Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,624
- 153
Would anyone really care if Mike Tyson knocked out Gary Coleman?
Paper view?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would anyone really care if Mike Tyson knocked out Gary Coleman?
1) There never were any weapons. We've gone over this.
2) Saddam was our man. So yeah, we got rid of our own guy when it suited us.
3)The country is far more unstable now than it was with Saddam.
4)Al-Qaeda was never shown to be there in the first place.
So, yeah. We "won" if you live in a logical fallacy.
I have realized that the liberals are going to do what ever it takes to taint the great victory in Iraq
Does anyone realize that war is over and it looks like we will be 100% gone in 6 months?
That there is a republic in place?
and that women vote and hold office?
I had no idea that the liberal media and there cock suckers would go to the level they have to make the troops look bad and make the success they fought hard for look like, well ask Drock and that crew
I dont even know how to explain it
DOES ANYBODY CARE WE WON?
Yes, I care that we've "won".
However, I care more that Jr. invaded the wrong country and fought an unjust war using 9/11 as a selling point. OBL was in Afghanistan/Pakistan, not Iraq.
Additionally, there were NO WMD's.
Saddam is who kept the Taliban OUT of Iraq, but when we invaded and took him out, the Taliban then moved in.
As far as the job the military did? They did the best they could with incompetent leadership under Jr. who sent them into battle without proper armor for the humvees.
Yeah, I care the war is over, but I care more that we shouldn't have gone in the first place.
I cared when we won it. Not so much since then. Just not an issue.
I guess I would have thought this Jan 1 would be the real end
any way thanks for the support
I cared when we won it. Not so much since then. Just not an issue.
I guess I would have thought this Jan 1 would be the real end
any way thanks for the support
There will no end in the near future regarding the cost of Iraq (and Afghanistan). Just the rehab/treatment of veterans is estimated to cost the US tax payer over a trillion dollars. I'm not just addressing the physical wounds, but also the mental wounds/PTSD.\
In other words, every budget for the next several years will included monies for the rehab and treatment of our wounded troops.
Then there is the cost of replacing/repairing equipment which took a beating in the sand laden environment.
Finally there's the toll on the families who lost love ones or are caring for their loved ones who have life long injuries from the war, both physically and mentally. It's easy to say, it was worth it, when one didn't sacrifice. But you will be paying for it, for years to come via your taxes.
In the end, going into an elective war with Iraq has already cost America much and will continue to do so, financially, emotionally and physically.
And what are we looking at financially? Certainly over two trillion dollars.
I have realized that the liberals are going to do what ever it takes to taint the great victory in Iraq
Does anyone realize that war is over and it looks like we will be 100% gone in 6 months?
That there is a republic in place?
and that women vote and hold office?
I had no idea that the liberal media and there cock suckers would go to the level they have to make the troops look bad and make the success they fought hard for look like, well ask Drock and that crew
I dont even know how to explain it
DOES ANYBODY CARE WE WON?
We did pretty much win it.
What did we really win?
The objectives were pretty much met, Saddam is no more and his government is toppled. We paid a heavier price than was expected in my opinion, but we pretty much did what we came to do, now whether you believe we should have went in or not is a different discussion.
What did we really win?
The objectives were pretty much met, Saddam is no more and his government is toppled. We paid a heavier price than was expected in my opinion, but we pretty much did what we came to do, now whether you believe we should have went in or not is a different discussion.
I thought we invaded to stop Sadam from launching nukes and such?
The objectives were pretty much met, Saddam is no more and his government is toppled. We paid a heavier price than was expected in my opinion, but we pretty much did what we came to do, now whether you believe we should have went in or not is a different discussion.
I thought we invaded to stop Sadam from launching nukes and such?
That was 1 of the reasons.
JRK it doesn't matter, the people that opposed the war won't change their stance.
Does anyone care we won the war in IRAQ?
I guess I would have thought this Jan 1 would be the real end
any way thanks for the support
There will no end in the near future regarding the cost of Iraq (and Afghanistan). Just the rehab/treatment of veterans is estimated to cost the US tax payer over a trillion dollars. I'm not just addressing the physical wounds, but also the mental wounds/PTSD.\
In other words, every budget for the next several years will included monies for the rehab and treatment of our wounded troops.
Then there is the cost of replacing/repairing equipment which took a beating in the sand laden environment.
Finally there's the toll on the families who lost love ones or are caring for their loved ones who have life long injuries from the war, both physically and mentally. It's easy to say, it was worth it, when one didn't sacrifice. But you will be paying for it, for years to come via your taxes.
In the end, going into an elective war with Iraq has already cost America much and will continue to do so, financially, emotionally and physically.
And what are we looking at financially? Certainly over two trillion dollars.
Do you have a link for that? because I have never heard that before.
JRK it doesn't matter, the people that opposed the war won't change their stance.
I supported going into Afghanistan for the obvious reason but taking a majority of resources and applying them to Iraq lengthened our efforts in Afghanistan. I would care to bet that if the US has stayed focused on Afghanistan, we'd be long gone from that shit hole.
Many lives wouldn't have been lost, many more lives wouldn't be ruined and the US would be far better off financially.
JRK it doesn't matter, the people that opposed the war won't change their stance.
I supported going into Afghanistan for the obvious reason but taking a majority of resources and applying them to Iraq lengthened our efforts in Afghanistan. I would care to bet that if the US has stayed focused on Afghanistan, we'd be long gone from that shit hole.
Many lives wouldn't have been lost, many more lives wouldn't be ruined and the US would be far better off financially.
The objections to the war in Iraq were never that we faced defeat. There was never any doubt that the U.S. military could defeat the Iraqi military. The objections, rather, were that:
1) It was a war of aggression, completely impossible to justify;
2) It would bog us down afterwards in a holding action against insurgents with ongoing casualties and costs halfway to forever;
3) It would drain resources from military efforts that actually had anything to do with finding and destroying the terrorist organization that attacked us; and
4) It would damage already-strained relations between us and our allies even further.
All of these objections have been proven valid. The fact that we "won" the war does not change any of them.
JRK it doesn't matter, the people that opposed the war won't change their stance.
I supported going into Afghanistan for the obvious reason but taking a majority of resources and applying them to Iraq lengthened our efforts in Afghanistan. I would care to bet that if the US has stayed focused on Afghanistan, we'd be long gone from that shit hole.
Many lives wouldn't have been lost, many more lives wouldn't be ruined and the US would be far better off financially.
I think if we had not went into Iraq and just focused on Afghanistan things would be a great deal better, but we wouldn't be gone completely. Afghanistan is a country that has had no standing government, Military or any kind of real infrastructure in decades, I think we would still be there but most of the fighting would have been done.
The objections to the war in Iraq were never that we faced defeat. There was never any doubt that the U.S. military could defeat the Iraqi military. The objections, rather, were that:
1) It was a war of aggression, completely impossible to justify;
2) It would bog us down afterwards in a holding action against insurgents with ongoing casualties and costs halfway to forever;
3) It would drain resources from military efforts that actually had anything to do with finding and destroying the terrorist organization that attacked us; and
4) It would damage already-strained relations between us and our allies even further.
All of these objections have been proven valid. The fact that we "won" the war does not change any of them.