CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,628
- 71,933
- 2,330
I don't recall the Federal Government, under the United States Constitution, to be allowed to have control and dictate over it's people (such as the mandate of Obamacare) but rather always be submissive to the will of the people that place them into such positions. When we begin to view the Federal Government as more of a position of supreme power and rule over its people, we begin to lose the intent of where that true power should "more respectfully" reside according to our Founding Fathers: A Constitution of limited Government power that answers to, and foremost preserves, the freedoms and rights of the "individual" liberties it's established (under the Declaration of Independence) to always protect.
The Constitution never called for limited Government. It establishes the confines and structure of Government and leaves it up to the elected officials to decide on the scope of Government
If you don't like the size of the Government, elect new officials. You will have no luck proving a large Government is Un-Constitutional
Honest question.
How are the EPA officials, unelected souls, able to rule and make laws when they are unelected bureaucrats ...?
How is this constitutional?
It's covered under the "Good and Commerce" Clause