Did Obama put civilians lives above the Benghazi deaths???

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
28,472
10,047
900
That maybe the reason NO military aid was forthcoming because of fear of repercussions if civilians were killed maybe?

We know for a FACT that this happened in Afghanistan..

"One soldier shows me the list of new regulations the platoon was given.
“Patrol only in areas that you are reasonably certain that you will not have to defend yourselves with lethal force,” the laminated card reads.

For a soldier who has traveled halfway around the world to fight, that’s like telling a cop he should only patrol in areas where he knows he won’t have to make arrests. “Does that make any f–king sense?” Pfc. Jared Pautsch. “We should just drop a f–king bomb on this place. You sit and ask yourself: What are we doing here?”

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/mcchrystals-real-offense-96873364.html#ixzz0raavCuPp

So just before the election, it would be disaster if "TERRORISM" which Obama declared done when he got Osama... RIGHT!!!

But it gets worse folks...

And the last Congressional Medal of Honor winner??? Dakota Meyer rightfully won the Medal of Honor .. no question..
.........but the traitor Obama that put around his neck ,CAUSED the deaths of the Marines!

How can Obama do that when HE KNOWS his orders got the Marines killed!
Here is why.. Obama's NEW rules of engagements did the following:

U.S. commanders, citing new rules to avoid civilian casualties,
rejected repeated calls to unleash artillery rounds at attackers dug into the slopes and tree lines — despite being told repeatedly that they weren't near the village."

'We're pinned down:' 4 U.S. Marines die in Afghan ambush | McClatchy
 

Forum List

Back
Top