P@triot
Diamond Member
This sums up the rational American people perfectly....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.I'm not really worried about any substantial threats to the empire.
Unlike liberals, I am not preventing you from discussing anything. I don't riot and resort to violence when a liberal tries to speak. And spare me they hyper-sensitive "don't label me" battle cry. Labels exist for a reason. They are a vital part of understanding. It's why we label things "mammals", and "reptiles", etc.I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.I'm not really worried about any substantial threats to the empire.
No discussion about anything in this society is there. Label, categorize, flame. Ideas and concepts are to tough.
Unlike liberals, I am not preventing you from discussing anything. I don't riot and resort to violence when a liberal tries to speak. And spare me they hyper-sensitive "don't label me" battle cry. Labels exist for a reason. They are a vital part of understanding. It's why we label things "mammals", and "reptiles", etc.I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.I'm not really worried about any substantial threats to the empire.
No discussion about anything in this society is there. Label, categorize, flame. Ideas and concepts are to tough.
Without labels, the world would be a lot more volatile. For instance, if someone is acting really stupid and you are informed that the person is mentally handicapped in some way, you realize it is not their fault. That's a vital label. If someone else is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are high on narcotics, you realize that although the direct action at the moment is not their fault, it is their fault for putting the narcotics in their system. You are going to treat that person different from the mentally handicapped person. Then, if yet another person is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are a liberal, you realize they are stupid by choice and you are going to treat them differently from the mentally handicapped and the drug addict.
Not true at all. I'll listen to ideas all day. What I won't listen to is the call to violate the law.Unlike liberals, I am not preventing you from discussing anything. I don't riot and resort to violence when a liberal tries to speak. And spare me they hyper-sensitive "don't label me" battle cry. Labels exist for a reason. They are a vital part of understanding. It's why we label things "mammals", and "reptiles", etc.I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.I'm not really worried about any substantial threats to the empire.
No discussion about anything in this society is there. Label, categorize, flame. Ideas and concepts are to tough.
Without labels, the world would be a lot more volatile. For instance, if someone is acting really stupid and you are informed that the person is mentally handicapped in some way, you realize it is not their fault. That's a vital label. If someone else is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are high on narcotics, you realize that although the direct action at the moment is not their fault, it is their fault for putting the narcotics in their system. You are going to treat that person different from the mentally handicapped person. Then, if yet another person is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are a liberal, you realize they are stupid by choice and you are going to treat them differently from the mentally handicapped and the drug addict.
Great rationalization. Anyone who has other ideas can be dismissed for your declaration of their stupidity, and you of course are always and forever correct. Thought so.
Not true at all. I'll listen to ideas all day. What I won't listen to is the call to violate the law.Unlike liberals, I am not preventing you from discussing anything. I don't riot and resort to violence when a liberal tries to speak. And spare me they hyper-sensitive "don't label me" battle cry. Labels exist for a reason. They are a vital part of understanding. It's why we label things "mammals", and "reptiles", etc.I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.I'm not really worried about any substantial threats to the empire.
No discussion about anything in this society is there. Label, categorize, flame. Ideas and concepts are to tough.
Without labels, the world would be a lot more volatile. For instance, if someone is acting really stupid and you are informed that the person is mentally handicapped in some way, you realize it is not their fault. That's a vital label. If someone else is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are high on narcotics, you realize that although the direct action at the moment is not their fault, it is their fault for putting the narcotics in their system. You are going to treat that person different from the mentally handicapped person. Then, if yet another person is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are a liberal, you realize they are stupid by choice and you are going to treat them differently from the mentally handicapped and the drug addict.
Great rationalization. Anyone who has other ideas can be dismissed for your declaration of their stupidity, and you of course are always and forever correct. Thought so.
If a person thinks guns should be outlawed - fine. Have that conversation, be honest about your intentions and reasons, and then try to convince the American people to legally amend the U.S. Constitution.
