Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Nothing melts ice like a tall glass full of Jim Beam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing melts ice like a tall glass full of Jim Beam.
Unless man finds a way to move Earth closer to the Sun, we will have an ice age again. It is a cycle of the planet, keep calm and tell the Faithers to shut up.
No, we won't. Not with the CO2 we're on track to emitting. We've cancelled the next ice age.
Of course, denier faithers won't care, since they have that mindless blind faith that humans can't affect climate. To deniers, the science is seen as an affront to their faith, hence why they're here screaming hatred at the science. It takes a religious-type belief to drive people to the levels of hysterical irrationality we see in deniers.
The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.
The have no lab work,
they are constantly altering the data
they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.
The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.
There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?
The have no lab work,
Climate scientists have lab work. What they have in far greater abundance is in situ evidence from the climate around us. But if you're really hung on lab work, where is yours?
they are constantly altering the data
The data are frequently improved - made more accurate. That this process makes things look worse than they did before is not evidence of falsehood. It's evidence that things are worse than previously thought.
they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.
Where do you find a denial that increasing temperatures will cause CO2 levels to increase, Frank? Show us one single link of any climate scientist making such a claim. And since no occurrence of what has been happening since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution appears anywhere in the Vostok cores, what do you believe to be the actual relevance of that data in that regard?
Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?
Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.
great, just show us that experiment dude/dudetter posting more stupid!!!Unless man finds a way to move Earth closer to the Sun, we will have an ice age again. It is a cycle of the planet, keep calm and tell the Faithers to shut up.
No, we won't. Not with the CO2 we're on track to emitting. We've cancelled the next ice age.
Of course, denier faithers won't care, since they have that mindless blind faith that humans can't affect climate. To deniers, the science is seen as an affront to their faith, hence why they're here screaming hatred at the science. It takes a religious-type belief to drive people to the levels of hysterical irrationality we see in deniers.
note 12 months of not posting the experiment to prove the 120 PPM oc CO2 claim. Note, there will be another 12 months, because it doesn't exist. Now, that is religion!!!Note that the deniars just flap yap, never post anything of substance? What a bunch of brain dead losers.
The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.
There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?
fine, then show the work on here.Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?
Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.
Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?
Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.
westwall, but that's a fact. Mantooth has no idea what a fact looks like.Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?
Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.
They don't? Which planet exactly do you live on? "Cause it sure isn't this one. The Vostock cores clearly show a 400-800 year lag between rising temps and the increase in atmospheric CO2.
The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.
There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?
The have no lab work,
Climate scientists have lab work. What they have in far greater abundance is in situ evidence from the climate around us. But if you're really hung on lab work, where is yours?
they are constantly altering the data
The data are frequently improved - made more accurate. That this process makes things look worse than they did before is not evidence of falsehood. It's evidence that things are worse than previously thought.
they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.
Where do you find a denial that increasing temperatures will cause CO2 levels to increase, Frank? Show us one single link of any climate scientist making such a claim. And since no occurrence of what has been happening since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution appears anywhere in the Vostok cores, what do you believe to be the actual relevance of that data in that regard?
We both know that paying people to shriek, "ManMade Global Warming, DENIER!!!" does not make them scientists.
You have no lab work, you've never presented any and certainly not any that links a wisp of CO2 to temperature. I don't have to present any lab work; it's your failed theory.
Contrary to your failed theory, the Vostock Ice core do not show CO2 leading temperature change, they show it lagging. If the system worked as you supposed, once we see spikes in CO2 we would see temperatures rising immediately after -- that's never to be found in a data set that spans 800,000 years.