Toro
Diamond Member
yup that is a much better graphic
more honest
What's more honest by taking a mere 20 years worth of data?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yup that is a much better graphic
more honest
Kids... Toro here is probably some series 7 clown workin' the desk at some low rent equity house. And this should be a lesson to ALL of you who have ever even THOUGHT about walking through the door of such a den of theives...
This is the level of 'expertise' you're going to find workin' the desk...
That chart is pretty much worthless. Here's a better chart:
I can understand why some people who don't like Obama or the Democrats would try to explain it away, but if you are going to bang on Obama for the market, you better be careful because odds are that you will look silly.
Your chart tells you little because it only tells you the past 20 years. Why limit yourself to a mere generation? That's about the duration of the average bull market.
Here is the performance of the market from 1901 to 2006 based on political composition of the government. Generally, the market has done worse under Republicans than under Democrats.
The Big Picture
I think they are saying that who has controlled Congress should be taken into account as well as which party controlled the white house.
I think they are saying that who has controlled Congress should be taken into account as well as which party controlled the white house.
Sure. Which is why I posted the table above.
But people are taking a highly improbable bet banging on the current President and are likely to be proven wrong 3.5 years from now.
ROFLMNAO...
Isn't it cute?
the Economy muddles along, DESPITE the punishing, anti-Capitalist policies of this Marxist regime and Chris here wants to Celebrate a 120pt. gain in the equity markets; and this after the LAST round of Socialist Policies caused the Real Estate Market to CRASH, which resulted in that same market tumbling down FIVE THOUSAND POINTS...
OK Chris... Let's celebrate!
WOO HOO KIDS! The Market is gaining DESPITE ANTI-MARKET POLICIES which PUNISH PRODUCTIVITY, PRIVATE OWNERSHIP and the Unalienable rights of the individual to pursue the fullfilment of one's life through the unfettered use of the product of one's LABOR!
YEEeeeeeeeeeeee HAAAwww.... Go MARKET!
We now return you to the regularly scheduled reality...
The market will significantly outperform under Obama than it did under Bush.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/64052-stock-market-performance-by-president.html
ROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now understand kids... What she wants to point out here are a couple of misnomers...
First, she wants to point to the "President".... as if the president sets fiscal policy... The President SIGNS fiscal policy and executes the policy PASSED AND IMPLEMENTED BY THE LEGISLATURE...
Second she wants to look at gains...
We should HOPE the market does well... and as one who is ass deep in equities, I'm in that camp; but the Market is due for some gains given it's LOSSES since the LEFTISTS GAINED POWER.
And while it's a delightful little graph which hopes to show how the markets reacts to Republican -v- Democrat Presidents... It should be noted that the Market did its best (according to Toro's little graph, during the period when CONSERVATIVES were passing and implementing FISCAL POLICY! It's the lovely, but tallest 'white' box... labeled "Clinton."
Now lets look at the NASTY red bastard up front... Democrat Congress, Republican President... the problem here is two fold... First Hoover signed the Leftist fiscal policy passed by the Democrat Congress... Second, the market was all but wiped out by that policy... and that which preceded it. Thus the gains represented by the blue box... It shows a 150 percent increase in the overall value of the market... up 150% from damn near nothin'... and it only took 12 years to do it... But it does make a lovely little box... even if it is deceptive as HELL to present it as such.
I think the stock market will make big gains over the next few years and Obama will get a lot of undeserved credit for that.
Corporations make money while unemployment remains high.
You Libs must be so proud.
because its dealing with Congress, the folks that actually enact legislationyup that is a much better graphic
more honest
What's more honest by taking a mere 20 years worth of data?
as long as no one is taxing the fuck out of themCorporations make money while unemployment remains high.
You Libs must be so proud.
This is how it works folks. And nobody deserves credit for any type of recovery. When we have a recession, companies trim the fat and become leaner so that they can remain profitable. Once they have cut the fat and become more profitable in a not so great economic environment, then there is extra money for growth. At that point they beging to expand again, and that is how we come out of a recession. This is basic stuff. It amazes me how so many don't get this.
ROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now understand kids... What she wants to point out here are a couple of misnomers...