But liberals don't do that. They simply violate the law. And that is why I dismiss them. I would listen all day and discuss anything with anyone so long as they are willing to obey the law. I have no time or sympathy for criminals.
Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday.
Not true at all. I'll listen to ideas all day. What I won't listen to is the call to violate the law.Unlike liberals, I am not preventing you from discussing anything. I don't riot and resort to violence when a liberal tries to speak. And spare me they hyper-sensitive "don't label me" battle cry. Labels exist for a reason. They are a vital part of understanding. It's why we label things "mammals", and "reptiles", etc.I've got a $1,000 that says you're a liberal (uh?). They are always so naive about stuff like that.
No discussion about anything in this society is there. Label, categorize, flame. Ideas and concepts are to tough.
Without labels, the world would be a lot more volatile. For instance, if someone is acting really stupid and you are informed that the person is mentally handicapped in some way, you realize it is not their fault. That's a vital label. If someone else is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are high on narcotics, you realize that although the direct action at the moment is not their fault, it is their fault for putting the narcotics in their system. You are going to treat that person different from the mentally handicapped person. Then, if yet another person is acting really stupid, and you are informed they are a liberal, you realize they are stupid by choice and you are going to treat them differently from the mentally handicapped and the drug addict.
Great rationalization. Anyone who has other ideas can be dismissed for your declaration of their stupidity, and you of course are always and forever correct. Thought so.
If a person thinks guns should be outlawed - fine. Have that conversation, be honest about your intentions and reasons, and then try to convince the American people to legally amend the U.S. Constitution.
But liberals don't do that. They simply violate the law. And that is why I dismiss them. I would listen all day and discuss anything with anyone so long as they are willing to obey the law. I have no time or sympathy for criminals.
Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday.
Demonizing the opposition has been going on during our entire political history.
As opposed to Reagan blurting out his intention to bomb Moscow?And we all know that neither one of these idiots can keep national security secrets to themselves. Hillary has already proven as much. And we all know Donald's big mouth and ego will prevent him from keeping classified information to himself.
White House says Hillary can handle classified briefings. Trump? Eh.
My dear....it was your side that elected him as the nominee.Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday.
Demonizing the opposition has been going on during our entire political history.
not like this.
but i think drumpf should keep ranting and raving.
cause what worked for his ignoramuses isn't going to work on the rest of the voting public.
How is stating intent the same thing as releasing classified information?!?As opposed to Reagan blurting out his intention to bomb Moscow?And we all know that neither one of these idiots can keep national security secrets to themselves. Hillary has already proven as much. And we all know Donald's big mouth and ego will prevent him from keeping classified information to himself.
White House says Hillary can handle classified briefings. Trump? Eh.
Of course Reagan was joking, but it was an asinine thing for the POTUS to say.
How is stating intent the same thing as releasing classified information?!?As opposed to Reagan blurting out his intention to bomb Moscow?And we all know that neither one of these idiots can keep national security secrets to themselves. Hillary has already proven as much. And we all know Donald's big mouth and ego will prevent him from keeping classified information to himself.
White House says Hillary can handle classified briefings. Trump? Eh.
Of course Reagan was joking, but it was an asinine thing for the POTUS to say.
I know this is shocking to people like you, but....giving your opinion on something is still permitted under the 1st Amendment.
Why? He's such a coward, he's embolden our enemies. I would kill to hear him stand up like a real leader just once and threaten to bomb Moscow.How is stating intent the same thing as releasing classified information?!?As opposed to Reagan blurting out his intention to bomb Moscow?And we all know that neither one of these idiots can keep national security secrets to themselves. Hillary has already proven as much. And we all know Donald's big mouth and ego will prevent him from keeping classified information to himself.
White House says Hillary can handle classified briefings. Trump? Eh.
Of course Reagan was joking, but it was an asinine thing for the POTUS to say.
I know this is shocking to people like you, but....giving your opinion on something is still permitted under the 1st Amendment.
If Obama said such a statement you would throwing hissy fits.