JoeB131
Diamond Member
As you know, I am always 100% accurate and correct..
Always.
Sure you are... I know you need to believe that.
Kids, this is what happens when you lock up your mail order bride and let it listen to Hate Radio all day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As you know, I am always 100% accurate and correct..
Always.
As you know, I am always 100% accurate and correct..
Always.
Sure you are... I know you need to believe that.
Kids, this is what happens when you lock up your mail order bride and let it listen to Hate Radio all day.
Are you fawking kidding me? So, the purpose of our military was to protect us from people entering. You need to take an American History class. The founders were opposed to a standing army. The Constitution is structured in a way that the financing of the Army was temporary. And when the Constitution was adopted we had no need for protection from people entering because ANYBODY COULD COME IN. We had an open border. And when has the military ever been used to enforce a border? When have we ever had to repeal an invading force? And you do realize that the first use of the Army after the revolution was against our own citizens.
Well the purpose of a military certainly wasn't to kill coyotes. Are you suggesting we have been without a military at some point in our history, because that would be a lie as well. We have had immigration Laws since 1790.
Are you fawking kidding me? So, the purpose of our military was to protect us from people entering. You need to take an American History class. The founders were opposed to a standing army. The Constitution is structured in a way that the financing of the Army was temporary. And when the Constitution was adopted we had no need for protection from people entering because ANYBODY COULD COME IN. We had an open border. And when has the military ever been used to enforce a border? When have we ever had to repeal an invading force? And you do realize that the first use of the Army after the revolution was against our own citizens.
Well the purpose of a military certainly wasn't to kill coyotes. Are you suggesting we have been without a military at some point in our history, because that would be a lie as well. We have had immigration Laws since 1790.
You are confused. There was no "immigration" law in 1790. It was what it was called, a "naturalization" law. There were no rules on who could enter the country. We had open borders for almost one hundred years. Those rules were about who could become a citizen.
And the military was not tasked with killing coyotes. They were tasked with killing Native Americans which is about the polar opposite of enforcing the border.
Of course they are.
1. In the mid-60s the Democrat Party decided that the American public doesn't and won't endorse their insane policies.....and decided the answer was to replace the voting populace with a more malleable one.
Democrats knew what they were doing when they passed the 1965 immigration law that altered the flow from European immigrants to the flood from third world nations.
" Prior to 1965, the demographics of immigration stood as mostly Europeans; 68 percent of legal immigrants in the 1950s came from Europe and Canada.
The proponents of the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act argued that it would not significantly influence United States culture. [Democrat] President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions."[16] [Democrat] Secretary of StateDean Rusk and other politicians, including [Democrat] Senator Ted Kennedy, asserted that the bill would not affect US demographic mix.[17] However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law.[18][19] Specifically, the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Southern and Eastern Europe." Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia
2. There is an economic component here. Until America became a welfare state, there was no reason to stem the flow of immigrants.....any immigrants.
They came to work, for opportunity, not to be bought by the Democrats and told that they would be recompensed if they would just vote....illegally, and the 'right' way....as Obama told them to.
Milton Friedman was for illegal immigration.
"Friedman's considered view is that free migration without a welfare state is first best.
Welfare for all legal residents makes first-best free migration impossible. In that case, a high rate of illegal immigration is the second-best solution."
Milton Friedman's Argument for Illegal Immigration
Sooo....either open borders but no welfare in the country....or control of our borders but no welfare in the country.
Interesting economic choice?
3. It is difficult for Democrats to deny that they are for illegal immigration, open borders, when this headline appears today in their house organ, the NYTimes:
"There’s Nothing Wrong With Open Borders
.....a brave Democrat.....
I’m talking about opening up America’s borders to everyone who wants to move here.
...not just opposing President Trump’s wall but also opposing the nation’s cruel and expensive immigration and border-security apparatus in its entirety. Imagine radically shifting our stance toward outsiders from one of suspicion to one of warm embrace."
Opinion | There’s Nothing Wrong With Open Borders
.....as though those of us who work and earn and pay taxes would not have to shoulder the burden.
The party that shares the aims of Karl Marx are actually demanding that American workers bind themselves with the chains that Marx promised would be removed.
Clearly, Democrats are not the party for Americans.