Dissappearing Ice

[Billy_Bob]

Nothing melts ice like a tall glass full of Jim Beam.

 

[Old Rocks]

Note that the deniars just flap yap, never post anything of substance? What a bunch of brain dead losers.

 

[westwall]

Unless man finds a way to move Earth closer to the Sun, we will have an ice age again. It is a cycle of the planet, keep calm and tell the Faithers to shut up.

No, we won't. Not with the CO2 we're on track to emitting. We've cancelled the next ice age.

Of course, denier faithers won't care, since they have that mindless blind faith that humans can't affect climate. To deniers, the science is seen as an affront to their faith, hence why they're here screaming hatred at the science. It takes a religious-type belief to drive people to the levels of hysterical irrationality we see in deniers.

Sure we have. My gosh but you silly people have no clue.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Disappearing credibility. The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post. The have no lab work, they are constantly altering the data, they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.

 

[Crick]

The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.

There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?

The have no lab work,

Climate scientists have lab work. What they have in far greater abundance is in situ evidence from the climate around us. But if you're really hung on lab work, where is yours?

they are constantly altering the data

The data are frequently improved - made more accurate. That this process makes things look worse than they did before is not evidence of falsehood. It's evidence that things are worse than previously thought.

they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.

Where do you find a denial that increasing temperatures will cause CO2 levels to increase, Frank? Show us one single link of any climate scientist making such a claim. And since no occurrence of what has been happening since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution appears anywhere in the Vostok cores, what do you believe to be the actual relevance of that data in that regard?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.

There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?

The have no lab work,

Climate scientists have lab work. What they have in far greater abundance is in situ evidence from the climate around us. But if you're really hung on lab work, where is yours?

they are constantly altering the data

The data are frequently improved - made more accurate. That this process makes things look worse than they did before is not evidence of falsehood. It's evidence that things are worse than previously thought.

they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.

Where do you find a denial that increasing temperatures will cause CO2 levels to increase, Frank? Show us one single link of any climate scientist making such a claim. And since no occurrence of what has been happening since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution appears anywhere in the Vostok cores, what do you believe to be the actual relevance of that data in that regard?

We both know that paying people to shriek, "ManMade Global Warming, DENIER!!!" does not make them scientists.

You have no lab work, you've never presented any and certainly not any that links a wisp of CO2 to temperature. I don't have to present any lab work; it's your failed theory.

Contrary to your failed theory, the Vostock Ice core do not show CO2 leading temperature change, they show it lagging. If the system worked as you supposed, once we see spikes in CO2 we would see temperatures rising immediately after -- that's never to be found in a data set that spans 800,000 years.

 

[mamooth]

Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?

Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?

Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.

TM said it best, "LAIR!"

 

[jc456]

Unless man finds a way to move Earth closer to the Sun, we will have an ice age again. It is a cycle of the planet, keep calm and tell the Faithers to shut up.

No, we won't. Not with the CO2 we're on track to emitting. We've cancelled the next ice age.

Of course, denier faithers won't care, since they have that mindless blind faith that humans can't affect climate. To deniers, the science is seen as an affront to their faith, hence why they're here screaming hatred at the science. It takes a religious-type belief to drive people to the levels of hysterical irrationality we see in deniers.

great, just show us that experiment dude/dudetter posting more stupid!!!

 

[jc456]

Note that the deniars just flap yap, never post anything of substance? What a bunch of brain dead losers.

note 12 months of not posting the experiment to prove the 120 PPM oc CO2 claim. Note, there will be another 12 months, because it doesn't exist. Now, that is religion!!!

 

[jc456]

The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.

There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?

So, are you saying that none of the scienctists that first agreed with AGW have left the camp? You're really saying that piece of stupid? SEe, see, they just can't help posting more stupid. can't it's flippin hilarious.

 

[jc456]

Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?

Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.

fine, then show the work on here.

 

[westwall]

Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?

Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.

They don't? Which planet exactly do you live on? "Cause it sure isn't this one. The Vostock cores clearly show a 400-800 year lag between rising temps and the increase in atmospheric CO2.

 

[jc456]

Frank, as has been explained to you before, ice cores do _not_ show CO2 lagging temp. So why do you keep repeating that fable?

Given that you and the entire denier side keep getting caught fabricating everything at every opportunity, it's clear you're all cult frauds. That would be why nearly the whole planet considers you to be cult frauds. So why keep up the charade? You've been busted. It's not working. Your cult needs to go back to square one and invent some new fraud to grab the money and votes of cult rubes like you.

They don't? Which planet exactly do you live on? "Cause it sure isn't this one. The Vostock cores clearly show a 400-800 year lag between rising temps and the increase in atmospheric CO2.

westwall, but that's a fact. Mantooth has no idea what a fact looks like.

 

[Crick]

The AGWCult continues to lose more and more credibility every time they post.

There has certainly been no decrease in the number of scientists who accept AGW as valid. So, on what do you base this claim - besides your wishful thinking?

The have no lab work,

Climate scientists have lab work. What they have in far greater abundance is in situ evidence from the climate around us. But if you're really hung on lab work, where is yours?

they are constantly altering the data

The data are frequently improved - made more accurate. That this process makes things look worse than they did before is not evidence of falsehood. It's evidence that things are worse than previously thought.

they deny the Vostock Ice Cores show CO2 lagging temperature for 800,000 consecutive years.

Where do you find a denial that increasing temperatures will cause CO2 levels to increase, Frank? Show us one single link of any climate scientist making such a claim. And since no occurrence of what has been happening since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution appears anywhere in the Vostok cores, what do you believe to be the actual relevance of that data in that regard?

We both know that paying people to shriek, "ManMade Global Warming, DENIER!!!" does not make them scientists.

You have no lab work, you've never presented any and certainly not any that links a wisp of CO2 to temperature. I don't have to present any lab work; it's your failed theory.

Contrary to your failed theory, the Vostock Ice core do not show CO2 leading temperature change, they show it lagging. If the system worked as you supposed, once we see spikes in CO2 we would see temperatures rising immediately after -- that's never to be found in a data set that spans 800,000 years.

Show us a link to a climate scientist claiming that increasing temperatures do NOT cause increased CO2 levels.