chance a slight chance repeal legislation will make it to his desk and he will sign it. Repeal is not possible if it has to override a presidential veto; hence, Hussein has to go. I say slight chance because Democrats always stop Republican legislation until they get bipartisanship meaning RINO give them everything they want. Democrats would have stopped the Affordable Care Act had they opposed it, while Republicans could not stop it because Democrats wanted it and got it without bipartisanship. Its like there are two sets of rules in Congress. Thats why I have doubts about repeal coming to fruition. Still, gambling on Romney is the only bet on the table. The fear is that he will sign repeal while doing so much damage everywhere else he erases the only thing he is good for. Incidentally, Bush the Younger let Ted Kennedy write an education bill. Romney told the NAACP that he would give federal money to families so they could send their kids to better schools. I dont suppose it ever occurred to either of those two sterling Republicans that the federal government has no business in education on any level. On to Rice Rice Cakes is one of the two worst choices Bush the Younger picked for his cabinet. Colin Powell was the other. Rice Cakes is of the parasite class. She bounces back and forth between government jobs and the academy. Rice Cakes was mentored by Madeleine Albrights father who was a European parasite that came to this country and ended up feeding at the public trough in the University of Denver. Rice Cakes also served in Bush the Elders White House. She never gave either Bush advice that was good for Americas sovereignty. Heres an example of Rice neither Romney nor the media want the public to see: Kyoto: still signed Robert Novak Jul 22, 2002 Kyoto: still signed - Robert Novak - [page] Rices influence in not unsigning Kyoto is only one of the reasons she qualifies as Bushs worst cabinet officer. I recall the days when Rice Cakes couldnt put a sentence together without including the phrases International community or United Nations or Security Council resolution. I doubt if she has abandoned her love for the UNIC (United Nations/International Community); a love that was probably nurtured by Madeleine Albrights father. If Rice is anything she is a leader in the female wing of the New World Order party. The political beliefs of Albright, Rice, and Hillary Clinton cant be separated with a laser beam. The problem with those characters is compounded by the way the media puffs them up with untrue crap about their wonderful personalities. Hillary Clinton is as foul a human being as you can find, but if you rely on media images she is the Virgin Mary, Florence Nightingale, and Mother Teresa rolled into one. Instead of false advertising this time around, I would like to know where Rice stands on Kyoto now that environmental frauds perpetrated by the United Nations are common knowledge. In short: Where does she stand on all of the important issues media mouths never ask about. Ditto all of the wannabes Romney is looking at for the number two slot. In fact, it would be nice knowing where Romney stands. The most important unasked question of all is this: Is Americas independence your first loyalty? There is no doubt how Tea Partiers would answer. No so with candidates from the two major political parties. Every one of them will say they love this country, but not one of them will give a straight answer to the question because the record shows that Americas sovereignty has been eroded by Democrats and Republicans alike who sought and attained high office. On top of everything else Mark Levin points out: And this: Posted on July 12, 2012 Mark Levin Says No To Condi Rice As VP: "Pick A Damn Conservative" Mark Levin Says No To Condi Rice As VP: "Pick A Damn Conservative" | RealClearPolitics Not only Sununu and Souter. You cant surf into FOX without seeing Karl Rove talking like he is still fooling everyone. Maybe Romney should pick Jeb Bush for VP. What the hell, if establishment Republicans are reheating Bush leftovers it might as well be Jeb. Should he ascend to the presidency he cant be worse than Joe Biden taking over for Hussein? Finally, Hussein is so bad Romney should be ahead by 20 points. Hes barely even. Should he pick Rice Cakes, Rubio, or Jindal hell be lucky if hes is not behind by 20 points on election day. Those three come with a lot of grief for a guy who needs every vote he can get. Somebody in Romneys camp should tell him he better work at hanging onto the voters hes got instead of getting cute courting voters he has no chance of getting.