First, she wants to point to the "President".... as if the president sets fiscal policy...
because its dealing with Congress, the folks that actually enact legislationyup that is a much better graphic
more honest
What's more honest by taking a mere 20 years worth of data?
I think they are saying that who has controlled Congress should be taken into account as well as which party controlled the white house.
Sure. Which is why I posted the table above.
But people are taking a highly improbable bet banging on the current President and are likely to be proven wrong 3.5 years from now.
I think the stock market will make big gains over the next few years and Obama will get a lot of undeserved credit for that.
you clearly have no clue how Rush does his showROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now understand kids... What she wants to point out here are a couple of misnomers...
First, she wants to point to the "President".... as if the president sets fiscal policy...
ROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now President ELECT is a completely different matter.
If it's a Dem then he is totally responsible for the stock market.
November 6, 2008
RUSH: The Obama recession is in full swing, ladies and gentlemen. Stocks are dying, which is a precursor of things to come. This is an Obama recession. Might turn into a depression. He hasn't done anything yet but his ideas are killing the economy. His ideas are killing Wall Street.
yes, they didbecause its dealing with Congress, the folks that actually enact legislationWhat's more honest by taking a mere 20 years worth of data?
And Congress didn't enact legislation the 100 years prior?
Look at all the years you can, not just the last 20.
and morons like you dont understand hyperboleSure. Which is why I posted the table above.
But people are taking a highly improbable bet banging on the current President and are likely to be proven wrong 3.5 years from now.
I think the stock market will make big gains over the next few years and Obama will get a lot of undeserved credit for that.
Undeserved blame is another matter entirely.
Like the people who were blaming the market losses on him BEFORE he was even sworn in are going to suddenly give him credit for the gains.
They're PROGRAMMED response to any economic progress is "we would have progressed FASTER."
I think they are saying that who has controlled Congress should be taken into account as well as which party controlled the white house.
Sure. Which is why I posted the table above.
But people are taking a highly improbable bet banging on the current President and are likely to be proven wrong 3.5 years from now.
The market will significantly outperform under Obama than it did under Bush.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/64052-stock-market-performance-by-president.html
ROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now understand kids... What she wants to point out here are a couple of misnomers...
First, she wants to point to the "President".... as if the president sets fiscal policy... The President SIGNS fiscal policy and executes the policy PASSED AND IMPLEMENTED BY THE LEGISLATURE...
Second she wants to look at gains...
We should HOPE the market does well... and as one who is ass deep in equities, I'm in that camp; but the Market is due for some gains given it's LOSSES since the LEFTISTS GAINED POWER.
And while it's a delightful little graph which hopes to show how the markets reacts to Republican -v- Democrat Presidents... It should be noted that the Market did its best (according to Toro's little graph, during the period when CONSERVATIVES were passing and implementing FISCAL POLICY! It's the lovely, but tallest 'white' box... labeled "Clinton."
Now lets look at the NASTY red bastard up front... Democrat Congress, Republican President... the problem here is two fold... First Hoover signed the Leftist fiscal policy passed by the Democrat Congress... Second, the market was all but wiped out by that policy... and that which preceded it. Thus the gains represented by the blue box... It shows a 150 percent increase in the overall value of the market... up 150% from damn near nothin'... and it only took 12 years to do it... But it does make a lovely little box... even if it is deceptive as HELL to present it as such.
I just went and read this post.
This is such bullshit garbage. Hoover's budgets never accounted for more than 1% of GDP until 1932, the bottom of the Great Depression. To say that the collapse of the economy was somehow a leftist creation of Congress is just revisionist and regurgitated lies that have been discussed and refuted endlessly, and which I will not do for the umpteenth time with PI.
you clearly have no clue how Rush does his showROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now understand kids... What she wants to point out here are a couple of misnomers...
First, she wants to point to the "President".... as if the president sets fiscal policy...
ROFLMNAO...
Oh GOD that's PRECIOUS!
Now President ELECT is a completely different matter.
If it's a Dem then he is totally responsible for the stock market.
November 6, 2008
RUSH: The Obama recession is in full swing, ladies and gentlemen. Stocks are dying, which is a precursor of things to come. This is an Obama recession. Might turn into a depression. He hasn't done anything yet but his ideas are killing the economy. His ideas are killing Wall Street.
you prove it over and over