TheAmerican
Senior Member
- May 4, 2014
- 148
- 33
- 46
Ok, we are getting there.
The issue that I have here, although there is a check in point, they could easily (I am assuming) hop on another flight to go to other cities.
In my humble opinion, not banning travel is costing the American people millions in dollars:
(a) Closing of places of businesses for suspected ebola cases - loss of revenue
(b) Paying for employees that have to be quarantined because of possible transmission - sending staff home for 21 days / loss of time for small business owners
(c) Closing schools / impairing children's school year
(d) Security / Quarantined Security / reallocating resources
I still say that this would be a better plan:
(a) Temporary suspend visas (Rubio and a lot of others thought of this, love it!)
(b) Port those connecting - 21 days in connecting countries / support medic team could be there (once cleared then they can come here
(c) Screen there - 21 days before allowing them to leave
DHS requires West Africa travelers to arrive at five airports
The issue that I have here, although there is a check in point, they could easily (I am assuming) hop on another flight to go to other cities.
In my humble opinion, not banning travel is costing the American people millions in dollars:
(a) Closing of places of businesses for suspected ebola cases - loss of revenue
(b) Paying for employees that have to be quarantined because of possible transmission - sending staff home for 21 days / loss of time for small business owners
(c) Closing schools / impairing children's school year
(d) Security / Quarantined Security / reallocating resources
I still say that this would be a better plan:
(a) Temporary suspend visas (Rubio and a lot of others thought of this, love it!)
(b) Port those connecting - 21 days in connecting countries / support medic team could be there (once cleared then they can come here
(c) Screen there - 21 days before allowing them to leave
DHS requires West Africa travelers to arrive at five airports